Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Best for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 50
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ornith-1.5-397B | Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 90 | Qwen3.8-27B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3.8-27B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Ornith-1.5-397B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 36 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59/100 | B 68.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ornith-1.5-397B | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ornith | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-23 | 2026-08-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's flagship coding and terminal-agent cousin, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results and files replaced without a note.
Qwen3.8-27B
A dense cousin for coding and agent work with image and video input that runs almost anywhere. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and five providers host it for agents without the hardware. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba answers, there are no safety results or agent guidance, and the tool format is only in the template.
Before you call either
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3.8, about 18 GB of files - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, since FP8 on gfx1151 isn't documented - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, SGLang's cookbook says the Hermes parser leaves its calls unparsed
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Preserved thinking keeps earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens, the card warns static YaRN can cost quality on short texts
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ornith-1.5-397B or Qwen3.8-27B?
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Ornith-1.5-397B or Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ornith-1-5-397b-vs-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ornith-1-5-397b qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ornith-1-5-397b", "b": "qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key