Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 51.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with about 64 GB of GPU memory that want fast single-user generation from text and images and can accept lower quality than Gemma 4
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 55
Watch for
No quantised build from Google, so the smallest official build needs the 64 GB band
Best for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 60
Watch for
No safety results published for it
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Granite 4.2 30B +35
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 55
Memory earns 15 because the only Google build is 51.7 GB of BF16, about 62 GB with the fifth added, which needs the 64 GB band. Runtimes get 15 for Transformers from 5.11.0, SGLang from v0.5.22 and vLLM, whose releases from v0.24.0 (tag commit 28 June 2026) to v0.33.0 register DiffusionGemmaForBlockDiffusion; llama.cpp (b12114, and Ollama through its pin b11963) and LM Studio don't run it. Builds score 0 because Google publishes no quantised build, though others have published FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and 4-bit copies. Apache 2.0 with nothing added gives terms the full 15 and the ungated repository gives download the full 10. Hosted too scores 0, since no inference provider is mapped and the Gemini API doesn't serve it.
Granite 4.2 30B 90
Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB. Its Q4_0 GGUF is 16.58 GB and Ollama's library build granite4.2:30b 18 GB, the same band. Runtimes 25, Released versions run the granite architecture in llama.cpp (granite, b12242), vLLM (GraniteForCausalLM in the v0.33.0 registry), SGLang (granite.py at v0.5.23), Transformers (v5.22.2) and Ollama (its own granite4.2 library entry, 30b tag). Builds 15, IBM publishes FP8, MXFP4 and NVFP4 safetensors builds, a GGUF repository with Q4_0 to Q8_0 and BF16 files, and 4-bit, 8-bit and BF16 MLX builds, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI-approved licence, with no use policy or other terms added on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the BF16, FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX repositories, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps one inference provider (DeepInfra, live), short of the two the line needs. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Documentation and upkeep Granite 4.2 30B +27
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 60
The card covers all seven points (20), and the training data is a general description with a January 2025 cut-off (10). The files last changed on 15 July 2026, 112 days before this check (10). Google organisation members answered 10 of the 20 discussions (10). It's a first release (5). File health gets 5 because the diffusers scheduler config disagrees with the card's sampling settings, though the files on the documented path agree.
Granite 4.2 30B 87
Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 12 tested languages are on the card. Training data 20, IBM's disclosure file for the 30B lists the datasets used in pre-training and post-training as machine-readable metadata, and the card describes the three training stages. Last change 15, the last commit to the repository was on 4 September 2026, 67 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 4 discussions that aren't pull requests (28 August to 3 November 2026), 3 have a reply from an ibm-granite member. Version policy 5, Granite 4.1 30B stays in its own repository and 4.2 came out in new ones. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture, the 131,072-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 20 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 87.
Risk DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +15
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 70
File safety gets the full 25, safetensors only and loaded by Transformers' own code and a Jinja template. Provenance gets 15 for files in Google's organisation with a hash for every file. Licence risk keeps 15 under plain Apache 2.0. Agent guidance gets 10 for the card's list of harm categories and its advice to add content-safety safeguards. Safety evaluation scores 0 because the card states improvements without figures. The security programme gets 5 for Google's security.txt, with no public advisories for Gemma.
Granite 4.2 30B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the ibm-granite organisation, which IBM's Granite docs and the GitHub README link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, and the card's licence link resolves. Security programme 5, www.ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt names IBM PSIRT, read for the 3B listing on 4 November 2026 (5). 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
Agent interface Granite 4.2 30B +15
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 70
The chat template is in the repository (20) and handles several tool calls in one turn, and the card names function calling as trained (20). The tool-calling format gets 10, since only the template and the shipped response schema say how tools work here and Google's tool-calling guide is for Gemma 4. Structured output scores 0, undocumented and rejected by SGLang. Thinking can be turned on or off per request with the reasoning in its own channel (10), and the context is 256K (10).
Granite 4.2 30B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort. Tool-calling format 25, the card has tool-calling sections for vLLM and SGLang, declares tools with OpenAI's function schema and names the parser to use, qwen3_coder, which both runtimes ship in the released versions read. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one turn, and the card names tool calling and agentic workflows as what it's best for. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output or how to ask for it. Reasoning control 10, the card documents thinking on by default, non-thinking and low-effort modes per request through the template (enable_thinking and low_effort), with the reasoning returned apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 tokens natively per the card and config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.2 30B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 90 | Granite 4.2 30B +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 55 | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Granite 4.2 30B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 60 | 87 | Granite 4.2 30B +27 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.3/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | Granite 4.2 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | IBM |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-09-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Granite 4.2 30B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
A text diffusion model for fast low-concurrency local generation from text, images and video, with optional thinking and Gemma 4's tool format, under Apache 2.0. Google's BF16 files need about 62 GB, and it runs in Transformers, SGLang and vLLM. Google's own figures put it below Gemma 4 26B A4B, and Google labels it experimental.
Granite 4.2 30B
IBM's largest reasoning cousin, with the same strengths as the 3B. It runs in every runtime we count from IBM's own builds on a 24 GB card, is signed, plain Apache 2.0, and comes with a disclosure of its training data. No safety results are published and structured output isn't documented.
Before you call either
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Serve it with
sglang serve --model-path google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it --dllm-algorithm Gemma4Renoise --trust-remote-codeon SGLang v0.5.22 or later, then call /v1/chat/completions - In Transformers, install
transformers>=5.11.0and loadDiffusionGemmaForBlockDiffusionwithdtype="auto"; generation_config.json already holds the recommended sampler - Turn thinking on with
enable_thinking=Truein apply_chat_template or<|think|>at the start of the system prompt, read the reasoning between<|channel>thoughtand<channel|>, and drop it from history before the next turn - Don't rely on temperature, top_p, logit_bias or JSON Schema in SGLang, which ignores or rejects them for this model; validate JSON yourself
- Streaming arrives one 256-token canvas at a time, not token by token
- Put images before text in the prompt, and pick an image token budget of 70 to 1,120 by how much detail the task needs
Granite 4.2 30B
- Start it with
ollama run granite4.2:30b, orllama-server -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja - With vLLM 0.32.0 or later leave out
--reasoning-parser-plugin, since the parser is built in, and use--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinkingfalse to turn it off orlow_efforttrue for short reasoning - The context is 131,072 tokens. The card's 512K extension isn't documented
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- IBM recommends Granite Guardian beside it to flag risky inputs and outputs
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT or Granite 4.2 30B?
Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 51.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT leads on risk.
Other comparisons with DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT or Granite 4.2 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Arete-27B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Arete-27B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Carbon-X vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 30B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it-vs-granite-4-2-30b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/granite-4-2-30b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it granite-4-2-30b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it", "b": "granite-4-2-30b"}at/mcp, no key