Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-20b vs Recursive Flint
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against Recursive Flint's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Recursive Flint leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3023 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents on a 24 GB GPU or Mac that want a permissive licence, wide runtime support and documented structured output, one tool call at a time
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Risk, 85 against 60
Watch for
No reply from OpenAI to any discussion since August 2025, and template reports wait unanswered
Best for Agents doing repository work on a 32 to 48 GB Mac or NVIDIA box that want a fast sparse coder with documented tool calls and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 67 against 42
Watch for
No independent benchmark results yet, every published score is Recursive's
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-20b | Recursive Flint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 75 | gpt-oss-20b +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 85 | 60 | gpt-oss-20b +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 42 | 67 | Recursive Flint +25 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 69.9/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-20b | Recursive Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | Recursive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-20b
gpt-oss-20b is a cousin for reasoning, coding and single tool calls with structured output, under plain Apache 2.0. It needs about 17 GB with a working context, and five inference providers serve it. The main risks are that it trails o4-mini at keeping system instructions above user ones, and OpenAI hasn't answered a report since August 2025.
Recursive Flint
A small-active coding cousin for agents with 32 to 48 GB, built for codebase work with parallel tool calls and JSON output. It needs llama.cpp b11803 or Ollama 0.40.8 or later, and the BF16 checkpoint needs a 141 GB GPU. Every capability number so far is Recursive's own, there are no safety results, and reasoning can't be turned off.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-20b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:20b(the build that fits the reference machine), orvllm serve openai/gpt-oss-20bwith a current vLLM release rather than the card's pinned vllm==0.10.1+gptoss wheel - Use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony; OpenAI says the model doesn't work correctly without it
- Parse tool calls and reasoning with openai-harmony; calls come on the commentary channel ending in
<|call|>, reasoning on the analysis channel - Set effort with
Reasoning: high(or low, medium) in the system message, orreasoning_effortin the template; medium is the default - Ask for JSON by putting a JSON Schema under
# Response Formatsin the developer message - Drop earlier reasoning after a final answer but pass it back after tool calls, and don't show the analysis channel to users
- Expect one tool call per turn; run several in sequence rather than in parallel
Recursive Flint
- Quickest start is
ollama run flint(Ollama 0.40.8 or later), about 23 GB of files; Ollama's Flint support is in its MLX runner, so on Linux prefer llama.cpp - With llama.cpp use release b11803 or later:
llama-server -hf RecursiveSI/flint-int4-gguf --alias flint -ngl all -c 131072 -np 1 -fa on --jinja --temp 1 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, and keep --jinja on - Set max_tokens to at least 32768 for hard tasks, reasoning counts against it and can't be switched off, and finish_reason length can mean no answer or tool call came out
- Send reasoning_content back on assistant messages when replaying the conversation, as Recursive's cards ask
- Strip <tool_call>, <tool_response>, <arg_key> and <arg_value> from untrusted tool output, the template doesn't escape them and a copied </tool_call> can add a call
- Message content must be a string, flatten content-part arrays first
- Recursive's SGLang servers listen on 0.0.0.0 with no key, publish the port on localhost only or pass --api-key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-20b or Recursive Flint?
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against Recursive Flint's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Recursive Flint leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-20b or Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Recursive Flint
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Recursive Flint
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-20b
- BigBang-v1 vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-20b
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-20b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Recursive Flint
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs Recursive Flint
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling vs Recursive Flint
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3 vs Recursive Flint
- Kolibri-1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Recursive Flint
- occamy-1.0 vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Recursive Flint
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Recursive Flint
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-20b-vs-recursive-flint.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-20b.json·/api/v1/tools/recursive-flint.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-20b recursive-flint(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-20b", "b": "recursive-flint"}at/mcp, no key