Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
Recursive Flint scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview's 51.2 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3023 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview D
Best for Agents with 64 GB to spare that want an Apache-licensed image and video reader with optional thinking and can live with a stale preview.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No quantised build from OpenGVLab, so about 51 GB at BF16
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a fast sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 60
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 45
- Documentation and upkeep, 67 against 28
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview | Recursive Flint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 75 | Recursive Flint +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Recursive Flint +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 45 | 90 | Recursive Flint +45 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 28 | 67 | Recursive Flint +39 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 51.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview | Recursive Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenGVLab (Shanghai AI Laboratory) | Recursive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0; a merge of openai/gpt-oss-20b (Apache 2.0 with OpenAI's usage policy) and OpenGVLab/InternViT-300M-448px-V2_5 (MIT) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-09-08 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
An image and video reader on gpt-oss-20b with an optional thinking mode, a preview untouched for over a year. It needs about 51 GB in BF16, since OpenGVLab publishes no quantised build, and runs in Transformers and vLLM. The main risk is a chat template in the Transformers-format repository that doesn't match its tokenizer, with no safety results.
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. It needs llama.cpp b11803 or Ollama 0.40.8 or later, and the BF16 checkpoint needs a 141 GB GPU. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
Before you call either
InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Serve with
vllm serve OpenGVLab/InternVL3_5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview-HF --max-model-len 32768, which is our command; the card gives none for vLLM - Check the rendered prompt before relying on it, since the shipped template's <|im_start|> markers aren't tokens in the gpt-oss tokenizer; the GitHub-format repository's harmony template is the alternative
- Use Transformers 4.55.0 or later, as the card requires for this size
- For thinking, send the card's thinking system prompt and parse the reasoning out of the <think> tags, with temperature 0.6 and sampling on as the card advises
- Keep inputs within 32K tokens, the length it was trained at, whatever the config says
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview or Recursive Flint?
Recursive Flint scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview's 51.2 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview or Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kolibri-1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna M.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna XS 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs occamy-1.0
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview-vs-recursive-flint.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview.json·/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json - From a terminal
anchor compare internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview recursive-flint(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "internvl3-5-gpt-oss-20b-a4b-preview", "b": "recursive-flint"}at/mcp, no key