Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next

gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen3-Coder-Next's 57.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-Coder-Next leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

gpt-oss-120bOpenAI · Open-weight model BB70.2/100#6 of 100 open-weight models Qwen3-Coder-NextAlibaba (Qwen team) · Open-weight model C57.6/100#70 of 100 open-weight models

Which one, for what

gpt-oss-120b BB

Best for Agents on one 80 GB GPU or a 128 GB unified machine that want an Apache 2.0 reasoning model with wide runtime support

Ahead on

Capability, 54 against 42
Risk, 95 against 50
Agent interface, 90 against 75

Also in its favour

Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5

Watch for

Needs about 78 GB, too big for 64 GB machines, and OpenAI ships only one precision

Qwen3-Coder-Next C

Best for Agents that want a local coding model for long tool-calling loops on a single 64 GB to 128 GB machine.

Ahead on

Reach, 85 against 75

Watch for

No LICENSE file anywhere and a broken licence link on the card

Score by category

Category	Weight this run	gpt-oss-120b	Qwen3-Coder-Next	Edge
Capability	35%35	54	42	gpt-oss-120b +12
Reach	25%25	75	85	Qwen3-Coder-Next +10
Risk	20%20	95	50	gpt-oss-120b +45
Agent interface	10%10	90	75	gpt-oss-120b +15
Documentation and upkeep	10%10	45	41	gpt-oss-120b +4
Negative events	≤15	0	0
Total		BB 70.2/100	C 57.6/100

Facts side by side

Fact	gpt-oss-120b	Qwen3-Coder-Next
Kind	Open-weight model	Open-weight model
Vendor	OpenAI	Alibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpoint	no (local only)	no (local only)
Transports
Auth	None	None
Pricing	Free	Free
x402	no	no
Licence	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documented	no	no
llms.txt	no	no
Last release	2025-08-26	2026-02-03
Terms last updated	no document linked	no document linked
Privacy policy last updated	no document linked	no document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews	3.5/5 (4)	2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

gpt-oss-120b

A reasoning and agent cousin that runs in most runtimes under Apache 2.0 with published safety work. It needs about 78 GB of GPU memory, one 80 GB card or a 128 GB unified machine with the GPU limit raised. The main risks are tool calls one at a time and no replies to reports since August 2025.

Qwen3-Coder-Next

A fast coding cousin for agent harnesses, with 3B active parameters and tool calling trained across many scaffold formats for Claude Code, Cline or Qwen Code loops. Alibaba's 4-bit GGUF needs about 58 GB, fitting one 64 GB machine, and two providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no change since February, no replies and no safety results.

Before you call either

gpt-oss-120b

Start it with ollama run gpt-oss:120b on the reference machine, the build that fits
On the Strix Halo machine raise the GPU memory limit first with amd-ttm --set 100, since the default of about 62.8 GiB is below the 78 GB it needs
With vLLM use vllm serve openai/gpt-oss-120b --tool-call-parser openai --enable-auto-tool-choice per vLLM's recipe, or parse raw output with openai-harmony
Always use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony, the card says it won't work correctly otherwise
Set Reasoning: low in the system message for short tasks, medium is the default
Pass the reasoning back after a tool call until the final answer, and keep the analysis channel away from end users
Expect one tool call per turn and loop, don't wait for parallel calls

Qwen3-Coder-Next

Quickest start is ollama run qwen3-coder-next (Q4_K_M, 52 GB of files)
On our reference machine Alibaba's Q8_0 GGUF (84.8 GB, about 102 GB in use) also fits, run with llama-server -m Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0/Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0-00001-of-00004.gguf --jinja -ngl 99 -fa on -c 131072
Serve with vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder (vLLM 0.15.0 or later), using the built-in parser rather than the repository's qwen3coder_tool_parser_vllm.py, which fails to import on newer vLLM per discussion 36
The card's commands use tensor parallel 2 though the text says 4 GPUs, and it suggests cutting the context to 32,768 if the server fails to start
There's no thinking mode, so don't pass enable_thinking or wait for reasoning_content
Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40
The GGUF card's llama.cpp example path omits the quant from the file name; the real files are named like Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00004.gguf
Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-120b or Qwen3-Coder-Next?

gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen3-Coder-Next's 57.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-Coder-Next leads on reach.

Other comparisons with gpt-oss-120b or Qwen3-Coder-Next

Machine-readable

This page as Markdown /compare/gpt-oss-120b-vs-qwen3-coder-next.md · slim .min.md · JSON .json (or send Accept: text/markdown)
Each listing in full /api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-120b.json · /api/v1/tools/qwen3-coder-next.json
From a terminal anchor compare gpt-oss-120b qwen3-coder-next (the CLI)
Over MCP compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-120b", "b": "qwen3-coder-next"} at /mcp, no key

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an audit See a sample report