Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Recursive Flint vs ZAYA1-8B
Recursive Flint and ZAYA1-8B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 80
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 67 against 50
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
ZAYA1-8B C
Best for People who want a small, fast reasoning model for maths and code and can live without tool calling
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Tool calling needs a parser that only Zyphra's vLLM fork has
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Recursive Flint +30
Recursive Flint 90
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository and inside both GGUFs. Tool-calling format 25, Recursive's serving README documents how tools go in, how calls come back and the flint parser. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn. Structured output 15, response_format with JSON Schema is documented. Reasoning control 0, the model decides when to reason and Recursive says there's no switch or budget. Context 10, 262,144 tokens with no position scaling.
ZAYA1-8B 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (10,700 characters). Tool-calling format 10, only the template and a fork say it. Trained tool calling 10, the template takes tools and renders calls, and the card recommends settings for agent use, but it doesn't say the model was trained for tool calling or for several calls in a turn, so the lower band. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, the template has an enable_thinking switch, and the card names the qwen3 reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 positions in config.json, for an architecture Zyphra trained end to end, so the config is the model's own. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 60.
Documentation and upkeep Recursive Flint +17
Recursive Flint 67
Model card 17 of 20, everything but languages. Training data 10, a general description of the mix with a June 2026 cut-off. Last change 20, released 13 days ago. Responsiveness 5, Recursive answered one of 31 discussions, on release day. Version policy 5, a first release. File health 10, the files agree with each other and the card, and no broken-file report waits.
ZAYA1-8B 50
Model card 5, Intended use and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 26 June 2026 (the checkpoint reshaped for Transformers), 137 days before this check, and the quantised repositories on 2 July, 131 days. Responsiveness 20, Of the 16 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (7 May to 14 August 2026), 10 have a reply from a Zyphra member, which is most. Version policy 5, the original checkpoint is kept as ZAYA1-8B-legacy and the card says so at the top, without a date. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture after the reshape. 5 + 0 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 50.
Reach Recursive Flint +5
Recursive Flint 85
Memory 20 of 30, Recursive's MLX INT4 build is 22.6 GB, or 27.1 GB with a fifth added, which fits 32 GB, and every other 4-bit build lands in the same band. Runtimes 25 of 25, released llama.cpp (b11803), Ollama 0.40.8, LM Studio's catalogue, Transformers v5.21 and vLLM v0.33.0 run it, while SGLang has only a development image. Builds 15, MLX INT4 plus Q4_1 and NVFP4 GGUFs from Recursive. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, OpenRouter lists a free endpoint with Recursive as its provider, but it wasn't serving on 3 November 2026, with 0 per cent uptime over the last day.
ZAYA1-8B 80
Memory 30, the smallest build from Zyphra is the MXFP4-Experts repository, 5.85 GB, and 5.85 GB × 1.2 = 7.0 GB, within 16 GB. Runtimes 10, Released Transformers 5.22.2 has the zaya model and SGLang 0.5.23 has srt/models/zaya.py. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Zyphra at two precisions, FP8 and MXFP4 for the experts, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its builds on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API. Zyphra's site lists a cloud product for its open models, which wasn't checked for this model. 30 + 10 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 80.
Risk Recursive Flint +5
Recursive Flint 60
File safety 15 of 25, safetensors and GGUF only, but the card's documented BF16 route installs the wheel shipped in the repository. Provenance 15, the files are in the RecursiveSI organisation that Recursive's own engine downloads from, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, none on the cards or in the announcement post. Agent guidance 10, the card and serving README say to enforce permissions around tool use and to strip tool tags from untrusted tool output, but there's no trained instruction hierarchy. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 5, a reporting address on the card and a private reporting route for the engine, with no public advisories yet.
ZAYA1-8B 55
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the Zyphra organisation, which the card ties to zyphra.com's blog post for the model (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on prompt injection, instruction priority or what the model refuses. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card, and www.zyphra.com has no security.txt. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Recursive Flint | ZAYA1-8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 80 | Recursive Flint +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | Recursive Flint +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 60 | Recursive Flint +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 67 | 50 | Recursive Flint +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Recursive Flint | ZAYA1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Recursive | Zyphra |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-21 | 2026-07-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
ZAYA1-8B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. Released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM and Transformers run it, while Recursive's free OpenRouter endpoint wasn't serving on 3 November 2026. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
ZAYA1-8B
A small reasoning model trained from scratch by one lab, with a clean licence, 4-bit and FP8 builds and a team that answers questions. It's the hardest of the small models to run: its own architecture, a card that points at forks, and tool calling that needs a parser no release has. Little on limits, data or safety.
Before you call either
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
- Check OpenRouter's endpoints list before calling recursive/flint-v1.0:free, since its only endpoint (Recursive, BF16) showed 0 per cent uptime over the last day on 3 November 2026
- vLLM needs v0.33.0 or later and Transformers v5.21 or later; released SGLang has no Flint model
ZAYA1-8B
- Use it for reasoning, maths and code. Don't count on tool calling outside Zyphra's vLLM fork
- Run it with Transformers 5.22.2 or SGLang 0.5.23, which have the model built in
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 in general, and temperature 0.6 for agent and code work
- Download
Zyphra/ZAYA1-8B, not the legacy repository, for the released runtimes - The quantised repositories have no licence tag. The main one is Apache 2.0
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Recursive Flint or ZAYA1-8B?
Recursive Flint and ZAYA1-8B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C).
Other comparisons with Recursive Flint or ZAYA1-8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ZAYA1-8B
- Arete-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Arete-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cola2 vs Recursive Flint
- Cola2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Recursive Flint
- Devstral Small 2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Recursive Flint
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs ZAYA1-8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs ZAYA1-8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Kronos vs Recursive Flint
- Kronos vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LBS-27B vs Recursive Flint
- LBS-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-1.7B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Recursive Flint
- Mistral Large 4 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Recursive Flint
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ZAYA1-8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Recursive Flint
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Recursive Flint vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Recursive Flint vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Recursive Flint vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Recursive Flint vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Recursive Flint vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
- SmolLM3-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- WeVisOne-VL-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/recursive-flint-vs-zaya1-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json·/api/v1/tools/zaya1-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare recursive-flint zaya1-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "recursive-flint", "b": "zaya1-8b"}at/mcp, no key