Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kronos vs Ling-3.0-tiny
Kronos and Ling-3.0-tiny score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 55.2 (C) and 55 (C). Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Kronos C
Best for Agents that need a quick local forecast or synthetic sample of a candlestick series on modest hardware, for research or as one input among others.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 61 against 56
Watch for
Runs only through the publisher's own PyTorch code from GitHub, in no named runtime and with no quantised build
Best for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
Watch for
No hosted provider today, and Ollama support is only an unmerged pull request
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kronos | Ling-3.0-tiny | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 90 | Ling-3.0-tiny +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 61 | 56 | Kronos +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55.2/100 | C 55/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kronos | Ling-3.0-tiny |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Yu Shi (shiyu-coder, NeoQuasar), Tsinghua University | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-13 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 43k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kronos
Forecasts the next price bars from a history of up to 512 candlestick bars. Every size fits in under 0.5 GB and runs on a CPU, but only through the publisher's own Python package. Nobody has benchmarked it independently, its quickstart data was deleted from the repository, and the publisher hasn't replied since November 2025.
Ling-3.0-tiny
A small, quick hybrid reasoning cousin for local agent work, tool calls and coding, under MIT. It runs in about 6 GB from inclusionAI's 4-bit GGUF in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp, with no host. The main risks are a card that doesn't match the files in places, the vLLM route running repository code, and no model safety results.
Before you call either
Kronos
- Clone https://github.com/shiyu-coder/Kronos and
pip install -r requirements.txt, then loadKronos.from_pretrained("NeoQuasar/Kronos-small")andKronosTokenizer.from_pretrained("NeoQuasar/Kronos-Tokenizer-base")and wrap them in KronosPredictor - Pair Kronos-mini with Kronos-Tokenizer-2k and Kronos-small or Kronos-base with Kronos-Tokenizer-base, the cards' pairing
- The examples read examples/data/XSHG_5min_600977.csv, which no longer exists; point them at tests/data/regression_input.csv, 2,500 five-minute bars
- Keep the lookback at or under max_context, 512 bars, and pass the future timestamps you want as y_timestamp, since the calendar fields come from them
- Raise sample_count for a steadier forecast, but expect only the mean back; call the lower-level auto_regressive_inference yourself if you need the paths
- Treat forecasts as model output to check, not signals; the README says its own backtest pipeline isn't a production trading system
Ling-3.0-tiny
- Start it with
llama-server -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, which needs llama.cpp b11772 or a recent release with bailingmoe3 - With vLLM 0.32.0,
vllm serve inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny --trust-remote-code --enable-prefix-caching --mamba-cache-mode align --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser ling3 --reasoning-parser ling3, which runs the repository's config code - With SGLang 0.5.22, its cookbook uses
--reasoning-parser deepseek-r1 --tool-call-parser glm45for this model, and drop the card's NEXTN flags since tiny has no MTP layer - Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20
- The template keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt, which grows long agent sessions
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- For a guardrail, inclusionAI's Ling-3.0-tiny-singprobe scores intent, unsafe output and hallucination per token, but only through SGLang and vLLM integration branches
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kronos or Ling-3.0-tiny?
Kronos and Ling-3.0-tiny score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 55.2 (C) and 55 (C). Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Kronos or Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kronos
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kronos
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kronos
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- BigBang-v1 vs Kronos
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Carbon-X vs Kronos
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kronos
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kronos
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kronos
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kronos
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kronos
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs Kronos
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs Kronos
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs Kronos
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kronos
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs Kronos
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs Kronos
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kronos vs Laguna M.1
- Kronos vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kronos vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kronos vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kronos vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kronos vs occamy-1.0
- Kronos vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kronos vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kronos vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kronos vs Recursive Flint
- Kronos vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kronos vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kronos-vs-ling-3-0-tiny.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kronos.json·/api/v1/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kronos ling-3-0-tiny(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kronos", "b": "ling-3-0-tiny"}at/mcp, no key