Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
Qwen3-Coder-Next scores 57.6 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on capability. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
Ahead on
- Capability, 71 against 42
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Best for Agents that want a local coding model for long tool-calling loops on a single 64 GB to 128 GB machine.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 60
- Risk, 50 against 30
- Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 27
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
No LICENSE file anywhere and a broken licence link on the card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3-Coder-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 71 | 42 | MiniMax-M2.7 +29 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 85 | Qwen3-Coder-Next +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 30 | 50 | Qwen3-Coder-Next +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 75 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 27 | 41 | Qwen3-Coder-Next +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.1/100 | C 57.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3-Coder-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-20 | 2026-02-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
Qwen3-Coder-Next
A fast coding cousin for agent harnesses, with 3B active parameters and tool calling trained across many scaffold formats for Claude Code, Cline or Qwen Code loops. Alibaba's 4-bit GGUF needs about 58 GB, fitting one 64 GB machine, and two providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no change since February, no replies and no safety results.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3-coder-next(Q4_K_M, 52 GB of files) - On our reference machine Alibaba's Q8_0 GGUF (84.8 GB, about 102 GB in use) also fits, run with
llama-server -m Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0/Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0-00001-of-00004.gguf --jinja -ngl 99 -fa on -c 131072 - Serve with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(vLLM 0.15.0 or later), using the built-in parser rather than the repository's qwen3coder_tool_parser_vllm.py, which fails to import on newer vLLM per discussion 36 - The card's commands use tensor parallel 2 though the text says 4 GPUs, and it suggests cutting the context to 32,768 if the server fails to start
- There's no thinking mode, so don't pass
enable_thinkingor wait for reasoning_content - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40
- The GGUF card's llama.cpp example path omits the quant from the file name; the real files are named like Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00004.gguf
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M2.7 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Qwen3-Coder-Next scores 57.6 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M2.7's 56.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M2.7 leads on capability.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M2.7 or Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-qwen3-coder-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-coder-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m2-7 qwen3-coder-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m2-7", "b": "qwen3-coder-next"}at/mcp, no key