Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Granite 4.2 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
Granite 4.2 30B and WeVisOne-VL-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 70
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 48
Watch for
No safety results published for it
Best for Agents that need to locate, count or cut out objects in images on a small GPU, under a permissive licence
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The pixel decoder ships as a pickle file
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Granite 4.2 30B +39
Granite 4.2 30B 87
Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 12 tested languages are on the card. Training data 20, IBM's disclosure file for the 30B lists the datasets used in pre-training and post-training as machine-readable metadata, and the card describes the three training stages. Last change 15, the last commit to the repository was on 4 September 2026, 67 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 4 discussions that aren't pull requests (28 August to 3 November 2026), 3 have a reply from an ibm-granite member. Version policy 5, Granite 4.1 30B stays in its own repository and 4.2 came out in new ones. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture, the 131,072-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 20 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 87.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 48
Model card 8, Intended use, limitations and the architecture are on the card. Training data 5, A general description in the README of a data engine and over 100 million annotated images, with no sources named and no cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 28 October 2026, put the weights back in BF16, 13 days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the one discussion that isn't a pull request (23 October 2026) has no reply from a tencent member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, A first release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the Qwen3-VL classes, and the card names mask_decoder.pt as required and it's there. 8 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 48.
Reach Granite 4.2 30B +20
Granite 4.2 30B 90
Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB. Its Q4_0 GGUF is 16.58 GB and Ollama's library build granite4.2:30b 18 GB, the same band. Runtimes 25, Released versions run the granite architecture in llama.cpp (granite, b12242), vLLM (GraniteForCausalLM in the v0.33.0 registry), SGLang (granite.py at v0.5.23), Transformers (v5.22.2) and Ollama (its own granite4.2 library entry, 30b tag). Builds 15, IBM publishes FP8, MXFP4 and NVFP4 safetensors builds, a GGUF repository with Q4_0 to Q8_0 and BF16 files, and 4-bit, 8-bit and BF16 MLX builds, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI-approved licence, with no use policy or other terms added on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the BF16, FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX repositories, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps one inference provider (DeepInfra, live), short of the two the line needs. 25 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 90.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 70
Memory 30, the only build from Tencent is the BF16 safetensors file with its decoder, 4.92 GB, and 4.92 GB × 1.2 = 5.9 GB, within 16 GB. No runtime library has a build. Runtimes 15, the architecture is Qwen3VLForConditionalGeneration, which vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 run from the safetensors file, three at 5 each. Builds 0, Tencent publishes the BF16 weights only. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata with the LICENSE file in the repository, and nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 30 + 15 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 70.
Agent interface Granite 4.2 30B +15
Granite 4.2 30B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort. Tool-calling format 25, the card has tool-calling sections for vLLM and SGLang, declares tools with OpenAI's function schema and names the parser to use, qwen3_coder, which both runtimes ship in the released versions read. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so it renders several calls in one turn, and the card names tool calling and agentic workflows as what it's best for. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output or how to ask for it. Reasoning control 10, the card documents thinking on by default, non-thinking and low-effort modes per request through the template (enable_thinking and low_effort), with the reasoning returned apart from the answer. Context 10, 131,072 tokens natively per the card and config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
WeVisOne-VL-2B 70
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,292 characters), Qwen3-VL's template. Tool-calling format 25, Read for a perception model as what it takes and returns. Trained tool calling 10, Read for a perception model as the inputs it was trained to use. Structured output 15, Read for a perception model as typed outputs. Reasoning control 0, the card says it writes structured output directly with no chain-of-thought reasoning. Context 0, Tencent states no context length for it. 20 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 0 + 0 = 70.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Granite 4.2 30B | WeVisOne-VL-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 70 | Granite 4.2 30B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Granite 4.2 30B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 87 | 48 | Granite 4.2 30B +39 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Granite 4.2 30B | WeVisOne-VL-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | IBM | Tencent (WeChat Vision) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
Verdicts
Granite 4.2 30B
IBM's largest reasoning cousin, with the same strengths as the 3B. It runs in every runtime we count from IBM's own builds on a 24 GB card, is signed, plain Apache 2.0, and comes with a disclosure of its training data. No safety results are published and structured output isn't documented.
WeVisOne-VL-2B
A small Apache 2.0 perception model that finds, counts, reads and cuts out what you name in an image, and says None when it isn't there. Boxes and points run in vLLM, SGLang or Transformers. Masks and mattes need Tencent's package and a pickle file. Two weeks old, with no questions answered yet and no safety results.
Before you call either
Granite 4.2 30B
- Start it with
ollama run granite4.2:30b, orllama-server -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja - With vLLM 0.32.0 or later leave out
--reasoning-parser-plugin, since the parser is built in, and use--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinkingfalse to turn it off orlow_efforttrue for short reasoning - The context is 131,072 tokens. The card's 512K extension isn't documented
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- IBM recommends Granite Guardian beside it to flag risky inputs and outputs
WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Use Tencent's package:
WeVisOneVL("tencent/WeVisOne-VL-2B", backend="vllm")thenmodel.predict(image, task=..., query=...) - Tasks are detection, referring, point, count_box, count_point, ocr, ocr_grounding, segmentation and matting
- A None answer means the target isn't in the image. Treat it as a result, not an error
- mask_decoder.pt is a pickle. Load it only from the tencent repository, and check its SHA-256 against the Hub's
- Send one image a turn. Video grids are rejected by the decoder
- The card says it isn't for identifying individuals or for high-impact decisions on its own
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Granite 4.2 30B or WeVisOne-VL-2B?
Granite 4.2 30B and WeVisOne-VL-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C).
Other comparisons with Granite 4.2 30B or WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Arete-27B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Arete-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Carbon-X vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Cola2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Cola2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Devstral Small 2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 30B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kolibri-1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kronos
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Mistral Large 4
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Recursive Flint
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Hy3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling-Small vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Kronos vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LBS-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Mistral Large 4 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Recursive Flint vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Step 3.7 Flash vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- WeVisOne-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-wevisone-vl-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/granite-4-2-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/wevisone-vl-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare granite-4-2-30b wevisone-vl-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "granite-4-2-30b", "b": "wevisone-vl-2b"}at/mcp, no key