Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 57.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 60
- Risk, 55 against 30
- Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 42
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +30
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90
Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGUF, 4-bit safetensors builds and Ollama entry need 32 GB. Runtimes 25, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.18.0 and later, llama.cpp's own MiniCPM-V 4.7 support and OpenBMB's entry on Ollama. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes FP8, three 4-bit safetensors builds and GGUF. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider is mapped. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
MiniMax-M2.7 60
Memory earns 5. MiniMax only publishes its 230 GB FP8 release, and the smallest build of 4-bit or better from a runtime's own library is LM Studio's Q4_K_M GGUF at 138.3 GB, about 166 GB with the fifth added, so it needs more than our 107.4 GB machine and fits within 256 GB. Runtimes earn the full 25, with model code in released vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers, an LM Studio catalogue entry, and Ollama 0.40.14, whose pinned llama.cpp b11963 has the minimax-m2 architecture (capped at 25). Builds earn 10 for one publisher precision, the FP8 release. Terms earn 5, since the licence today allows only personal, research and non-profit use without MiniMax's written authorisation. Download earns 10, with no gate or account. Hosted earns 5, since Novita, Featherless AI and DeepInfra serve it through Hugging Face, while MiniMax's own API is closed to new users and retires it on 18 November 2026.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +26
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68
Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 0, none described. Last change 20, a commit on 3 November 2026. Responsiveness 20, OpenBMB answered 8 of 12 discussions. Version policy 10, earlier versions keep their repositories and the changes are dated and described. File health 10, the files agree. 8 + 0 + 20 + 20 + 10 + 10 = 68.
MiniMax-M2.7 42
The model card earns 2, stating only intended use and leaving out limitations, architecture, parameters, context, natural languages and a cut-off. Training data earns nothing, since only the training process is described. The last change earns 20, a card commit on 26 October 2026 that renames a MiniMax Agent link to MiniMax Code, 9 days before this check; the files, template and code last changed on 20 April 2026. Responsiveness earns 10, with a MiniMax reply in 8 of 36 discussions, none since June. Version policy earns 5, since earlier and later models sit in their own repositories without dated notes. File health earns 5, because a report that it doesn't load in Transformers v5 waits without a reply.
Risk MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +25
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed. Provenance 15, the files come from the openbmb organisation OpenBMB's GitHub README links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either, and the card has no limitations section. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no security.txt or SECURITY.md.
MiniMax-M2.7 30
File safety earns 15, safetensors only with no pickle files, less 10 because every documented loading route passes trust_remote_code for the repository's Python. Provenance earns the full 15, files in the organisation MiniMax links to with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing, as MiniMax publishes neither. Licence risk earns nothing (read 21 October 2026). The Prohibited Uses appendix goes beyond the law, MiniMax swapped a commercial licence for a non-commercial one two days after release, and neither that swap nor the amendment three days later carries a dated note. The security programme earns nothing, with no security.txt, disclosure policy, SECURITY.md or advisories.
Agent interface MiniMax-M2.7 +5
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows the tools array going in but not the call coming back, and names no parser. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request, off by default, with the trace between markers. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
MiniMax-M2.7 75
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, as MiniMax's own guide documents how tools go in and how calls come back, gives a parsing function, and its deployment guides name the vLLM and SGLang parsers. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several invoke blocks in one call. Structured output earns nothing, since JSON output isn't documented or claimed. Reasoning control earns nothing, because thinking is always on with no documented way to turn it off or budget it. Context earns 10 for 204,800 tokens in the config with no position scaling.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | MiniMax-M2.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 60 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 30 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 75 | MiniMax-M2.7 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 68 | 42 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +26 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 57.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-04-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
A vision-language cousin for images and video that fits a 24 to 32 GB machine from OpenBMB's own GGUF, under plain Apache 2.0, with a publisher that answers. The card says little about limits, training data or how tool calls come back, so test the tool format in your runtime before relying on it.
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:35b-a3b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the 4x projector for more visual detail at a higher cost - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - With Transformers pass
enable_thinkingtoapply_chat_template, and passdownsample_modeto bothapply_chat_templateandgenerate - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser. The template uses the Qwen3.5 function-block format
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 57.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cola2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-minimax-m2-7.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b minimax-m2-7(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b", "b": "minimax-m2-7"}at/mcp, no key