Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
Granite 4.2 30B and Hy-Memory-30B-A3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Hy-Memory-30B-A3B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
- Agent interface, 85 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 68
Watch for
No safety results published for it
Best for Agents with an external memory framework that want a local model for the write path on a 24 GB card
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
Watch for
Not a general assistant or a tool caller
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Granite 4.2 30B +20
Granite 4.2 30B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort. Tool-calling format 25, the card has tool-calling sections for vLLM and SGLang, declares tools with OpenAI's function schema and names the parser to use, qwen3_coder, which both runtimes ship in the released versions read. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one turn, and the card names tool calling and agentic workflows as what it's best for. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output or how to ask for it. Reasoning control 10, the card documents thinking on by default, non-thinking and low-effort modes per request through the template (enable_thinking and low_effort), with the reasoning returned apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 tokens natively per the card and config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 65
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, the card doesn't mention tools. Trained tool calling 10, the template can render tool calls, but the card presents the model as a memory writer that returns memories as text or JSON and says nothing of calling tools. Structured output 5, the card's quickstart asks for a JSON object with a memories list in the system prompt and shows nothing else, no response_format and no schema, so JSON output is shown by example without a documented way to constrain it. Reasoning control 10, the card passes reasoning_effort as no_think per request through chat_template_kwargs, and the template takes high, low or no_think. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native (max_position_embeddings in config.json). 20 + 10 + 10 + 5 + 10 + 10 = 65.
Documentation and upkeep Granite 4.2 30B +19
Granite 4.2 30B 87
Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 12 tested languages are on the card. Training data 20, IBM's disclosure file for the 30B lists the datasets used in pre-training and post-training as machine-readable metadata, and the card describes the three training stages. Last change 15, the last commit to the repository was on 4 September 2026, 67 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 4 discussions that aren't pull requests (28 August to 3 November 2026), 3 have a reply from an ibm-granite member. Version policy 5, Granite 4.1 30B stays in its own repository and 4.2 came out in new ones. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture, the 131,072-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 20 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 87.
Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 68
Model card 8, Intended use (the write path of Mem0, MemOS and Hy-Memory), parameters (30B, about 3B active) and languages (English and Chinese, in the metadata) are there. Training data 5, A general description of the two training stages inside the harnesses, with no datasets, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 16 October 2026, added the licence and the card, 25 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 4 discussions that aren't pull requests (16 to 30 October 2026), 3 have a reply from a tencent organisation member. Version policy 5, A first release, with nothing replaced. File health 10, Config, tokenizer and template agree on the architecture, the context and the thinking levels. 8 + 5 + 20 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 68.
Reach Granite 4.2 30B +5
Granite 4.2 30B 90
Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB. Its Q4_0 GGUF is 16.58 GB and Ollama's library build granite4.2:30b 18 GB, the same band. Runtimes 25, Released versions run the granite architecture in llama.cpp (granite, b12242), vLLM (GraniteForCausalLM in the v0.33.0 registry), SGLang (granite.py at v0.5.23), Transformers (v5.22.2) and Ollama (its own granite4.2 library entry, 30b tag). Builds 15, IBM publishes FP8, MXFP4 and NVFP4 safetensors builds, a GGUF repository with Q4_0 to Q8_0 and BF16 files, and 4-bit, 8-bit and BF16 MLX builds, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI-approved licence, with no use policy or other terms added on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the BF16, FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX repositories, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps one inference provider (DeepInfra, live), short of the two the line needs. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 85
Memory 25, Tencent's own Q4_K_M GGUF is 18.24 GB, and 18.24 GB × 1.2 = 21.9 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB. Its Q3_K_M file and the two files with experts at 1 or 2 bits are below 4-bit precision and don't count. Runtimes 20, hy_v3 model code in released vLLM (HYV3ForCausalLM in the v0.33.0 registry), SGLang v0.5.23 (hunyuan_v3.py), Transformers v5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242, 5 each. Builds 15, Tencent publishes an FP8 repository and a GGUF repository with Q4_K_M, Q6_K and Q8_0 files in its own organisation, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, with only a preamble naming Tencent as copyright holder above the licence text. Download 10, gated is false for the main, FP8 and GGUF repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account or terms to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and the card names no API. 25 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 85.
Risk Hy-Memory-30B-A3B +5
Granite 4.2 30B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the ibm-granite organisation, which IBM's Granite docs and the GitHub README link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, field-of-use limit, threshold or change clause, and the card's licence link resolves. Security programme 5, www.ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt names IBM PSIRT, read for the 3B listing on 4 November 2026 (5). 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 60
File safety 25, 51 safetensors shards and no pickle or Python files. Provenance 15, files in the tencent organisation that the card's own resource list links to (10), with a SHA-256 listed for all 53 large files (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, no prompt-injection guidance, instruction hierarchy, account of trained refusals or general cautions on the card. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with no use policy, no field-of-use limit, no threshold and no clause letting Tencent change the terms. Security programme 5, Tencent's Security Response Center takes vulnerability reports company-wide with published reward rules, as the Hy3 listing records (5). 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 60.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Granite 4.2 30B | Hy-Memory-30B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | Granite 4.2 30B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Hy-Memory-30B-A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 65 | Granite 4.2 30B +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 87 | 68 | Granite 4.2 30B +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Granite 4.2 30B | Hy-Memory-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | IBM | Tencent (Hy team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
Verdicts
Granite 4.2 30B
IBM's largest reasoning cousin, with the same strengths as the 3B. It runs in every runtime we count from IBM's own builds on a 24 GB card, is signed, plain Apache 2.0, and comes with a disclosure of its training data. No safety results are published and structured output isn't documented.
Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
A specialist that writes an agent's long-term memory, built to slot into Mem0, MemOS or Tencent's own framework in place of a general model. It fits a 24 GB card from Tencent's own GGUF, under plain Apache 2.0, and Tencent answers on the repository. Its results are Tencent's own and nobody has rerun them.
Before you call either
Granite 4.2 30B
- Start it with
ollama run granite4.2:30b, orllama-server -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja - With vLLM 0.32.0 or later leave out
--reasoning-parser-plugin, since the parser is built in, and use--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinkingfalse to turn it off orlow_efforttrue for short reasoning - The context is 131,072 tokens. The card's 512K extension isn't documented
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- IBM recommends Granite Guardian beside it to flag risky inputs and outputs
Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Use it as the writer model in Mem0, MemOS or Hy-Memory, not as the model that answers the user
- Start it with
llama-server -hf tencent/Hy-Memory-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, or with vLLM under the served name hy-memory as the card does - Pass
reasoning_effortas no_think inchat_template_kwargsand temperature 0, as the card's example does - Ask for a JSON object in the system prompt and validate it yourself, since no schema constraint is documented
- Treat what it stores as unverified. It keeps what a conversation says, true or not
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Granite 4.2 30B or Hy-Memory-30B-A3B?
Granite 4.2 30B and Hy-Memory-30B-A3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Hy-Memory-30B-A3B leads on risk.
Other comparisons with Granite 4.2 30B or Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Arete-27B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Carbon-X vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 30B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Hy3
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Inkling
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Inkling-Small
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kolibri-1
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kronos
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Laguna M.1
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LBS-27B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-hy-memory-30b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/granite-4-2-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/hy-memory-30b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare granite-4-2-30b hy-memory-30b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "granite-4-2-30b", "b": "hy-memory-30b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key