Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 51.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with about 64 GB of GPU memory that want fast single-user generation from text and images and can accept lower quality than Gemma 4
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 60 against 36
Watch for
No quantised build from Google, so the smallest official build needs the 64 GB band
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 128 GB unified-memory machine or a 96 GB GPU setup, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 55
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +24
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 60
The card covers all seven points (20), and the training data is a general description with a January 2025 cut-off (10). The files last changed on 15 July 2026, 112 days before this check (10). Google organisation members answered 10 of the 20 discussions (10). It's a first release (5). File health gets 5 because the diffusers scheduler config disagrees with the card's sampling settings, though the files on the documented path agree.
Ornith-1.5-122B 36
Model card 11, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a description of the method with no data or cut-off. Last change 20, a folder upload to the MLX builds on 24 October 2026, 17 days ago. Responsiveness 0, Ornith answered none of the 5 questions and reports. Version policy 0, the MLX builds were uploaded a second time four days after the first with no note. File health 0, the card links a missing LICENSE, states hardware its own files don't fit and names a variant that doesn't exist, and the two chat templates differ. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 36.
Reach Ornith-1.5-122B +20
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 55
Memory earns 15 because the only Google build is 51.7 GB of BF16, about 62 GB with the fifth added, which needs the 64 GB band. Runtimes get 15 for Transformers from 5.11.0, SGLang from v0.5.22 and vLLM, whose releases from v0.24.0 (tag commit 28 June 2026) to v0.33.0 register DiffusionGemmaForBlockDiffusion; llama.cpp (b12114, and Ollama through its pin b11963) and LM Studio don't run it. Builds score 0 because Google publishes no quantised build, though others have published FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and 4-bit copies. Apache 2.0 with nothing added gives terms the full 15 and the ungated repository gives download the full 10. Hosted too scores 0, since no inference provider is mapped and the Gemini API doesn't serve it.
Ornith-1.5-122B 75
Memory 10, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 69.7 GB and needs about 83.6 GB with the fifth added, over 64 GB and inside the reference machine's 107.4 GB, as do its Q4_K_M GGUF, its NVFP4 build and Ollama's build. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture, Ollama's library and LM Studio's catalogue for the qwen35moe architecture. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it. 10 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 75.
Risk DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +20
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 70
File safety gets the full 25, safetensors only and loaded by Transformers' own code and a Jinja template. Provenance gets 15 for files in Google's organisation with a hash for every file. Licence risk keeps 15 under plain Apache 2.0. Agent guidance gets 10 for the card's list of harm categories and its advice to add content-safety safeguards. Safety evaluation scores 0 because the card states improvements without figures. The security programme gets 5 for Google's security.txt, with no public advisories for Gemma.
Ornith-1.5-122B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Agent interface Ornith-1.5-122B +15
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 70
The chat template is in the repository (20) and handles several tool calls in one turn, and the card names function calling as trained (20). The tool-calling format gets 10, since only the template and the shipped response schema say how tools work here and Google's tool-calling guide is for Gemma 4. Structured output scores 0, undocumented and rejected by SGLang. Thinking can be turned on or off per request with the reasoning in its own channel (10), and the context is 256K (10).
Ornith-1.5-122B 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card shows how tools go in and how calls come back and names the parser for vLLM and SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, Ornith trains it on agent tasks and the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, Ornith's template reads enable_thinking per request and the card says the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content, though the card doesn't name the switch. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | Ornith-1.5-122B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 75 | Ornith-1.5-122B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 50 | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-122B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 60 | 36 | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.3/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | Ornith-1.5-122B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Ornith-1.5-122B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
A text diffusion model for fast low-concurrency local generation from text, images and video, with optional thinking and Gemma 4's tool format, under Apache 2.0. Google's BF16 files need about 62 GB, and it runs in Transformers, SGLang and vLLM. Google's own figures put it below Gemma 4 26B A4B, and Google labels it experimental.
Ornith-1.5-122B
The largest Ornith that fits a 128 GB machine, a coding and terminal-agent cousin on Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's architecture with XML tool calls and 262,144 tokens of context. Its 4-bit builds need 84 to 93 GB. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies, and a card that misstates the hardware.
Before you call either
DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Serve it with
sglang serve --model-path google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it --dllm-algorithm Gemma4Renoise --trust-remote-codeon SGLang v0.5.22 or later, then call /v1/chat/completions - In Transformers, install
transformers>=5.11.0and loadDiffusionGemmaForBlockDiffusionwithdtype="auto"; generation_config.json already holds the recommended sampler - Turn thinking on with
enable_thinking=Truein apply_chat_template or<|think|>at the start of the system prompt, read the reasoning between<|channel>thoughtand<channel|>, and drop it from history before the next turn - Don't rely on temperature, top_p, logit_bias or JSON Schema in SGLang, which ignores or rejects them for this model; validate JSON yourself
- Streaming arrives one 256-token canvas at a time, not token by token
- Put images before text in the prompt, and pick an image token budget of 70 to 1,120 by how much detail the task needs
Ornith-1.5-122B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:122b-q4_K_M, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 262144 - Budget about 92 GB for the Q4_K_M GGUF with a working context, and less context if the machine has under 100 GB for the model
- In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 for general tasks, as the card recommends
- Add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-122B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp, and validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT or Ornith-1.5-122B?
Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 51.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT or Ornith-1.5-122B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Arete-27B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- BigBang-v1 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Carbon-X vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it-vs-ornith-1-5-122b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-122b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it ornith-1-5-122b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it", "b": "ornith-1-5-122b"}at/mcp, no key