Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Best for Hobbyist and research agents that want a faster-finishing Qwen3.8-27B for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 60
- Risk, 50 against 30
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 27
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.5 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
Published from a personal account, with no organisation, security contact or safety evaluation
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 85 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 30 | 50 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 60 | MiniMax-M2.7 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 27 | 56 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.1/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | Jackrong |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) | Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin tuned to think less per turn in long agent loops, with an MTP head for speculative decoding in llama.cpp. It fits 24 GB with Jackrong's 4-bit GGUF. The risks are one person's experimental release with no safety work, training traces taken from Claude and GPT, and a tool format that differs from Qwen's.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf Jackrong/Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17 GB, and add mmproj-F32.gguf for images - The card's tests used Q5_K_M with the bundled MTP head and
--spec-type draft-mtpin llama.cpp - The template asks for tool calls as JSON inside tool_call tags, so use a Hermes-style parser (vLLM's hermes), not Qwen3.8's qwen3_coder
- For coding the card recommends enable_thinking true, reasoning_effort xhigh and temperature 0.3, which you must pass yourself, since generation_config.json says 1.0
- reasoning_effort takes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error
- Earlier reasoning stays in the context unless preserve_thinking is false
- Cap max_tokens, since a report says it loops more than V1
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M2.7 or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2?
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M2.7 or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json·/api/v1/tools/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m2-7 qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m2-7", "b": "qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2"}at/mcp, no key