Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
GLM-4.7-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against WeVisOne-VL-2B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. WeVisOne-VL-2B leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents and developers who want a small, permissively licensed tool-calling model on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, in almost any runtime
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 70
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No change to the files since 29 January 2026 and no zai-org reply on discussions since 31 January
Best for Agents that need to locate, count or cut out objects in images on a small GPU, under a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 28
Watch for
The pixel decoder ships as a pickle file
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep WeVisOne-VL-2B +20
GLM-4.7-Flash 28
The card covers architecture, parameters and languages and misses four of the seven items, for 8. Training data is 0, as the card describes none. The last change was on 1 February 2026 at the latest, within a year but past 180 days, for 5. Responsiveness is 5, since zai-org answered 6 of the 40 most recent discussions, all by 31 January, which is a few. Version policy is 5 for a first release with no files replaced, and file health is 5, as config.json and tokenizer_config.json disagree on context and a config report waits without a reply.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 48
Model card 8, Intended use, limitations and the architecture are on the card. Training data 5, A general description in the README of a data engine and over 100 million annotated images, with no sources named and no cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 28 October 2026, put the weights back in BF16, 13 days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the one discussion that isn't a pull request (23 October 2026) has no reply from a tencent member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, A first release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the Qwen3-VL classes, and the card names mask_decoder.pt as required and it's there. 8 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 48.
Agent interface GLM-4.7-Flash +15
GLM-4.7-Flash 85
A Jinja chat template sits in the repository, for 20. The tool-calling format is the full 25, because Z.ai itself names the glm47 parser for vLLM and SGLang, says tools are declared in OpenAI style and shows calls coming back as tool_calls. The template takes several calls in one turn, for 20. Structured output is 0, with nothing on the card and only the hosted API documented for JSON. Reasoning control is 10, thinking turned off per request with enable_thinking and the reasoning returned by the glm45 parser. Context is 10, 202,752 positions native with no rope scaling.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,292 characters), Qwen3-VL's template. Tool-calling format 25, Read for a perception model as what it takes and returns. Trained tool calling 10, Read for a perception model as the inputs it was trained to use. Structured output 15, Read for a perception model as typed outputs. Reasoning control 0, the card says it writes structured output directly with no chain-of-thought reasoning. Context 0, Tencent states no context length for it. 20 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 0 + 0 = 70.
Reach GLM-4.7-Flash +10
GLM-4.7-Flash 80
Memory earns 25, since Ollama's smallest build is the 19 GB q4_K_M one, about 22.8 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB. Runtimes reach the cap of 25, with model code in released vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, a converter in a released llama.cpp build and a local entry in Ollama's library. Builds earn nothing, because Z.ai publishes only BF16 and every quantised build is someone else's. The MIT licence with nothing added gives the full 15 for terms, the files download with no account or gate for 10, and Z.ai plus three other providers serve it for 5.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 70
Memory 30, the only build from Tencent is the BF16 safetensors file with its decoder, 4.92 GB, and 4.92 GB × 1.2 = 5.9 GB, within 16 GB. No runtime library has a build. Runtimes 15, the architecture is Qwen3VLForConditionalGeneration, which vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 run from the safetensors file, three at 5 each. Builds 0, Tencent publishes the BF16 weights only. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata with the LICENSE file in the repository, and nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 30 + 15 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 70.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GLM-4.7-Flash | WeVisOne-VL-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 70 | GLM-4.7-Flash +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | GLM-4.7-Flash +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 28 | 48 | WeVisOne-VL-2B +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GLM-4.7-Flash | WeVisOne-VL-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Tencent (WeChat Vision) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-01-29 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
GLM-4.7-Flash
A small MIT-licensed mixture-of-experts model with about 3B active parameters, for local agent and coding work with several tool calls per turn and optional thinking. It runs in Ollama at about 23 GB and in nearly every common runtime. The main risk is neglect, with no changes or replies since early February and no safety results.
WeVisOne-VL-2B
A small Apache 2.0 perception model that finds, counts, reads and cuts out what you name in an image, and says None when it isn't there. Boxes and points run in vLLM, SGLang or Transformers. Masks and mattes need Tencent's package and a pickle file. Two weeks old, with no questions answered yet and no safety results.
Before you call either
GLM-4.7-Flash
- On our reference machine start it with
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash --max-model-len 65536 --tool-call-parser glm47 --reasoning-parser glm45 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name glm-4.7-flash - Or run
ollama run glm-4.7-flashfor the 19 GB q4_K_M build - Without the glm47 and glm45 parsers, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Use a released vLLM (0.32.0 or later) or SGLang (0.5.22 or later); the card's nightly and pull-request builds date from January 2026
- Pass
chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false}for short tasks, since thinking is on by default - Set
clear_thinking: falseto keep earlier reasoning in multi-turn agent work, as Z.ai does for τ²-Bench and Terminal Bench - Set the context length yourself, since config.json allows 202,752 tokens and tokenizer_config.json says 128,000
WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Use Tencent's package:
WeVisOneVL("tencent/WeVisOne-VL-2B", backend="vllm")thenmodel.predict(image, task=..., query=...) - Tasks are detection, referring, point, count_box, count_point, ocr, ocr_grounding, segmentation and matting
- A None answer means the target isn't in the image. Treat it as a result, not an error
- mask_decoder.pt is a pickle. Load it only from the tencent repository, and check its SHA-256 against the Hub's
- Send one image a turn. Video grids are rejected by the decoder
- The card says it isn't for identifying individuals or for high-impact decisions on its own
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GLM-4.7-Flash or WeVisOne-VL-2B?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against WeVisOne-VL-2B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. WeVisOne-VL-2B leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with GLM-4.7-Flash or WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Arete-27B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Arete-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Carbon-X vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Carbon-X vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Cola2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cola2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kolibri-1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kronos
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs North Mini Code 1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ZAYA1-8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Hy3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling-Small vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kronos vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LBS-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Mistral Large 4 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Recursive Flint vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-wevisone-vl-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/glm-4-7-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/wevisone-vl-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare glm-4-7-flash wevisone-vl-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "glm-4-7-flash", "b": "wevisone-vl-2b"}at/mcp, no key