Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Gemma 4 E2B IT's 60.4 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Gemma 4 E2B IT leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 70
- Risk, 70 against 55
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 39
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
No safety evaluation figures published
Best for Agents with access to an 8-GPU server, or calling a hosted endpoint, that want the strongest open Qwen3.5 with vision and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Capability, 72 against 19
Watch for
No build fits a 256 GB machine, and Ollama has no local build
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Gemma 4 E2B IT | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 19 | 72 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B +53 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 70 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 55 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 75 | 39 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +36 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.4/100 | B 64.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Gemma 4 E2B IT | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-02-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Gemma 4 E2B IT
A small cousin for light agent work, tool-calling loops, transcription and image reading on a phone or laptop, under Apache 2.0. Google's 4-bit build needs about 5 GB with working space and runs in all the common runtimes. Google's card puts it far below larger Gemma 4 sizes on agent and coding tasks, with no published safety results.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Alibaba's biggest open Qwen3.5, a cousin for hard coding, agent and vision work. Even at 4 bits it needs about 270 GB, so most agents will call it through Alibaba's Model Studio or one of the many providers that host it. The main risk is silence, with no safety results, no agent guidance and template reports without a reply.
Before you call either
Gemma 4 E2B IT
- On the reference machine run
llama-server -hf google/gemma-4-E2B-it-qat-q4_0-gguf --hf-file gemma-4-E2B_q4_0-it.gguf --jinja -c 131072, and add--mmprojwith gemma-4-E2B-it-mmproj.gguf for images and audio - With Ollama run
ollama run gemma4:e2band raise num_ctx or OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH, since the default context is small and agents want at least 64K - In vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as text; Google's w4a16 build is the 4-bit route there - Thinking is off by default; pass enable_thinking=True or start the system prompt with <|think|>, and drop earlier turns' thinking from history except on tool-call turns
- Put images before the text and audio after it, keep audio to 30 seconds and video to 60 frames, and validate tool names and arguments before running them
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- The card's server command is
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B --port 8000 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, and the FP8 build halves the memory - It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any precision, so call a hosted endpoint instead (Model Studio's Qwen3.5-Plus, or a provider serving Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B)
- On Model Studio pass
"enable_thinking": falsedirectly, while vLLM and SGLang take"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false} - Sampling per the card is temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20 when thinking, and temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- For multi-token prediction in vLLM add
--speculative-config '{"method":"qwen3_next_mtp","num_speculative_tokens":2}' - Keep the context at 128K or more if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only past 262,144 tokens
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Gemma 4 E2B IT or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Gemma 4 E2B IT's 60.4 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Gemma 4 E2B IT leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Gemma 4 E2B IT or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- BigBang-v1 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gemma-4-e2b-it-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gemma-4-e2b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-397b-a17b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gemma-4-e2b-it qwen3-5-397b-a17b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gemma-4-e2b-it", "b": "qwen3-5-397b-a17b"}at/mcp, no key