# MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint (slim)

> MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-recursive-flint.md (~9,650 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-recursive-flint.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-recursive-flint
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B: C 61, rank #77 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.min.md
- Recursive Flint: C 61, rank #54 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/recursive-flint.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B, good for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85.
- Recursive Flint, good for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence. Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 90 against 70.

| Category | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Recursive Flint |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 60 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 90 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 68 | 67 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Recursive Flint |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Recursive |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-21 |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Agent interface, Recursive Flint +20: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); Recursive Flint 90 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository and inside both GGUFs.)
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90 (Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGU…); Recursive Flint 85 (Memory 20 of 30, Recursive's MLX INT4 build is 22.6 GB, or 27.1 GB with a fifth added, which fits 32 GB, and every other 4-bit build lands in the same band.)
- Risk, Recursive Flint +5: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed.); Recursive Flint 60 (File safety 15 of 25, safetensors and GGUF only, but the card's documented BF16 route installs the wheel shipped in the repository.)