Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT
Ahead on
- Risk, 50 against 40
- Agent interface, 60 against 35
Watch for
No hosted provider today, and Ollama support is only an unmerged pull request
Best for Agents that need a local model to see, hear and speak on a laptop or a single small GPU, with a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 66 against 56
Watch for
Speech output and full duplex need trust_remote_code with Transformers 4.51.0 or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.0-tiny | MiniCPM-o 4.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 40 | Ling-3.0-tiny +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 35 | Ling-3.0-tiny +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 66 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.0-tiny | MiniCPM-o 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0; built from Qwen3-8B, SigLIP2, Whisper-medium and CosyVoice2, all Apache 2.0 on their Hub cards |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ling-3.0-tiny
A small, quick hybrid reasoning cousin for local agent work, tool calls and coding, under MIT. It runs in about 6 GB from inclusionAI's 4-bit GGUF in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp, with no host. The main risks are a card that doesn't match the files in places, the vLLM route running repository code, and no model safety results.
MiniCPM-o 4.5
A small omni cousin that sees, listens and talks back, with full-duplex speech and voice cloning, in about 7 GB at 4-bit through llama.cpp or Ollama for text and images. Speech output needs OpenBMB's remote code or llama.cpp-omni, and 28 GB of GPU for the full demo. The main risks are repository code and pickle files and no safety results.
Before you call either
Ling-3.0-tiny
- Start it with
llama-server -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, which needs llama.cpp b11772 or a recent release with bailingmoe3 - With vLLM 0.32.0,
vllm serve inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny --trust-remote-code --enable-prefix-caching --mamba-cache-mode align --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser ling3 --reasoning-parser ling3, which runs the repository's config code - With SGLang 0.5.22, its cookbook uses
--reasoning-parser deepseek-r1 --tool-call-parser glm45for this model, and drop the card's NEXTN flags since tiny has no MTP layer - Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20
- The template keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt, which grows long agent sessions
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- For a guardrail, inclusionAI's Ling-3.0-tiny-singprobe scores intent, unsafe output and hallucination per token, but only through SGLang and vLLM integration branches
MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Quickest start for text and images is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm-o4.5, about 6 GB - With vLLM 0.16.0 or later pass
--trust-remote-code, and sendstop_token_ids[151643, 151645] as OpenBMB's guide does - vLLM, llama.cpp and Ollama return text only; for speech out use the card's Transformers 4.51.0 code or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
- In llama.cpp pass both the language GGUF and MiniCPM-o-4_5-vision-F16.gguf with
--mmproj, and use--jinja --reasoning-budget 0to turn thinking off - Keep prompts within 40,960 tokens
- Don't rely on tool calls or JSON output, neither is documented; validate any you get
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.0-tiny or MiniCPM-o 4.5?
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.0-tiny or MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-minicpm-o-4-5.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-o-4-5.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-0-tiny minicpm-o-4-5(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-0-tiny", "b": "minicpm-o-4-5"}at/mcp, no key