Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Kimi K3's 62.4 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Kimi K3 leads on capability, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Kimi K3 B
Best for Teams with a multi-node GPU cluster who want an open 1M-context agent model for long coding and research work
Ahead on
- Capability, 75 against 70
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 36
Watch for
1,561 GB of files at its smallest publisher build, far beyond any single machine
Best for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 50
- Agent interface, 70 against 65
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kimi K3 | Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 75 | 70 | Kimi K3 +5 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 90 | Qwen3.8-27B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 55 | Kimi K3 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 70 | Qwen3.8-27B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 36 | Kimi K3 +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.4/100 | B 68.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kimi K3 | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Kimi K3 License (modified MIT) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-02 | 2026-08-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is a 2.8T multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, parallel tool calls and per-request effort, for long coding and research sessions. Its 1,561 GB of files need a multi-node GPU cluster, so most agents will call a hosted copy. The main risks are Moonshot's Python running at load and prompt time, and no answers in its repository.
Qwen3.8-27B
A dense cousin for coding and agent work with image and video input that runs almost anywhere. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and five providers host it for agents without the hardware. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba answers, there are no safety results or agent guidance, and the tool format is only in the template.
Before you call either
Kimi K3
- Start it with SGLang on a node of 8 B300s, sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path moonshotai/Kimi-K3 --tp-size 8 --context-length 65536 --mem-fraction-static 0.82 --reasoning-parser kimi_k3 --tool-call-parser kimi_k3 --port 30000
- Use the kimi_k3 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, and validate tool-call arguments against the schema, since vLLM's recipe says K3 sometimes emits a format its parser doesn't expect
- Pass the whole assistant message back every turn, reasoning_content and tool_calls included, or output becomes unstable
- Thinking is always on; set reasoning_effort to low or high when max is too slow
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, with top-p 0.95 for single-step tasks and 1.0 for agentic ones
- Don't hand an ongoing session from another model to K3, and state boundaries in the system prompt, since Moonshot warns it can act on its own when intent is unclear
- Without the hardware, call it through Moonshot's API or an inference provider listed on its Hugging Face page
Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3.8, about 18 GB of files - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, since FP8 on gfx1151 isn't documented - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, SGLang's cookbook says the Hermes parser leaves its calls unparsed
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Preserved thinking keeps earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens, the card warns static YaRN can cost quality on short texts
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Kimi K3's 62.4 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Kimi K3 leads on capability, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Kimi K3
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kimi K3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kimi K3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Kimi K3
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kimi-k3-vs-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kimi-k3.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kimi-k3 qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kimi-k3", "b": "qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key