Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-122B
Apodex-1.1-mini and Ornith-1.5-122B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Long-running agent tasks with tools on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, or through Apodex's API, under a plain licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Risk, 65 against 50
Watch for
No safety results, and agent guidance only from the harness
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 128 GB unified-memory machine or a 96 GB GPU setup, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Apodex-1.1-mini +15
Apodex-1.1-mini 65
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and nothing from the repositories runs. Provenance 15, the files are in the apodex organisation its site links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file and a SHA256SUMS file for the GGUF. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 5, the recommended harness documents approval gates and a sandbox boundary, but nothing on prompt injection or refusals for the model. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 from Qwen3.5-35B-A3B through to this model with no conditions added. Security programme 5, the harness has a disclosure policy with a private address, with no route shown for the weights.
Ornith-1.5-122B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Reach Apodex-1.1-mini +10
Apodex-1.1-mini 85
Memory 20, Apodex's Q4_K_M GGUF with its vision projector is 22.6 GB and needs about 27.1 GB with the fifth added, so 32 GB, as do its NVFP4 and GPTQ-Int4 builds. Runtimes 20, the Qwen3.5 MoE architecture runs in released vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp, while Ollama's and LM Studio's entries are the base's, not this model's. Builds 15, Apodex publishes FP8, NVFP4, GPTQ-Int4 and GGUF. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 5, Apodex's own API serves it.
Ornith-1.5-122B 75
Memory 10, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 69.7 GB and needs about 83.6 GB with the fifth added, over 64 GB and inside the reference machine's 107.4 GB, as do its Q4_K_M GGUF, its NVFP4 build and Ollama's build. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture, Ollama's library and LM Studio's catalogue for the qwen35moe architecture. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it. 10 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 75.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Apodex-1.1-mini | Ornith-1.5-122B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 75 | Apodex-1.1-mini +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 50 | Apodex-1.1-mini +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 38 | 36 | Apodex-1.1-mini +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Apodex-1.1-mini | Ornith-1.5-122B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Apodex AI | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-25 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Apodex-1.1-mini
An agent cousin fine-tuned from Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for long tasks with files, code and tools, with parallel tool calling and about 3B active parameters. It needs 32 GB for Apodex's GGUF, NVFP4 or GPTQ-Int4 builds or about 86 GB in BF16, and Apodex's API serves it too. The main risks are no safety results and no replies from the publisher.
Ornith-1.5-122B
The largest Ornith that fits a 128 GB machine, a coding and terminal-agent cousin on Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's architecture with XML tool calls and 262,144 tokens of context. Its 4-bit builds need 84 to 93 GB. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies, and a card that misstates the hardware.
Before you call either
Apodex-1.1-mini
- Serve it with
vllm serve apodex/Apodex-1.1-mini --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, or the same parsers in SGLang, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - For llama.cpp,
llama-server -hf apodex/Apodex-1.1-mini-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja --reasoning-format deepseek, and the card passes the repository's chat_template.jinja with --chat-template-file - Pass tools through the API's tools parameter rather than in the system prompt, as the card asks
- The card recommends temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, repetition_penalty 1.05 and max_tokens up to 32,768
- Send your own system prompt, or set identity_mode, since the template otherwise adds an Apodex identity block
- The template keeps all earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Thinking is on by default, send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - The card's Python example has a broken line where it runs the tool (available_toolsname), so fix it to
available_tools[name](**args)before running - Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Ornith-1.5-122B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:122b-q4_K_M, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 262144 - Budget about 92 GB for the Q4_K_M GGUF with a working context, and less context if the machine has under 100 GB for the model
- In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 for general tasks, as the card recommends
- Add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-122B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp, and validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Apodex-1.1-mini or Ornith-1.5-122B?
Apodex-1.1-mini and Ornith-1.5-122B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C).
Other comparisons with Apodex-1.1-mini or Ornith-1.5-122B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Apodex-1.1-mini
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Apodex-1.1-mini
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Arete-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs BigBang-v1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Carbon-X
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Hy3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling-Small
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kolibri-1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kronos
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna M.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LBS-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-1.7B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Mistral Large 4
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs occamy-1.0
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/apodex-1-1-mini-vs-ornith-1-5-122b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/apodex-1-1-mini.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-122b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare apodex-1-1-mini ornith-1-5-122b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "apodex-1-1-mini", "b": "ornith-1-5-122b"}at/mcp, no key