Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DeepSeek-V3.2's 58.6 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with an eight-GPU server who want an MIT agent model with broad runtime support, or agents calling it through a hosted provider
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
689.5 GB of FP8 files and no smaller build from DeepSeek or a runtime library, far beyond 107.4 GB
Best for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 60
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 34
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +34
DeepSeek-V3.2 34
The model card earns 14 when read with DeepSeek's own V3.2 model card PDF, which adds intended use and a parameter count, leaving languages and a knowledge cut-off missing. Training data earns 5, a general description with no cut-off. Last change earns 5, as nothing in the repository has changed since 1 December 2025 (338 days on 4 November) and DeepSeek's deepseek-recipe has no V3.2 code. Responsiveness earns nothing, with no reply from a deepseek-ai member in any of the 40 most recent discussions. Version policy earns 5 for earlier versions kept apart without dated notes. File health earns 5 because loading and parsing reports wait without a reply.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68
Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 0, none described. Last change 20, a commit on 3 November 2026. Responsiveness 20, OpenBMB answered 8 of 12 discussions. Version policy 10, earlier versions keep their repositories and the changes are dated and described. File health 10, the files agree. 8 + 0 + 20 + 20 + 10 + 10 = 68.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +30
DeepSeek-V3.2 60
Memory earns nothing, because the only build from DeepSeek or a runtime's library is the 689.5 GB FP8 release, which needs about 827 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes earn the full 25 for released model code in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers, and for Ollama 0.40.14, whose llama.cpp pin (b11963) carries the deepseek32 architecture with no gate in Ollama's server code, though its library entry stays retired; nothing from LM Studio. Builds earn 10 for the single FP8 precision DeepSeek publishes. Terms earn the full 15 for MIT with nothing added, and download the full 10 since the repository isn't gated. Hosted earns nothing, since DeepSeek's own API moved to V4 on 24 April 2026 and Hugging Face maps only DeepInfra as live for it on 4 November (Novita and Featherless in error), where the line needs two providers. Fireworks' model page says Serverless Not Supported and lists it only for on-demand deployment on dedicated GPUs, which is renting the hardware rather than calling a served model.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90
Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGUF, 4-bit safetensors builds and Ollama entry need 32 GB. Runtimes 25, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.18.0 and later, llama.cpp's own MiniCPM-V 4.7 support and OpenBMB's entry on Ollama. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes FP8, three 4-bit safetensors builds and GGUF. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider is mapped. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Agent interface MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +10
DeepSeek-V3.2 60
The chat template earns 10, as the format exists only as Python code to run. The tool-calling format earns 10 because DeepSeek documents the DSML format in code but names no runtime parser, which only vLLM's own recipe does. Trained tool calling earns the full 20 for several calls in one block. Structured output earns nothing, as JSON output isn't documented. Reasoning control earns 10 for thinking or chat mode per request with reasoning_content returned. Context earns 10 for 128K trained tokens.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows the tools array going in but not the call coming back, and names no parser. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request, off by default, with the trace between markers. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Risk MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5
DeepSeek-V3.2 50
File safety earns 15, safetensors only but 10 off because prompts are built by running DeepSeek's Python from the repository. Provenance earns the full 15 for the deepseek-ai organisation and a SHA-256 on every shard. Safety evaluation earns nothing, since no results are published anywhere. Agent guidance earns nothing, since the notes about the parser and the developer role are usage notes, read alike for all three DeepSeek listings. Licence risk keeps the full 15 for plain MIT. The security programme earns 5 for the security@deepseek.com reporting address on DeepSeek's site, with no public advisories.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed. Provenance 15, the files come from the openbmb organisation OpenBMB's GitHub README links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either, and the card has no limitations section. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no security.txt or SECURITY.md.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek-V3.2 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 90 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 70 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 34 | 68 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +34 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 58.6/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek-V3.2 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-12-01 | 2026-11-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
DeepSeek-V3.2
DeepSeek-V3.2 is an MIT-licensed reasoning model trained for parallel tool calls, with thinking chosen per request, for long agent work. It needs about 690 GB of FP8 files, eight 80 GB GPUs in vLLM's recipe and prompts built from DeepSeek's Python. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes since December 2025 and no safety evaluation.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
A vision-language cousin for images and video that fits a 24 to 32 GB machine from OpenBMB's own GGUF, under plain Apache 2.0, with a publisher that answers. The card says little about limits, training data or how tool calls come back, so test the tool format in your runtime before relying on it.
Before you call either
DeepSeek-V3.2
- Start it with vLLM's recipe, vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v32 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser deepseek_v32 --reasoning-parser deepseek_v3
- It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine at any qualifying build, so call DeepInfra (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2) or deploy it on Fireworks instead
- Outside vLLM, build prompts with encoding/encoding_dsv32.py and wrap parse_message_from_completion_text in error handling, since DeepSeek says it handles well-formed output only
- Pick thinking or chat with thinking_mode, and read the reasoning from reasoning_content
- Send developer messages only for search-agent prompts, the only use DeepSeek gives that role
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 and keep prompts within 128K tokens
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:35b-a3b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the 4x projector for more visual detail at a higher cost - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - With Transformers pass
enable_thinkingtoapply_chat_template, and passdownsample_modeto bothapply_chat_templateandgenerate - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser. The template uses the Qwen3.5 function-block format
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek-V3.2 or MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B?
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DeepSeek-V3.2's 58.6 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek-V3.2 or MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v3-2.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v3-2 minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v3-2", "b": "minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key