Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-Coder-Next's 57.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-Coder-Next leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents and developers who want a small, permissively licensed tool-calling model on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, in almost any runtime
Ahead on
- Capability, 59 against 42
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No change to the files since 29 January 2026 and no zai-org reply on discussions since 31 January
Best for Agents that want a local coding model for long tool-calling loops on a single 64 GB to 128 GB machine.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 80
- Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 28
Watch for
No LICENSE file anywhere and a broken licence link on the card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3-Coder-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 59 | 42 | GLM-4.7-Flash +17 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 85 | Qwen3-Coder-Next +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | GLM-4.7-Flash +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | GLM-4.7-Flash +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 28 | 41 | Qwen3-Coder-Next +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | C 57.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3-Coder-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-01-29 | 2026-02-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
GLM-4.7-Flash
A small MIT-licensed mixture-of-experts model with about 3B active parameters, for local agent and coding work with several tool calls per turn and optional thinking. It runs in Ollama at about 23 GB and in nearly every common runtime. The main risk is neglect, with no changes or replies since early February and no safety results.
Qwen3-Coder-Next
A fast coding cousin for agent harnesses, with 3B active parameters and tool calling trained across many scaffold formats for Claude Code, Cline or Qwen Code loops. Alibaba's 4-bit GGUF needs about 58 GB, fitting one 64 GB machine, and two providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no change since February, no replies and no safety results.
Before you call either
GLM-4.7-Flash
- On our reference machine start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash --max-model-len 65536 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm45 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-4.7-flash - Or run
ollama run glm-4.7-flashfor the 19 GB q4_K_M build - Without the glm47 and glm45 parsers, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Use a released vLLM (0.32.0 or later) or SGLang (0.5.22 or later); the card's nightly and pull-request builds date from January 2026
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false}for short tasks, since thinking is on by default - Set
clear_thinking: falseto keep earlier reasoning in multi-turn agent work, as Z.ai does for τ²-Bench and Terminal Bench - Set the context length yourself, since config.json allows 202,752 tokens and tokenizer_config.json says 128,000
Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3-coder-next(Q4_K_M, 52 GB of files) - On our reference machine Alibaba's Q8_0 GGUF (84.8 GB, about 102 GB in use) also fits, run with
llama-server -m Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0/Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0-00001-of-00004.gguf --jinja -ngl 99 -fa on -c 131072 - Serve with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(vLLM 0.15.0 or later), using the built-in parser rather than the repository's qwen3coder_tool_parser_vllm.py, which fails to import on newer vLLM per discussion 36 - The card's commands use tensor parallel 2 though the text says 4 GPUs, and it suggests cutting the context to 32,768 if the server fails to start
- There's no thinking mode, so don't pass
enable_thinkingor wait for reasoning_content - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40
- The GGUF card's llama.cpp example path omits the quant from the file name; the real files are named like Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00004.gguf
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-Coder-Next's 57.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-Coder-Next leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-qwen3-coder-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-4-7-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-coder-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-4-7-flash qwen3-coder-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-4-7-flash", "b": "qwen3-coder-next"}at/mcp, no key