Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3
Kimi K3 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Granite 4.2 30B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Granite 4.2 30B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 41
Watch for
No safety results published for it
Kimi K3 B
Best for Teams with a multi-node GPU cluster who want an open 1M-context agent model for long coding and research work
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
Watch for
1,561 GB of files at its smallest publisher build, far beyond any single machine
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Granite 4.2 30B +46
Granite 4.2 30B 87
Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 12 tested languages are on the card. Training data 20, IBM's disclosure file for the 30B lists the datasets used in pre-training and post-training as machine-readable metadata, and the card describes the three training stages. Last change 15, the last commit to the repository was on 4 September 2026, 67 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 4 discussions that aren't pull requests (28 August to 3 November 2026), 3 have a reply from an ibm-granite member. Version policy 5, Granite 4.1 30B stays in its own repository and 4.2 came out in new ones. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture, the 131,072-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 20 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 87.
Kimi K3 41
The model card earns 11, covering intended use, architecture, parameters and context, but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description with no cut-off. The last change earns 15, an encoding_k3.py update on 20 August, 74 days before 2 November and within 90; the GitHub repository's last commit is 6 August. Responsiveness earns nothing, with no Moonshot reply in the 40 most recent discussions. Version policy earns 5 for a first release. File health earns 5, because a report that the tokeniser goes past the declared vocabulary waits without a reply.
Reach Granite 4.2 30B +40
Granite 4.2 30B 90
Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB. Its Q4_0 GGUF is 16.58 GB and Ollama's library build granite4.2:30b 18 GB, the same band. Runtimes 25, Released versions run the granite architecture in llama.cpp (granite, b12242), vLLM (GraniteForCausalLM in the v0.33.0 registry), SGLang (granite.py at v0.5.23), Transformers (v5.22.2) and Ollama (its own granite4.2 library entry, 30b tag). Builds 15, IBM publishes FP8, MXFP4 and NVFP4 safetensors builds, a GGUF repository with Q4_0 to Q8_0 and BF16 files, and 4-bit, 8-bit and BF16 MLX builds, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI-approved licence, with no use policy or other terms added on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the BF16, FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX repositories, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps one inference provider (DeepInfra, live), short of the two the line needs. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Kimi K3 50
Memory earns nothing, because the only build of 4-bit precision or better from Moonshot or a runtime's own library is Moonshot's MXFP4 release of 1,561 GB, about 1,873 GB with the fifth added, far above 256 GB. Ollama and LM Studio list it only as a cloud model. Runtimes earn 15, for model code in released vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp; Transformers has no kimi_k3 code of its own and loads Moonshot's remote code, so it doesn't count. Builds earn 10 for one publisher precision, the MXFP4 files the model was trained for. Terms earn 10, a custom MIT-based licence that is free for commercial use below a revenue threshold. Download earns 10, with no gate and no account. Hosted earns 5, since Moonshot's API serves it and five inference providers are live for it on Hugging Face.
Agent interface Granite 4.2 30B +20
Granite 4.2 30B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort. Tool-calling format 25, the card has tool-calling sections for vLLM and SGLang, declares tools with OpenAI's function schema and names the parser to use, qwen3_coder, which both runtimes ship in the released versions read. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one turn, and the card names tool calling and agentic workflows as what it's best for. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output or how to ask for it. Reasoning control 10, the card documents thinking on by default, non-thinking and low-effort modes per request through the template (enable_thinking and low_effort), with the reasoning returned apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 tokens natively per the card and config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Kimi K3 65
The chat template earns 10, because there is no Jinja template and the prompt format exists only as encoding_k3.py, code you run. The tool-calling format earns 10, since Moonshot documents the tools channel but the parser name comes only from vLLM's and SGLang's own recipes. Trained tool calling earns 20 for indexed parallel calls in one turn. Structured output earns 5, as the card names it among its linked guides without saying how to ask the weights for it, and the how sits in hosted-API docs. Reasoning control earns 10, with per-request effort documented on the card and reasoning returned as reasoning_content. Context earns 10 for 1,048,576 tokens trained in.
