Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
Watch for
No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Recursive Flint +20
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, the card shows the tools array going in but not the call coming back, and names no parser. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request, off by default, with the trace between markers. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Recursive Flint 90
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository and inside both GGUFs. Tool-calling format 25, Recursive's serving README documents how tools go in, how calls come back and the flint parser. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn. Structured output 15, response_format with JSON Schema is documented. Reasoning control 0, the model decides when to reason and Recursive says there's no switch or budget. Context 10, 262,144 tokens with no position scaling.
Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90
Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGUF, 4-bit safetensors builds and Ollama entry need 32 GB. Runtimes 25, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.18.0 and later, llama.cpp's own MiniCPM-V 4.7 support and OpenBMB's entry on Ollama. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes FP8, three 4-bit safetensors builds and GGUF. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no inference provider is mapped. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
Recursive Flint 85
Memory 20 of 30, Recursive's MLX INT4 build is 22.6 GB, or 27.1 GB with a fifth added, which fits 32 GB, and every other 4-bit build lands in the same band. Runtimes 25 of 25, released llama.cpp (b11803), Ollama 0.40.8, LM Studio's catalogue, Transformers v5.21 and vLLM v0.33.0 run it, while SGLang has only a development image. Builds 15, MLX INT4 plus Q4_1 and NVFP4 GGUFs from Recursive. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, OpenRouter lists a free endpoint with Recursive as its provider, but it wasn't serving on 3 November 2026, with 0 per cent uptime over the last day.
Risk Recursive Flint +5
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed. Provenance 15, the files come from the openbmb organisation OpenBMB's GitHub README links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either, and the card has no limitations section. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no security.txt or SECURITY.md.
Recursive Flint 60
File safety 15 of 25, safetensors and GGUF only, but the card's documented BF16 route installs the wheel shipped in the repository. Provenance 15, the files are in the RecursiveSI organisation that Recursive's own engine downloads from, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, none on the cards or in the announcement post. Agent guidance 10, the card and serving README say to enforce permissions around tool use and to strip tool tags from untrusted tool output, but there's no trained instruction hierarchy. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 5, a reporting address on the card and a private reporting route for the engine, with no public advisories yet.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Recursive Flint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Recursive Flint +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 90 | Recursive Flint +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 68 | 67 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Recursive Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Recursive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
A vision-language cousin for images and video that fits a 24 to 32 GB machine from OpenBMB's own GGUF, under plain Apache 2.0, with a publisher that answers. The card says little about limits, training data or how tool calls come back, so test the tool format in your runtime before relying on it.
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. Released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM and Transformers run it, while Recursive's free OpenRouter endpoint wasn't serving on 3 November 2026. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
Before you call either
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, orollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:35b-a3b - For image input in llama.cpp add
mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the 4x projector for more visual detail at a higher cost - The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in
thinking/when you want the trace - With Transformers pass
enable_thinkingtoapply_chat_template, and passdownsample_modeto bothapply_chat_templateandgenerate - Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
- Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser. The template uses the Qwen3.5 function-block format
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
- Check OpenRouter's endpoints list before calling recursive/flint-v1.0:free, since its only endpoint (Recursive, BF16) showed 0 per cent uptime over the last day on 3 November 2026
- vLLM needs v0.33.0 or later and Transformers v5.21 or later; released SGLang has no Flint model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B or Recursive Flint?
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B or Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- Mistral Large 4 vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Recursive Flint vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Recursive Flint vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-recursive-flint.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json·/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b recursive-flint(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b", "b": "recursive-flint"}at/mcp, no key