Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Granite 4.2 30B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Granite 4.2 30B leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 90
- Risk, 70 against 55
Watch for
No safety evaluation figures published
Best for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 75
Watch for
No safety results published for it
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Gemma 4 E4B IT +15
Gemma 4 E4B IT 70
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, with nothing from the repository run on load. Provenance 15, the files sit in Google's own organisation and every file has a checksum. Safety evaluation 0, the card says testing showed minimal policy violations but gives no figures. Agent guidance 10, the card names the harm categories its safety training covers and asks for content-safety safeguards, and the tool guide says to validate calls, with no prompt-injection guidance. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with no added policy, no threshold and a working link. Security programme 5, Google's security.txt and reward programme give a route to report a flaw, but no public Gemma advisories were found.
Granite 4.2 30B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the ibm-granite organisation, which IBM's Granite docs and the GitHub README link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, and the card's licence link resolves. Security programme 5, www.ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt names IBM PSIRT, read for the 3B listing on 4 November 2026 (5). 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
Documentation and upkeep Granite 4.2 30B +12
Gemma 4 E4B IT 75
Model card 20, all seven items are there. Training data 10, a general description by type with a January 2025 cut-off and the filtering, but no sources, mix or sizes. Last change 20, Google's JAX library fixed the Gemma 4 audio embedding that this size runs on 5 October 2026, 28 days before this check, while the Hugging Face files last changed on 20 July. The line drops to 15 after 4 November unless the files or reference code change. Responsiveness 10, Google replied to 12 of 26 questions and reports, the last on 2026-07-17, with the five opened from 21 September to 1 November unanswered. Version policy 10, earlier Gemma generations keep their own repositories and gemma.ai has a dated releases page. File health 5, the files agree with the card but reports about them wait without a reply. 20 + 10 + 20 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 75.
Granite 4.2 30B 87
Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 12 tested languages are on the card. Training data 20, IBM's disclosure file for the 30B lists the datasets used in pre-training and post-training as machine-readable metadata, and the card describes the three training stages. Last change 15, the last commit to the repository was on 4 September 2026, 67 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 4 discussions that aren't pull requests (28 August to 3 November 2026), 3 have a reply from an ibm-granite member. Version policy 5, Granite 4.1 30B stays in its own repository and 4.2 came out in new ones. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture, the 131,072-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 20 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 87.
Reach Gemma 4 E4B IT +5
Gemma 4 E4B IT 95
Memory 30, Google's own 4-bit QAT GGUF with its projector is 6.15 GB, which with a fifth on top is 7.4 GB and fits in 16 GB or less. Runtimes 25, released support in Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio, six of six. Builds 15, Google publishes a Q4_0 GGUF and a w4a16 build and two mobile builds, read as two kinds as for the 31B. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, no account or gate. Hosted 0, the Gemini API serves only the two largest sizes and no inference provider lists this one.
Granite 4.2 30B 90
Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB. Its Q4_0 GGUF is 16.58 GB and Ollama's library build granite4.2:30b 18 GB, the same band. Runtimes 25, Released versions run the granite architecture in llama.cpp (granite, b12242), vLLM (GraniteForCausalLM in the v0.33.0 registry), SGLang (granite.py at v0.5.23), Transformers (v5.22.2) and Ollama (its own granite4.2 library entry, 30b tag). Builds 15, IBM publishes FP8, MXFP4 and NVFP4 safetensors builds, a GGUF repository with Q4_0 to Q8_0 and BF16 files, and 4-bit, 8-bit and BF16 MLX builds, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI-approved licence, with no use policy or other terms added on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the BF16, FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX repositories, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps one inference provider (DeepInfra, live), short of the two the line needs. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Gemma 4 E4B IT | Granite 4.2 30B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 90 | Gemma 4 E4B IT +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 55 | Gemma 4 E4B IT +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 75 | 87 | Granite 4.2 30B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Gemma 4 E4B IT | Granite 4.2 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | IBM |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-09-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Gemma 4 E4B IT
A small cousin for light agent work, tool-calling loops, transcription and image reading on a phone or laptop, under Apache 2.0. Google's 4-bit build needs about 7 GB with working space and runs in all the common runtimes. Google's card puts it far below larger Gemma 4 sizes on agent and coding tasks, with no published safety results.
Granite 4.2 30B
IBM's largest reasoning cousin, with the same strengths as the 3B. It runs in every runtime we count from IBM's own builds on a 24 GB card, is signed, plain Apache 2.0, and comes with a disclosure of its training data. No safety results are published and structured output isn't documented.
Before you call either
Gemma 4 E4B IT
- On the reference machine run
llama-server -hf google/gemma-4-E4B-it-qat-q4_0-gguf --hf-file gemma-4-E4B_q4_0-it.gguf --jinja -c 131072, and add--mmprojwith gemma-4-E4B-it-mmproj.gguf for images and audio - With Ollama run
ollama run gemma4:e4band raise num_ctx or OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH, since the default context is small and agents want at least 64K - In vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as text; Google's w4a16 build is the 4-bit route there - Thinking is off by default; pass enable_thinking=True or start the system prompt with <|think|>, and drop earlier turns' thinking from history except on tool-call turns
- Put images before the text and audio after it, keep audio to 30 seconds and video to 60 frames, and validate tool names and arguments before running them
Granite 4.2 30B
- Start it with
ollama run granite4.2:30b, orllama-server -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja - With vLLM 0.32.0 or later leave out
--reasoning-parser-plugin, since the parser is built in, and use--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinkingfalse to turn it off orlow_efforttrue for short reasoning - The context is 131,072 tokens. The card's 512K extension isn't documented
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- IBM recommends Granite Guardian beside it to flag risky inputs and outputs
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Gemma 4 E4B IT or Granite 4.2 30B?
Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against Granite 4.2 30B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Granite 4.2 30B leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Gemma 4 E4B IT or Granite 4.2 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Arete-27B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Arete-27B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 30B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-granite-4-2-30b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gemma-4-e4b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/granite-4-2-30b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gemma-4-e4b-it granite-4-2-30b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gemma-4-e4b-it", "b": "granite-4-2-30b"}at/mcp, no key