Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B and Gemma 4 E2B IT score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.4 (C). Gemma 4 E2B IT leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 90
- Risk, 70 against 55
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 68
Watch for
No safety evaluation figures published
Best for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Gemma 4 E2B IT +15
Gemma 4 E2B IT 70
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, with nothing from the repository run on load. Provenance 15, the files sit in Google's own organisation and every file has a checksum. Safety evaluation 0, the card says testing showed minimal policy violations but gives no figures. Agent guidance 10, the card names the harm categories its safety training covers and asks for content-safety safeguards, and the tool guide says to validate calls, with no prompt-injection guidance. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with no added policy, no threshold and a working link. Security programme 5, Google's security.txt and reward programme give a route to report a flaw, but no public Gemma advisories were found.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed. Provenance 15, the files come from the openbmb organisation OpenBMB's GitHub README links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either, and the card has no limitations section. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no security.txt or SECURITY.md.
Agent interface Gemma 4 E2B IT +15
Gemma 4 E2B IT 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, Google documents how tools are declared and how calls come back, and ships a response schema for Transformers' parser. Trained tool calling 20, several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, nothing documents how to ask the weights for JSON or a schema. Reasoning control 10, thinking is off by default, turned on per request, and returned in a thought channel. Context 10, 131,072 tokens native, which meets the 128K line.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows the tools array going in but not the call coming back, and names no parser. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request, off by default, with the trace between markers. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Documentation and upkeep Gemma 4 E2B IT +7
Gemma 4 E2B IT 75
Model card 20, all seven items are there. Training data 10, a general description by type with a January 2025 cut-off and the filtering, but no sources, mix or sizes. Last change 20, Google merged a fix for 233 glitch tokens in tokenizer.json on 3 November 2026, a day before 4 November. Responsiveness 10, Google replied to 9 of 24 questions and reports, the last on 2026-09-15, re-counted on 4 November. Version policy 10, earlier Gemma generations keep their own repositories and gemma.ai has a dated releases page. File health 5, the files agree with the card but a report about them waits without a reply.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68
Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 0, none described. Last change 20, a commit on 3 November 2026. Responsiveness 20, OpenBMB answered 8 of 12 discussions. Version policy 10, earlier versions keep their repositories and the changes are dated and described. File health 10, the files agree. 8 + 0 + 20 + 20 + 10 + 10 = 68.
Reach Gemma 4 E2B IT +5
Gemma 4 E2B IT 95
Memory 30, Google's own 4-bit QAT GGUF with its projector is 4.34 GB, which with a fifth on top is 5.2 GB and fits in 16 GB or less. Runtimes 25, released support in Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio, six of six. Builds 15, Google publishes a Q4_0 GGUF and a w4a16 build and two mobile builds, read as two kinds as for the 31B. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, no account or gate. Hosted 0, the Gemini API serves only the two largest sizes and no inference provider lists this one.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90
Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGUF, 4-bit safetensors builds and Ollama entry need 32 GB. Runtimes 25, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.18.0 and later, llama.cpp's own MiniCPM-V 4.7 support and OpenBMB's entry on Ollama. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes FP8, three 4-bit safetensors builds and GGUF. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider is mapped. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Gemma 4 E2B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 90 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 55 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 75 | 68 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.4/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Gemma 4 E2B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Gemma 4 E2B IT
A small open-weight model for light agent work, tool calls, short audio and images on a phone or laptop, under Apache 2.0. Google's 4-bit build needs about 5 GB with working space and runs in all the common runtimes. Google's card puts it far below larger Gemma 4 sizes on agent and coding tasks, and no safety results are published.
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
A vision-language cousin for images and video that fits a 24 to 32 GB machine from OpenBMB's own GGUF, under plain Apache 2.0, with a publisher that answers. The card says little about limits, training data or how tool calls come back, so test the tool format in your runtime before relying on it.
Before you call either
Gemma 4 E2B IT
- On the reference machine run
llama-server -hf google/gemma-4-E2B-it-qat-q4_0-gguf --hf-file gemma-4-E2B_q4_0-it.gguf --jinja -c 131072, and add--mmprojwith gemma-4-E2B-it-mmproj.gguf for images and audio - With Ollama run
ollama run gemma4:e2band raise num_ctx or OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH, since the default context is small and agents want at least 64K - In vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as text; Google's w4a16 build is the 4-bit route there - Thinking is off by default; pass enable_thinking=True or start the system prompt with <|think|>, and drop earlier turns' thinking from history except on tool-call turns
- Put images before the text and audio after it, keep audio to 30 seconds and video to 60 frames, and validate tool names and arguments before running them
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:35b-a3b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the 4x projector for more visual detail at a higher cost - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - With Transformers pass
enable_thinkingtoapply_chat_template, and passdownsample_modeto bothapply_chat_templateandgenerate - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser. The template uses the Qwen3.5 function-block format
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Gemma 4 E2B IT or MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B?
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B and Gemma 4 E2B IT score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.4 (C). Gemma 4 E2B IT leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Gemma 4 E2B IT or MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kronos
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Mistral Large 4
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gemma-4-e2b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gemma-4-e2b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gemma-4-e2b-it minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gemma-4-e2b-it", "b": "minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key