Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against WeVisOne-VL-2B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. WeVisOne-VL-2B leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 70
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Best for Agents that need to locate, count or cut out objects in images on a small GPU, under a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 36
Watch for
The pixel decoder ships as a pickle file
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Qwen3.8-27B +20
Qwen3.8-27B 90
Memory 25 of 30, Ollama's smallest 4-bit build is 18 GB, or 21.6 GB with a fifth added, which fits 24 GB. Runtimes 25, released versions of llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run the qwen3_5 architecture. Builds 10 of 15, Alibaba's only quantised build is FP8. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, neither repository is gated. Hosted 5, seven inference providers are live for it on Hugging Face on 1 November, though Qwen Cloud's own version is still described as coming soon.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 70
Memory 30, the only build from Tencent is the BF16 safetensors file with its decoder, 4.92 GB, and 4.92 GB × 1.2 = 5.9 GB, within 16 GB. No runtime library has a build. Runtimes 15, the architecture is Qwen3VLForConditionalGeneration, which vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 run from the safetensors file, three at 5 each. Builds 0, Tencent publishes the BF16 weights only. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata with the LICENSE file in the repository, and nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 30 + 15 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 70.
Documentation and upkeep WeVisOne-VL-2B +12
Qwen3.8-27B 36
Model card 11 of 20, intended use, architecture, parameters and context are there, but limitations, languages and a knowledge cut-off aren't. Training data 0, not described. Last change 15, the files last changed on 14 August 2026, 79 days before this check, and Qwen's GitHub repository for the model holds only a README and licence, so no reference code of Alibaba's changed later. Responsiveness 0, Qwen answered none of the 40 most recent questions and reports, recounted on 1 November. Version policy 5, earlier 27B models stay in their own repositories without dated notes. File health 5, the files agree with the card but reports about the template and structured output wait without a reply.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 48
Model card 8, Intended use, limitations and the architecture are on the card. Training data 5, A general description in the README of a data engine and over 100 million annotated images, with no sources named and no cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 28 October 2026, put the weights back in BF16, 13 days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the one discussion that isn't a pull request (23 October 2026) has no reply from a tencent member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, A first release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the Qwen3-VL classes, and the card names mask_decoder.pt as required and it's there. 8 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 48.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Qwen3.8-27B | WeVisOne-VL-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 70 | Qwen3.8-27B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 48 | WeVisOne-VL-2B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 68.6/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Qwen3.8-27B | WeVisOne-VL-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Alibaba (Qwen team) | Tencent (WeChat Vision) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-14 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
WeVisOne-VL-2B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Qwen3.8-27B
A dense cousin for coding and agent work with image and video input that runs almost anywhere. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and seven providers host it for agents without the hardware. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba answers, there are no safety results or agent guidance, and the tool format is only in the template.
WeVisOne-VL-2B
A small Apache 2.0 perception model that finds, counts, reads and cuts out what you name in an image, and says None when it isn't there. Boxes and points run in vLLM, SGLang or Transformers. Masks and mattes need Tencent's package and a pickle file. Two weeks old, with no questions answered yet and no safety results.
Before you call either
Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3.8, about 18 GB of files - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, since FP8 on gfx1151 isn't documented - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, SGLang's cookbook says the Hermes parser leaves its calls unparsed
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Preserved thinking keeps earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens, the card warns static YaRN can cost quality on short texts
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Use Tencent's package:
WeVisOneVL("tencent/WeVisOne-VL-2B", backend="vllm")thenmodel.predict(image, task=..., query=...) - Tasks are detection, referring, point, count_box, count_point, ocr, ocr_grounding, segmentation and matting
- A None answer means the target isn't in the image. Treat it as a result, not an error
- mask_decoder.pt is a pickle. Load it only from the tencent repository, and check its SHA-256 against the Hub's
- Send one image a turn. Video grids are rejected by the decoder
- The card says it isn't for identifying individuals or for high-impact decisions on its own
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Qwen3.8-27B or WeVisOne-VL-2B?
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against WeVisOne-VL-2B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. WeVisOne-VL-2B leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Qwen3.8-27B or WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Arete-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Carbon-X vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cola2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Devstral Small 2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.8-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Recursive Flint vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/qwen3-8-27b-vs-wevisone-vl-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-27b.json·/api/v1/tools/wevisone-vl-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare qwen3-8-27b wevisone-vl-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "qwen3-8-27b", "b": "wevisone-vl-2b"}at/mcp, no key