Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2

Qwen3.5-4B and Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.2 (C) and 61 (C). Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Qwen3.5-4B C

Best for Agents that want a cheap local helper for tool calls, short reasoning and reading images on a laptop or small GPU

Ahead on

  • Risk, 55 against 50
  • Agent interface, 70 against 60

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5

Watch for

No quantised build from Alibaba for this size

Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 C

Best for Hobbyist and research agents that want a faster-finishing Qwen3.8-27B for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU.

Ahead on

  • Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 34

Watch for

Published from a personal account, with no organisation, security contact or safety evaluation

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runQwen3.5-4BQwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2Edge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%258585even
Risk20%205550Qwen3.5-4B +5
Agent interface10%107060Qwen3.5-4B +10
Documentation and upkeep10%103456Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 +22
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 61.2/100C 61/100

Facts side by side

FactQwen3.5-4BQwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorAlibaba (Qwen team)Jackrong
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-03-022026-09-21
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3/5 (4)2.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Qwen3.5-4B

A small vision-language cousin for tool calls, light agent steps and image or video reading on almost any machine, with switchable thinking. Ollama's 3.3 GB build or the 9.3 GB BF16 files run in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. The main risks are no safety results, no structured-output guarantee and no answers from Alibaba since March.

Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2

A Qwen3.8-27B cousin tuned to think less per turn in long agent loops, with an MTP head for speculative decoding in llama.cpp. It fits 24 GB with Jackrong's 4-bit GGUF. The risks are one person's experimental release with no safety work, training traces taken from Claude and GPT, and a tool format that differs from Qwen's.

Before you call either

Qwen3.5-4B

  1. Smallest start is ollama run qwen3.5:4b (Q4_K_M, about 4 GB with context)
  2. Full precision vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder
  3. Turn thinking off with "chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false} in the request body, since it's on by default and /think and /nothink aren't supported
  4. There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example temperature=0.7, top_p=0.8, top_k=20, presence_penalty=1.5 without thinking
  5. Keep the context at 128K or more if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only past 262,144 tokens
  6. Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented

Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2

  1. Quickest start is llama-server -hf Jackrong/Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17 GB, and add mmproj-F32.gguf for images
  2. The card's tests used Q5_K_M with the bundled MTP head and --spec-type draft-mtp in llama.cpp
  3. The template asks for tool calls as JSON inside tool_call tags, so use a Hermes-style parser (vLLM's hermes), not Qwen3.8's qwen3_coder
  4. For coding the card recommends enable_thinking true, reasoning_effort xhigh and temperature 0.3, which you must pass yourself, since generation_config.json says 1.0
  5. reasoning_effort takes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error
  6. Earlier reasoning stays in the context unless preserve_thinking is false
  7. Cap max_tokens, since a report says it loops more than V1

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Qwen3.5-4B or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2?

Qwen3.5-4B and Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.2 (C) and 61 (C). Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on documentation and upkeep.

Other comparisons with Qwen3.5-4B or Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.