Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Nanbeige4.2-3B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents that need tool calling and a long context on a laptop or a small GPU
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 72 against 36
Watch for
Its own architecture: Transformers loads it only with the repository's code
Best for Agents that want a capable open model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with the widest runtime support and a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Nanbeige4.2-3B +36
Nanbeige4.2-3B 72
Model card 17, Intended use, limitations, the architecture, the parameters (3B outside the embeddings), the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of how the fine-tuning and reinforcement learning data was built and filtered, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 15, the last commit, on 11 September 2026, updated modeling_nanbeige.py, 60 days before this check and within 90. Responsiveness 20, Of the 34 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (21 July to 10 September 2026), 20 have a reply from a Nanbeige member, which is most. Version policy 5, Nanbeige's earlier models (Nanbeige4-3B, 4.1-3B) stay in their own repositories, as the Base, FP8, 8-bit and DSpark builds of this one do. File health 10, Config, tokenizer config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 262,144 tokens. 17 + 5 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 72.
Qwen3.8-27B 36
Model card 11 of 20, intended use, architecture, parameters and context are there, but limitations, languages and a knowledge cut-off aren't. Training data 0, not described. Last change 15, the files last changed on 14 August 2026, 79 days before this check, and Qwen's GitHub repository for the model holds only a README and licence, so no reference code of Alibaba's changed later. Responsiveness 0, Qwen answered none of the 40 most recent questions and reports, recounted on 1 November. Version policy 5, earlier 27B models stay in their own repositories without dated notes. File health 5, the files agree with the card but reports about the template and structured output wait without a reply.
Agent interface Nanbeige4.2-3B +15
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Chat template 20, A Jinja chat template in tokenizer_config.json (7,961 characters), with enable_thinking, preserve_thinking, tools and tool_call_format switches. Tool-calling format 25, the card says passing tools switches on the tool template and recommends tool_call_format xml, with json for compatibility, and its SGLang and vLLM commands name the nanbeige tool-call parser, which released SGLang 0.5.23 has. Trained tool calling 20, the card describes fine-tuning on tool-use environments and agent scaffolds and reinforcement learning on agent tasks, and the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Neither the card nor the files mention JSON or JSON Schema output, beyond json as a tool-call format. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking, on by default and False per request, and preserve_thinking for earlier turns, and names the nanbeige reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, which the card says the model supports and config.json gives as max_position_embeddings. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Qwen3.8-27B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format lives only in the template and the parser name only in serving commands, Alibaba doesn't describe how tools are declared or returned. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request, reasoning_effort budgets it and the card shows the reasoning coming back in reasoning_content. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Reach Qwen3.8-27B +5
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Memory 30, the smallest build from Nanbeige is the FP8 repository (the 8-bit GPTQ one is the same size), 5.19 GB, and 5.19 GB × 1.2 = 6.2 GB, within 16 GB. bartowski's GGUF isn't read for this line. Runtimes 15, Released SGLang 0.5.23 has the model (srt/models/nanbeige.py) with its parsers, llama.cpp b12242 has the nanbeige architecture, and vLLM 0.33.0 names NanbeigeForCausalLM in its registry, served through its Transformers backend. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Nanbeige at two precisions, FP8 and 8-bit GPTQ, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence, with no use policy or other terms on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its FP8 and 8-bit repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and no Nanbeige or BOSS Zhipin API for it was found. 30 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 85.
Qwen3.8-27B 90
Memory 25 of 30, Ollama's smallest 4-bit build is 18 GB, or 21.6 GB with a fifth added, which fits 24 GB. Runtimes 25, released versions of llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run the qwen3_5 architecture. Builds 10 of 15, Alibaba's only quantised build is FP8. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, neither repository is gated. Hosted 5, seven inference providers are live for it on Hugging Face on 1 November, though Qwen Cloud's own version is still described as coming soon.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nanbeige4.2-3B | Qwen3.8-27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 90 | Qwen3.8-27B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 72 | 36 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +36 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 68.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nanbeige4.2-3B | Qwen3.8-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-08-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Nanbeige4.2-3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Nanbeige4.2-3B
A small model built for agent work, with tool calling it was trained for, a thinking switch and a 256K context in about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, from a lab that answers most questions. Its architecture is its own, so check your runtime: SGLang and llama.cpp have it, Transformers needs the repository's code, and Nanbeige ships no GGUF.
Qwen3.8-27B
A dense cousin for coding and agent work with image and video input that runs almost anywhere. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and seven providers host it for agents without the hardware. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba answers, there are no safety results or agent guidance, and the tool format is only in the template.
Before you call either
Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later and pass
--tool-call-parser nanbeige --reasoning-parser nanbeige - Pass
toolsin the request. The card recommendstool_call_format="xml" - Set
preserve_thinkingtrue for multi-turn tool use and coding, false for plain chat - Use temperature 1.0 for agent and tool work and 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- For llama.cpp use b12242 or later. The GGUF files on the Hub are bartowski's, not Nanbeige's
- If you load it with Transformers, read modeling_nanbeige.py first: trust_remote_code runs it
Qwen3.8-27B
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3.8, about 18 GB of files - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, since FP8 on gfx1151 isn't documented - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, SGLang's cookbook says the Hermes parser leaves its calls unparsed
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Preserved thinking keeps earlier reasoning in the context unless
preserve_thinkingis false, which grows long agent sessions - Turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens, the card warns static YaRN can cost quality on short texts
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nanbeige4.2-3B or Qwen3.8-27B?
Qwen3.8-27B scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against Nanbeige4.2-3B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Nanbeige4.2-3B or Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Arete-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nanbeige-4-2-3b-vs-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-2-3b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nanbeige-4-2-3b qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nanbeige-4-2-3b", "b": "qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key