Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith-1.5-397B scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 65
- Risk, 75 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 52 against 36
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 35
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Olmo 3 7B Think | Ornith-1.5-397B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 65 | Olmo 3 7B Think +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 50 | Olmo 3 7B Think +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 35 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-397B +50 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 52 | 36 | Olmo 3 7B Think +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 52.3/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Olmo 3 7B Think | Ornith-1.5-397B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-06-25 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning cousin for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's flagship coding and terminal-agent cousin, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results and files replaced without a note.
Before you call either
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Olmo 3 7B Think or Ornith-1.5-397B?
Ornith-1.5-397B scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Olmo 3 7B Think or Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/olmo-3-7b-think-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare olmo-3-7b-think ornith-1-5-397b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "olmo-3-7b-think", "b": "ornith-1-5-397b"}at/mcp, no key