Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
Kolibri-1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for German and English agent work with tools on a machine with about 96 GB of accelerator memory and vLLM, where a permissive licence matters.
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 30
- Agent interface, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 27
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
The smallest publisher build is FP8 at 78.8 GB, so it needs about 95 GB and won't fit a 64 GB machine
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax-M2.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 30 | Kolibri-1 +35 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 75 | Kolibri-1 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 70 | 27 | Kolibri-1 +43 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 56.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Aleph Alpha | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-19 | 2026-04-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kolibri-1
Kolibri-1 is a German and English reasoning model with a documented tool-call format, switchable thinking and a 262,144-token context, under Apache 2.0. Aleph Alpha's FP8 build needs about 95 GB and runs on vLLM through its plugin, Transformers 5.20 or recent llama.cpp. The main risk is no published safety results or security contact, and few repository answers.
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
Before you call either
Kolibri-1
- Start it with pip install 'aleph-alpha-inference>=1' then vllm serve Aleph-Alpha/Kolibri-1 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --reasoning-parser kolibri1 --tool-call-parser kolibri1 --enable-auto-tool-choice
- Without the kolibri1 tool-call parser and enable-auto-tool-choice, tool calls come back as text in tool_call tags
- The plugin supports one vLLM minor version, 0.29, so don't upgrade vLLM while it's installed
- Thinking is on by default at high effort. Pass reasoning_effort none or enable_thinking false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
- Recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.97 and top_k 128
- Past 262,144 tokens, add --max-model-len 1048576 and the max_position_embeddings override in --hf-overrides, though Aleph Alpha recommends staying at or below 262,144
- With Transformers 5.20 or later, tokenizer.parse_response returns the answer in content and the reasoning in thinking
- On the reference machine the FP8 build fits by size, but no document confirms vLLM runs FP8 on gfx1151, and Aleph Alpha ships no GGUF for llama.cpp
- Validate tool results in your own code, as the card asks
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kolibri-1 or MiniMax-M2.7?
Kolibri-1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Kolibri-1 or MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kolibri-1
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kolibri-1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kolibri-1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs Kolibri-1
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kolibri-1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kolibri-1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs Kolibri-1
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kolibri-1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kolibri-1 vs occamy-1.0
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kolibri-1-vs-minimax-m2-7.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kolibri-1.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kolibri-1 minimax-m2-7(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kolibri-1", "b": "minimax-m2-7"}at/mcp, no key