Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-Coder-Next's 57.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-Coder-Next leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Capability, 70 against 42
- Reach, 90 against 85
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Best for Agents that want a local coding model for long tool-calling loops on a single 64 GB to 128 GB machine.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 36
Watch for
No LICENSE file anywhere and a broken licence link on the card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Qwen3.8-27B | Qwen3-Coder-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 70 | 42 | Qwen3.8-27B +28 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | Qwen3.8-27B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Qwen3.8-27B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 75 | Qwen3-Coder-Next +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 41 | Qwen3-Coder-Next +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 68.6/100 | C 57.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Qwen3.8-27B | Qwen3-Coder-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Alibaba (Qwen team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-14 | 2026-02-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Qwen3.8-27B
A dense cousin for coding and agent work with image and video input that runs almost anywhere. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and five providers host it for agents without the hardware. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba answers, there are no safety results or agent guidance, and the tool format is only in the template.
Qwen3-Coder-Next
A fast coding cousin for agent harnesses, with 3B active parameters and tool calling trained across many scaffold formats for Claude Code, Cline or Qwen Code loops. Alibaba's 4-bit GGUF needs about 58 GB, fitting one 64 GB machine, and two providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no change since February, no replies and no safety results.
Before you call either
Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3.8, about 18 GB of files - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, since FP8 on gfx1151 isn't documented - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, SGLang's cookbook says the Hermes parser leaves its calls unparsed
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Preserved thinking keeps earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens, the card warns static YaRN can cost quality on short texts
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3-coder-next(Q4_K_M, 52 GB of files) - On our reference machine Alibaba's Q8_0 GGUF (84.8 GB, about 102 GB in use) also fits, run with
llama-server -m Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0/Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8_0-00001-of-00004.gguf --jinja -ngl 99 -fa on -c 131072 - Serve with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(vLLM 0.15.0 or later), using the built-in parser rather than the repository's qwen3coder_tool_parser_vllm.py, which fails to import on newer vLLM per discussion 36 - The card's commands use tensor parallel 2 though the text says 4 GPUs, and it suggests cutting the context to 32,768 if the server fails to start
- There's no thinking mode, so don't pass
enable_thinkingor wait for reasoning_content - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40
- The GGUF card's llama.cpp example path omits the quant from the file name; the real files are named like Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00004.gguf
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Qwen3.8-27B or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-Coder-Next's 57.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-Coder-Next leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Qwen3.8-27B or Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/qwen3-8-27b-vs-qwen3-coder-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-27b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-coder-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare qwen3-8-27b qwen3-coder-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "qwen3-8-27b", "b": "qwen3-coder-next"}at/mcp, no key