Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-o 4.5's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons
Gemma 4 E4B ITGoogle DeepMind · Open-weight model
B63.2/100#24 of 100 open-weight models
MiniCPM-o 4.5OpenBMB · Open-weight model
C61/100#42 of 100 open-weight models
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 90
- Risk, 70 against 40
- Agent interface, 85 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 66
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
No safety evaluation figures published
Best for Agents that need a local model to see, hear and speak on a laptop or a single small GPU, with a plain licence.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Speech output and full duplex need trust_remote_code with Transformers 4.51.0 or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Gemma 4 E4B IT | MiniCPM-o 4.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 90 | Gemma 4 E4B IT +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 40 | Gemma 4 E4B IT +30 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 35 | Gemma 4 E4B IT +50 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 75 | 66 | Gemma 4 E4B IT +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Gemma 4 E4B IT | MiniCPM-o 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0; built from Qwen3-8B, SigLIP2, Whisper-medium and CosyVoice2, all Apache 2.0 on their Hub cards |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Gemma 4 E4B IT
A small cousin for light agent work, tool-calling loops, transcription and image reading on a phone or laptop, under Apache 2.0. Google's 4-bit build needs about 7 GB with working space and runs in all the common runtimes. Google's card puts it far below larger Gemma 4 sizes on agent and coding tasks, with no published safety results.
MiniCPM-o 4.5
A small omni cousin that sees, listens and talks back, with full-duplex speech and voice cloning, in about 7 GB at 4-bit through llama.cpp or Ollama for text and images. Speech output needs OpenBMB's remote code or llama.cpp-omni, and 28 GB of GPU for the full demo. The main risks are repository code and pickle files and no safety results.
Before you call either
Gemma 4 E4B IT
- On the reference machine run
llama-server -hf google/gemma-4-E4B-it-qat-q4_0-gguf --hf-file gemma-4-E4B_q4_0-it.gguf --jinja -c 131072, and add--mmprojwith gemma-4-E4B-it-mmproj.gguf for images and audio - With Ollama run
ollama run gemma4:e4band raise num_ctx or OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH, since the default context is small and agents want at least 64K - In vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as text; Google's w4a16 build is the 4-bit route there - Thinking is off by default; pass enable_thinking=True or start the system prompt with <|think|>, and drop earlier turns' thinking from history except on tool-call turns
- Put images before the text and audio after it, keep audio to 30 seconds and video to 60 frames, and validate tool names and arguments before running them
MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Quickest start for text and images is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm-o4.5, about 6 GB - With vLLM 0.16.0 or later pass
--trust-remote-code, and sendstop_token_ids[151643, 151645] as OpenBMB's guide does - vLLM, llama.cpp and Ollama return text only; for speech out use the card's Transformers 4.51.0 code or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
- In llama.cpp pass both the language GGUF and MiniCPM-o-4_5-vision-F16.gguf with
--mmproj, and use--jinja --reasoning-budget 0to turn thinking off - Keep prompts within 40,960 tokens
- Don't rely on tool calls or JSON output, neither is documented; validate any you get
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Gemma 4 E4B IT or MiniCPM-o 4.5?
Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-o 4.5's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Gemma 4 E4B IT or MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-minicpm-o-4-5.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gemma-4-e4b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-o-4-5.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gemma-4-e4b-it minicpm-o-4-5(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gemma-4-e4b-it", "b": "minicpm-o-4-5"}at/mcp, no key