Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM5-2B's 60.2 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 70
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 39
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Agents with access to an 8-GPU server, or calling a hosted endpoint, that want the strongest open Qwen3.5 with vision and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Capability, 72 against 27
Watch for
No build fits a 256 GB machine, and Ollama has no local build
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 27 | 72 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B +45 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 70 | MiniCPM5-2B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 39 | MiniCPM5-2B +58 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | B 64.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-02-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Alibaba's biggest open Qwen3.5, a cousin for hard coding, agent and vision work. Even at 4 bits it needs about 270 GB, so most agents will call it through Alibaba's Model Studio or one of the many providers that host it. The main risk is silence, with no safety results, no agent guidance and template reports without a reply.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- The card's server command is
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B --port 8000 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, and the FP8 build halves the memory - It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any precision, so call a hosted endpoint instead (Model Studio's Qwen3.5-Plus, or a provider serving Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B)
- On Model Studio pass
"enable_thinking": falsedirectly, while vLLM and SGLang take"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false} - Sampling per the card is temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20 when thinking, and temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- For multi-token prediction in vLLM add
--speculative-config '{"method":"qwen3_next_mtp","num_speculative_tokens":2}' - Keep the context at 128K or more if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only past 262,144 tokens
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM5-2B's 60.2 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-397b-a17b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b qwen3-5-397b-a17b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "qwen3-5-397b-a17b"}at/mcp, no key