Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kronos vs MiniCPM5-2B
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Kronos's 55.2 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Kronos C
Best for Agents that need a quick local forecast or synthetic sample of a candlestick series on modest hardware, for research or as one input among others.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Runs only through the publisher's own PyTorch code from GitHub, in no named runtime and with no quantised build
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 61
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kronos | MiniCPM5-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 90 | MiniCPM5-2B +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 75 | MiniCPM5-2B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 61 | 97 | MiniCPM5-2B +36 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55.2/100 | C 60.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kronos | MiniCPM5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Yu Shi (shiyu-coder, NeoQuasar), Tsinghua University | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-13 | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 43k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kronos
Forecasts the next price bars from a history of up to 512 candlestick bars. Every size fits in under 0.5 GB and runs on a CPU, but only through the publisher's own Python package. Nobody has benchmarked it independently, its quickstart data was deleted from the repository, and the publisher hasn't replied since November 2025.
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
Kronos
- Clone https://github.com/shiyu-coder/Kronos and
pip install -r requirements.txt, then loadKronos.from_pretrained("NeoQuasar/Kronos-small")andKronosTokenizer.from_pretrained("NeoQuasar/Kronos-Tokenizer-base")and wrap them in KronosPredictor - Pair Kronos-mini with Kronos-Tokenizer-2k and Kronos-small or Kronos-base with Kronos-Tokenizer-base, the cards' pairing
- The examples read examples/data/XSHG_5min_600977.csv, which no longer exists; point them at tests/data/regression_input.csv, 2,500 five-minute bars
- Keep the lookback at or under max_context, 512 bars, and pass the future timestamps you want as y_timestamp, since the calendar fields come from them
- Raise sample_count for a steadier forecast, but expect only the mean back; call the lower-level auto_regressive_inference yourself if you need the paths
- Treat forecasts as model output to check, not signals; the README says its own backtest pipeline isn't a production trading system
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kronos or MiniCPM5-2B?
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Kronos's 55.2 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Kronos or MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kronos
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kronos
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kronos
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Kronos
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Carbon-X vs Kronos
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kronos
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kronos
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kronos
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kronos
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kronos
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Kronos
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kronos
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Kronos
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Kronos
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Kronos
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kronos
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Kronos
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Kronos
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kronos vs Laguna M.1
- Kronos vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kronos vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kronos vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kronos vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kronos vs occamy-1.0
- Kronos vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kronos vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kronos vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kronos vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kronos vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kronos vs Recursive Flint
- Kronos vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kronos vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kronos-vs-minicpm5-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kronos.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kronos minicpm5-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kronos", "b": "minicpm5-2b"}at/mcp, no key