Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507's 56.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 C

Best for Agents that want a fast, capable instruct model on one 24 GB GPU or a 32 GB Mac, with a plain licence and long context.

Ahead on

  • Reach, 90 against 70
  • Agent interface, 75 against 70

Watch for

No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B B

Best for Agents with access to an 8-GPU server, or calling a hosted endpoint, that want the strongest open Qwen3.5 with vision and a plain licence.

Ahead on

  • Capability, 72 against 37
  • Documentation and upkeep, 39 against 26

Watch for

No build fits a 256 GB machine, and Ollama has no local build

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Qwen3.5-397B-A17BEdge
Capability35%353772Qwen3.5-397B-A17B +35
Reach25%259070Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 +20
Risk20%205555even
Agent interface10%107570Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 +5
Documentation and upkeep10%102639Qwen3.5-397B-A17B +13
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 56.6/100B 64.6/100

Facts side by side

FactQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorAlibaba (Qwen team)Alibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2025-09-172026-02-16
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

A quick general-purpose cousin, with 3.3B of 30.5B parameters active per token, for instruction following, tool calling and long documents without a thinking step. It needs about 21 to 23 GB at 4 bits, and several providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes in over a year, no answers from Alibaba and no safety results.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Alibaba's biggest open Qwen3.5, a cousin for hard coding, agent and vision work. Even at 4 bits it needs about 270 GB, so most agents will call it through Alibaba's Model Studio or one of the many providers that host it. The main risk is silence, with no safety results, no agent guidance and template reports without a reply.

Before you call either

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

  1. Quickest start is ollama run qwen3:30b-instruct, 19 GB. Plain qwen3:30b and qwen3:30b-a3b are the Thinking-2507 edition, not this one
  2. On our reference machine use BF16 with vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes, 61 GB of weights fits the GPU share
  3. Use the hermes parser in vLLM or qwen25 in SGLang, the template emits JSON inside tool_call tags
  4. Don't pass enable_thinking, this edition never thinks and the card says the flag isn't needed
  5. Sampling per the card is temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and min_p 0, with presence_penalty up to 2 against repetition
  6. Leave config.json as it is unless you need more than 262,144 tokens, the 1M mode swaps in config_1m.json and runs one sequence at a time
  7. Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

  1. The card's server command is vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B --port 8000 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, and the FP8 build halves the memory
  2. It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any precision, so call a hosted endpoint instead (Model Studio's Qwen3.5-Plus, or a provider serving Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B)
  3. On Model Studio pass "enable_thinking": false directly, while vLLM and SGLang take "chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false}
  4. Sampling per the card is temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20 when thinking, and temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
  5. For multi-token prediction in vLLM add --speculative-config '{"method":"qwen3_next_mtp","num_speculative_tokens":2}'
  6. Keep the context at 128K or more if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only past 262,144 tokens
  7. Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507's 56.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach and agent interface.

Other comparisons with Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.