Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B and Nanbeige4.2-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small coding and terminal-agent model to fine-tune further on a 24 GB GPU, or to run at 4-bit through Ollama in about 8 GB.
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
Watch for
Only BF16 from Xiaomi, about 23 GB to run; the smaller builds are Ollama's
Best for Local agents that need tool calling and a long context on a laptop or a small GPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 80
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 72 against 40
Watch for
Its own architecture: Transformers loads it only with the repository's code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Nanbeige4.2-3B +32
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 40
Model card 5 of 20, intended use and parameters only. Training data 5, a domain mix with token counts but no sources or cut-off. Last change 20, README updates on 28 October 2026. Responsiveness 0, Xiaomi answered none of the 14 discussions. Version policy 5, a first release. File health 5, no LICENSE file, a config that lists an MTP layer the weights lack, and template and tool-call reports waiting without a reply.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 72
Model card 17, Intended use, limitations, the architecture, the parameters (3B outside the embeddings), the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of how the fine-tuning and reinforcement learning data was built and filtered, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 15, the last commit, on 11 September 2026, updated modeling_nanbeige.py, 60 days before this check and within 90. Responsiveness 20, Of the 34 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (21 July to 10 September 2026), 20 have a reply from a Nanbeige member, which is most. Version policy 5, Nanbeige's earlier models (Nanbeige4-3B, 4.1-3B) stay in their own repositories, as the Base, FP8, 8-bit and DSpark builds of this one do. File health 10, Config, tokenizer config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 262,144 tokens. 17 + 5 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 72.
Agent interface Nanbeige4.2-3B +15
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format is only in the template and the card names no tool parser. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn and agentic fine-tuning. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request with the reasoning in reasoning_content. Context 10, 262,144 tokens from the base's native length, though the card doesn't say.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Chat template 20, A Jinja chat template in tokenizer_config.json (7,961 characters), with enable_thinking, preserve_thinking, tools and tool_call_format switches. Tool-calling format 25, the card says passing tools switches on the tool template and recommends tool_call_format xml, with json for compatibility, and its SGLang and vLLM commands name the nanbeige tool-call parser, which released SGLang 0.5.23 has. Trained tool calling 20, the card describes fine-tuning on tool-use environments and agent scaffolds and reinforcement learning on agent tasks, and the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Neither the card nor the files mention JSON or JSON Schema output, beyond json as a tool-call format. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking, on by default and False per request, and preserve_thinking for earlier turns, and names the nanbeige reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, which the card says the model supports and config.json gives as max_position_embeddings. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Risk MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +10
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 65
File safety 25, safetensors only and no repository code runs. Provenance 15, the files are in Xiaomi's MiMo organisation, which mimo.xiaomi.com links to, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, the technical report has no safety results. Agent guidance 5, the card's Use Restrictions section (28 October 2026) gives general cautions, with nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, MIT and Apache 2.0 with no conditions, and the card says its restrictions add none. Security programme 5 of 10, Xiaomi's company security centre takes reports, but nothing links it to MiMo and no advisories were found.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the Nanbeige organisation (Nanbeige LLM Lab), which the lab's arXiv report for this model links, so the publisher's own account, although the Hub hasn't verified it (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions: the limitations section says outputs may be inaccurate, biased or harmful. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, no threshold and no clause letting the licensor change or revoke it. Security programme 5, BOSS Zhipin runs a security response centre for reporting flaws in its products, as read for the Nanbeige4.3-33B listing (5), though nothing links it to the model. 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
Reach Nanbeige4.2-3B +5
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 80
Memory 30 of 30, Ollama's library build at q4_K_M is 6.6 GB, 7.9 GB with a fifth added, while Xiaomi's only build is BF16 at 18.85 GB. Runtimes 25, it keeps Qwen3.5-9B's architecture, which released vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run, and Ollama's own library carries this model (entry updated 3 November 2026; the 21 October check found none). Builds 0, Xiaomi publishes no quantised build. Terms 15, MIT on the card over an Apache 2.0 base, both with nothing added. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, no provider serves this distill.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Memory 30, the smallest build from Nanbeige is the FP8 repository (the 8-bit GPTQ one is the same size), 5.19 GB, and 5.19 GB × 1.2 = 6.2 GB, within 16 GB. bartowski's GGUF isn't read for this line. Runtimes 15, Released SGLang 0.5.23 has the model (srt/models/nanbeige.py) with its parsers, llama.cpp b12242 has the nanbeige architecture, and vLLM 0.33.0 names NanbeigeForCausalLM in its registry, served through its Transformers backend. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Nanbeige at two precisions, FP8 and 8-bit GPTQ, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence, with no use policy or other terms on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its FP8 and 8-bit repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and no Nanbeige or BOSS Zhipin API for it was found. 30 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 85.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | Nanbeige4.2-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 85 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 55 | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 40 | 72 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +32 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | Nanbeige4.2-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Xiaomi (MiMo team) | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.5-9B under Apache 2.0 | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Nanbeige4.2-3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
A 9B cousin tuned on MiMo-V2.6's agent work for coding, terminal tasks and visual coding, released as a base for RL research. Ollama's library build needs about 8 GB at 4-bit, while Xiaomi ships only BF16. The main risks are no safety results while a seventh of its tuning is offensive security, and nobody at Xiaomi answering reports.
Nanbeige4.2-3B
A small model built for agent work, with tool calling it was trained for, a thinking switch and a 256K context in about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, from a lab that answers most questions. Its architecture is its own, so check your runtime: SGLang and llama.cpp have it, Transformers needs the repository's code, and Nanbeige ships no GGUF.
Before you call either
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Quickest start is
ollama run mimo-v2.6:9b, Ollama's 6.6 GB q4_K_M build with text and image input - Serve it as the card does,
sglang serve --model-path XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Distill-Qwen-9B --reasoning-parser mimo, and add--tool-call-parser mimofor parsed tool calls - SGLang's mimo reasoning parser expects thinking to be asked for, so pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue, as the card does, and readreasoning_content - Calls come back as function and parameter blocks inside tool_call, the same shape vLLM's and SGLang's qwen3_coder parsers read
- The generation config samples at temperature 0.6, top_k 20 and top_p 0.95
- Images and video go in through Qwen3.5's processor; the template's audio tokens have no audio encoder behind them
- The MTP head isn't in the files, so skip MTP speculative decoding even though config.json lists a layer
- It's an SFT checkpoint meant for further RL, and discussions report runaway generation on llama.cpp, so cap max_tokens
- If you redistribute the weights, include the Apache 2.0 text of Qwen3.5-9B, which section 4(a) asks for and the repository lacks
Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later and pass
--tool-call-parser nanbeige --reasoning-parser nanbeige - Pass
toolsin the request. The card recommendstool_call_format="xml" - Set
preserve_thinkingtrue for multi-turn tool use and coding, false for plain chat - Use temperature 1.0 for agent and tool work and 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- For llama.cpp use b12242 or later. The GGUF files on the Hub are bartowski's, not Nanbeige's
- If you load it with Transformers, read modeling_nanbeige.py first: trust_remote_code runs it
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B or Nanbeige4.2-3B?
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B and Nanbeige4.2-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B or Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Arete-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Arete-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Carbon-X vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cola2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kronos vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b-vs-nanbeige-4-2-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b.json·/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-2-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b nanbeige-4-2-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b", "b": "nanbeige-4-2-3b"}at/mcp, no key