Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
Agents-A1-4B and Nanbeige4.2-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agent loops (search, research, tool calls) on a laptop, a small GPU or a phone-class machine, under a plain licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
Watch for
The base isn't declared, and the technical report doesn't cover the 4B
Best for Local agents that need tool calling and a long context on a laptop or a small GPU
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 72 against 43
Watch for
Its own architecture: Transformers loads it only with the repository's code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Nanbeige4.2-3B +29
Agents-A1-4B 43
Model card 8, it covers intended use, parameters and context but not the architecture, limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general description with no cut-off. Last change 10, the files went up on 14 July 2026, 112 days before 3 November 2026, and the GitHub repository's last commit is 16 July. Responsiveness 10, InternScience answered one of the three discussions, unchanged on 3 November 2026. Version policy 5, a first release. File health 5, the files agree on the essentials, but the config declares a prediction layer that isn't shipped and the template carries a dated default prompt.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 72
Model card 17, Intended use, limitations, the architecture, the parameters (3B outside the embeddings), the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of how the fine-tuning and reinforcement learning data was built and filtered, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 15, the last commit, on 11 September 2026, updated modeling_nanbeige.py, 60 days before this check and within 90. Responsiveness 20, Of the 34 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (21 July to 10 September 2026), 20 have a reply from a Nanbeige member, which is most. Version policy 5, Nanbeige's earlier models (Nanbeige4-3B, 4.1-3B) stay in their own repositories, as the Base, FP8, 8-bit and DSpark builds of this one do. File health 10, Config, tokenizer config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 262,144 tokens. 17 + 5 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 72.
Agent interface Nanbeige4.2-3B +15
Agents-A1-4B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, the card names the qwen3_coder parser but the format is only in the template. Trained tool calling 20, the card says it was trained for tool use and the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0. Reasoning control 10, the template turns thinking off per request and the card's reasoning parser returns it apart from the answer. Context 10, 262,144 tokens.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Chat template 20, A Jinja chat template in tokenizer_config.json (7,961 characters), with enable_thinking, preserve_thinking, tools and tool_call_format switches. Tool-calling format 25, the card says passing tools switches on the tool template and recommends tool_call_format xml, with json for compatibility, and its SGLang and vLLM commands name the nanbeige tool-call parser, which released SGLang 0.5.23 has. Trained tool calling 20, the card describes fine-tuning on tool-use environments and agent scaffolds and reinforcement learning on agent tasks, and the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Neither the card nor the files mention JSON or JSON Schema output, beyond json as a tool-call format. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking, on by default and False per request, and preserve_thinking for earlier turns, and names the nanbeige reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, which the card says the model supports and config.json gives as max_position_embeddings. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Reach Agents-A1-4B +5
Agents-A1-4B 90
Memory 30, InternScience's Q4_K_M GGUF with its vision projector is 3.4 GB and needs about 4.1 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes 20, the Qwen3.5 architecture runs in released vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp, while Ollama's and LM Studio's entries are the base's, not this model's. Builds 15, InternScience publishes FP8 and three GGUF precisions. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, one inference provider serves it and the line needs two.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Memory 30, the smallest build from Nanbeige is the FP8 repository (the 8-bit GPTQ one is the same size), 5.19 GB, and 5.19 GB × 1.2 = 6.2 GB, within 16 GB. bartowski's GGUF isn't read for this line. Runtimes 15, Released SGLang 0.5.23 has the model (srt/models/nanbeige.py) with its parsers, llama.cpp b12242 has the nanbeige architecture, and vLLM 0.33.0 names NanbeigeForCausalLM in its registry, served through its Transformers backend. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Nanbeige at two precisions, FP8 and 8-bit GPTQ, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence, with no use policy or other terms on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its FP8 and 8-bit repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and no Nanbeige or BOSS Zhipin API for it was found. 30 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 85.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Agents-A1-4B | Nanbeige4.2-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | Agents-A1-4B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 43 | 72 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Agents-A1-4B | Nanbeige4.2-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | InternScience (Shanghai AI Laboratory) | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Agents-A1-4B
A small agent cousin for search, research and tool-calling loops, with vision and 262,144 tokens of context. It runs in about 4 GB from InternScience's Q4_K_M GGUF, in vLLM, SGLang, Transformers or llama.cpp. The main risks are an undeclared base, no safety results or agent guidance, and a template that adds its own dated system prompt when you send none.
Nanbeige4.2-3B
A small model built for agent work, with tool calling it was trained for, a thinking switch and a 256K context in about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, from a lab that answers most questions. Its architecture is its own, so check your runtime: SGLang and llama.cpp have it, Transformers needs the repository's code, and Nanbeige ships no GGUF.
Before you call either
Agents-A1-4B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf InternScience/Agents-A1-4B-Q4_K_M-GGUF --jinja, about 3.4 GB with the vision projector - With vLLM use
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as on the card, and add--language-model-onlyfor text-only work - Always send your own system message, or the template inserts InternScience's default prompt with the date fixed at 2026-07-14
- The card recommends temperature 0.85, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, min_p 0 and presence_penalty 1.1, and there is no generation_config.json to set them
- Thinking is on by default, send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - The config declares a multi-token prediction layer that isn't shipped, so don't turn on MTP speculative decoding
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later and pass
--tool-call-parser nanbeige --reasoning-parser nanbeige - Pass
toolsin the request. The card recommendstool_call_format="xml" - Set
preserve_thinkingtrue for multi-turn tool use and coding, false for plain chat - Use temperature 1.0 for agent and tool work and 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- For llama.cpp use b12242 or later. The GGUF files on the Hub are bartowski's, not Nanbeige's
- If you load it with Transformers, read modeling_nanbeige.py first: trust_remote_code runs it
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Agents-A1-4B or Nanbeige4.2-3B?
Agents-A1-4B and Nanbeige4.2-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Agents-A1-4B or Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Apertus v1.5 8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Apodex-1.1-mini
- Agents-A1-4B vs Arete-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs BigBang-v1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Carbon-X
- Agents-A1-4B vs Cola2
- Agents-A1-4B vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Agents-A1-4B vs Devstral Small 2
- Agents-A1-4B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3
- Agents-A1-4B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Hy3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling-Small
- Agents-A1-4B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kolibri-1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kronos
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna M.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs LBS-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Mistral Large 4
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Agents-A1-4B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs occamy-1.0
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Agents-A1-4B vs Recursive Flint
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Agents-A1-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Agents-A1-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Arete-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/agents-a1-4b-vs-nanbeige-4-2-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/agents-a1-4b.json·/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-2-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare agents-a1-4b nanbeige-4-2-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "agents-a1-4b", "b": "nanbeige-4-2-3b"}at/mcp, no key