Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3023 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Hobbyist and research agents that want a faster-finishing Qwen3.8-27B for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
Watch for
Published from a personal account, with no organisation, security contact or safety evaluation
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a fast sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 67 against 56
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 | Recursive Flint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 75 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 60 | Recursive Flint +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 90 | Recursive Flint +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 67 | Recursive Flint +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 | Recursive Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Jackrong | Recursive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
A Qwen3.8-27B cousin tuned to think less per turn in long agent loops, with an MTP head for speculative decoding in llama.cpp. It fits 24 GB with Jackrong's 4-bit GGUF. The risks are one person's experimental release with no safety work, training traces taken from Claude and GPT, and a tool format that differs from Qwen's.
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. It needs llama.cpp b11803 or Ollama 0.40.8 or later, and the BF16 checkpoint needs a 141 GB GPU. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
Before you call either
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf Jackrong/Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17 GB, and add mmproj-F32.gguf for images - The card's tests used Q5_K_M with the bundled MTP head and
--spec-type draft-mtpin llama.cpp - The template asks for tool calls as JSON inside tool_call tags, so use a Hermes-style parser (vLLM's hermes), not Qwen3.8's qwen3_coder
- For coding the card recommends enable_thinking true, reasoning_effort xhigh and temperature 0.3, which you must pass yourself, since generation_config.json says 1.0
- reasoning_effort takes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error
- Earlier reasoning stays in the context unless preserve_thinking is false
- Cap max_tokens, since a report says it loops more than V1
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 or Recursive Flint?
Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 and Recursive Flint score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Recursive Flint leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 or Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2-vs-recursive-flint.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.json·/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json - From a terminal
anchor compare qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2 recursive-flint(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2", "b": "recursive-flint"}at/mcp, no key