Risk Kimi K3 +10
Granite 4.2 30B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the ibm-granite organisation, which IBM's Granite docs and the GitHub README link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, and the card's licence link resolves. Security programme 5, www.ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt names IBM PSIRT, read for the 3B listing on 4 November 2026 (5). 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
Kimi K3 65
File safety earns 15, safetensors only with no pickle files, less 10 because the documented loading path runs Moonshot's Python with trust_remote_code and builds prompts with encoding_k3.py. Provenance earns the full 15, files in the organisation Moonshot links to with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation earns 20 for the cyber assessment the UK AI Security Institute and CAISI ran and published, which found its safeguards didn't stop exploit development. Agent guidance earns 5 for the blog's general cautions about proactiveness and passing back thinking. Licence risk earns 10, losing 5 for the model-as-a-service revenue threshold and nothing else. The security programme earns nothing, with no security.txt, disclosure policy, SECURITY.md or public advisories found.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Granite 4.2 30B | Kimi K3 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 50 | Granite 4.2 30B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | Kimi K3 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 65 | Granite 4.2 30B +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 87 | 41 | Granite 4.2 30B +46 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 62.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Granite 4.2 30B | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | IBM | Moonshot AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Kimi K3 License (modified MIT) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Granite 4.2 30B
IBM's largest reasoning cousin, with the same strengths as the 3B. It runs in every runtime we count from IBM's own builds on a 24 GB card, is signed, plain Apache 2.0, and comes with a disclosure of its training data. No safety results are published and structured output isn't documented.
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is a 2.8T multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, parallel tool calls and per-request effort, for long coding and research sessions. Its 1,561 GB of files need a multi-node GPU cluster, so most agents will call a hosted copy. The main risks are Moonshot's Python running at load and prompt time, and no answers in its repository.
Before you call either
Granite 4.2 30B
- Start it with
ollama run granite4.2:30b, orllama-server -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja - With vLLM 0.32.0 or later leave out
--reasoning-parser-plugin, since the parser is built in, and use--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinkingfalse to turn it off orlow_efforttrue for short reasoning - The context is 131,072 tokens. The card's 512K extension isn't documented
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- IBM recommends Granite Guardian beside it to flag risky inputs and outputs
Kimi K3
- Start it with SGLang on a node of 8 B300s, sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path moonshotai/Kimi-K3 --tp-size 8 --context-length 65536 --mem-fraction-static 0.82 --reasoning-parser kimi_k3 --tool-call-parser kimi_k3 --port 30000
- Use the kimi_k3 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, and validate tool-call arguments against the schema, since vLLM's recipe says K3 sometimes emits a format its parser doesn't expect
- Pass the whole assistant message back every turn, reasoning_content and tool_calls included, or output becomes unstable
- Thinking is always on; set reasoning_effort to low or high when max is too slow
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, with top-p 0.95 for single-step tasks and 1.0 for agentic ones
- Don't hand an ongoing session from another model to K3, and state boundaries in the system prompt, since Moonshot warns it can act on its own when intent is unclear
- Without the hardware, call it through Moonshot's API or an inference provider listed on its Hugging Face page
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Granite 4.2 30B or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Granite 4.2 30B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Granite 4.2 30B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Granite 4.2 30B or Kimi K3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3
- Arete-27B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Arete-27B vs Kimi K3
- BigBang-v1 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Kimi K3
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Carbon-X vs Kimi K3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kimi K3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 30B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K3
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling vs Kimi K3
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3
- Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3 vs Kronos
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Mistral Large 4
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-kimi-k3.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/granite-4-2-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/kimi-k3.json - From a terminal
anchor compare granite-4-2-30b kimi-k3(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "granite-4-2-30b", "b": "kimi-k3"}at/mcp, no key