Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
Recursive Flint scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3023 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 60
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a fast sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 90 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 67 against 52
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olmo 3 7B Think | Recursive Flint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 75 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 60 | Olmo 3 7B Think +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 35 | 90 | Recursive Flint +55 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 52 | 67 | Recursive Flint +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 52.3/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olmo 3 7B Think | Recursive Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) | Recursive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-06-25 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning cousin for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. It needs llama.cpp b11803 or Ollama 0.40.8 or later, and the BF16 checkpoint needs a 141 GB GPU. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
Before you call either
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Olmo 3 7B Think or Recursive Flint?
Recursive Flint scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk.
Other comparisons with Olmo 3 7B Think or Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/olmo-3-7b-think-vs-recursive-flint.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json·/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json - From a terminal
anchor compare olmo-3-7b-think recursive-flint(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "olmo-3-7b-think", "b": "recursive-flint"}at/mcp, no key