Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nanbeige4.2-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.9 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents or teams with a multi-GPU server, or a provider account, who want DeepSeek's V4 agent model under MIT with a 1M context
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The smallest 4-bit build is 156.4 GB, so it needs about 188 GB and doesn't fit a 128 GB machine
Best for Local agents that need tool calling and a long context on a laptop or a small GPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 70
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 72 against 38
Watch for
Its own architecture: Transformers loads it only with the repository's code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Nanbeige4.2-3B +34
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 38
Model card 8, the card and the DSpark card it names give architecture, parameters and context, with intended use, limitations, languages and cut-off missing. Training data 5, a general description in the report with no cut-off. Last change 10, a card edit on 1 August 2026, 93 days before 2 November, so past 90 and within 180; deepseek-recipe 0.2.0 (20 October) stays read as a library-wide release, not a change to this model's files. Responsiveness 0, DeepSeek answered none of the 61 discussions, the newest opened on 17 October. Version policy 10, the preview and DSpark copies keep their own repositories and the dated 0731 release says what it supersedes. File health 5, the files agree with each other, but reports of tool-call errors and looping and a pull request for a missing chat template wait without a reply from DeepSeek.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 72
Model card 17, Intended use, limitations, the architecture, the parameters (3B outside the embeddings), the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of how the fine-tuning and reinforcement learning data was built and filtered, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 15, the last commit, on 11 September 2026, updated modeling_nanbeige.py, 60 days before this check and within 90. Responsiveness 20, Of the 34 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (21 July to 10 September 2026), 20 have a reply from a Nanbeige member, which is most. Version policy 5, Nanbeige's earlier models (Nanbeige4-3B, 4.1-3B) stay in their own repositories, as the Base, FP8, 8-bit and DSpark builds of this one do. File health 10, Config, tokenizer config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 262,144 tokens. 17 + 5 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 72.
Reach Nanbeige4.2-3B +15
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 70
Memory 5, because the smallest build of 4-bit or better from a runtime's own library is LM Studio's MXFP4 GGUF at 156.4 GB, which with a fifth added needs 187.7 GB, more than our 107.4 GB machine and within 256 GB. DeepSeek's own release, 166.9 GB, sits in the same band. Runtimes 25, the cap, from vLLM v0.32.0, SGLang v0.5.22, llama.cpp release b11771, Transformers 5.20.0 and LM Studio's library, with Ollama not counted since its library entry is retired with no models pushed. Builds 10, DeepSeek ships one build, the FP8 and FP4 release itself. Terms 15, MIT with nothing added. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 5, DeepSeek's API moved to V4.1 Flash, but five inference providers on Hugging Face serve this repository live (Together's mapping has gone since 21 October).
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Memory 30, the smallest build from Nanbeige is the FP8 repository (the 8-bit GPTQ one is the same size), 5.19 GB, and 5.19 GB × 1.2 = 6.2 GB, within 16 GB. bartowski's GGUF isn't read for this line. Runtimes 15, Released SGLang 0.5.23 has the model (srt/models/nanbeige.py) with its parsers, llama.cpp b12242 has the nanbeige architecture, and vLLM 0.33.0 names NanbeigeForCausalLM in its registry, served through its Transformers backend. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Nanbeige at two precisions, FP8 and 8-bit GPTQ, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence, with no use policy or other terms on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its FP8 and 8-bit repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and no Nanbeige or BOSS Zhipin API for it was found. 30 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 85.
Agent interface Nanbeige4.2-3B +10
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 75
Chat template 10, there is no Jinja template and the format is given as Python to run. Tool-calling format 10, DeepSeek documents how tools are declared and returned and ships its own parser, but only vLLM's recipe names a runtime parser, so the 25 line isn't met. Trained tool calling 20, several invoke elements in one call block. Structured output 15, DeepSeek's deepseek-recipe library documents JSON Schema response formats for V4 prompts. Reasoning control 10, chat mode with no thinking and three effort levels in thinking mode, with reasoning returned as reasoning_content. Context 10, 1M tokens trained.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Chat template 20, A Jinja chat template in tokenizer_config.json (7,961 characters), with enable_thinking, preserve_thinking, tools and tool_call_format switches. Tool-calling format 25, the card says passing tools switches on the tool template and recommends tool_call_format xml, with json for compatibility, and its SGLang and vLLM commands name the nanbeige tool-call parser, which released SGLang 0.5.23 has. Trained tool calling 20, the card describes fine-tuning on tool-use environments and agent scaffolds and reinforcement learning on agent tasks, and the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Neither the card nor the files mention JSON or JSON Schema output, beyond json as a tool-call format. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking, on by default and False per request, and preserve_thinking for earlier turns, and names the nanbeige reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, which the card says the model supports and config.json gives as max_position_embeddings. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Risk Nanbeige4.2-3B +5
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 50
File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 because prompts are built by running DeepSeek's encoding_dsv4.py from the repository and the card's serving commands pass --trust-remote-code. Provenance 15, the deepseek-ai organisation and a SHA-256 on every shard. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 0, the encoding README's notes about the parser and the reserved developer role are usage notes, read alike for all three DeepSeek listings. Licence risk 15, MIT with no deductions. Security programme 5, for the security@deepseek.com reporting address in DeepSeek's site footer, read as for DeepSeek-V3.2, with no security.txt and no public advisories.
Nanbeige4.2-3B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the Nanbeige organisation (Nanbeige LLM Lab), which the lab's arXiv report for this model links, so the publisher's own account, although the Hub hasn't verified it (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions: the limitations section says outputs may be inaccurate, biased or harmful. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, no threshold and no clause letting the licensor change or revoke it. Security programme 5, BOSS Zhipin runs a security response centre for reporting flaws in its products, as read for the Nanbeige4.3-33B listing (5), though nothing links it to the model. 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Nanbeige4.2-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 85 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 85 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 38 | 72 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +34 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61.9/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Nanbeige4.2-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Nanbeige4.2-3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
A long-context agent cousin under MIT with documented tool calls, three reasoning effort levels and support in every major runtime but Ollama. It needs about 190 to 200 GB of memory, though five inference providers serve it. The main risks are prompts built from DeepSeek's Python, no published safety results and no answers in its repository.
Nanbeige4.2-3B
A small model built for agent work, with tool calling it was trained for, a thinking switch and a 256K context in about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, from a lab that answers most questions. Its architecture is its own, so check your runtime: SGLang and llama.cpp have it, Transformers needs the repository's code, and Nanbeige ships no GGUF.
Before you call either
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 --trust-remote-code --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --block-size 256 --data-parallel-size 4 --enable-expert-parallel --moe-backend deep_gemm_mega_moe --attention-config '{"use_fp4_indexer_cache": true}' --speculative-config '{"method":"dspark","num_speculative_tokens":7,"draft_sample_method":"greedy"}' --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v4 --tool-call-parser deepseek_v4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser deepseek_v4 (the card's 4x GB300 example plus the parser flags from vLLM's recipe)
- Build prompts with encoding_dsv4.py, deepseek-recipe's V4 encoder or vLLM's --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v4, since the repository has no Jinja template
- Tool calls come back in a DSML tool_calls block with invoke elements, string parameters carry string="true" and JSON values string="false"
- Set temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for agent work, and allow up to 384K output tokens at reasoning effort high or max
- Without the hardware, call it through a Hugging Face inference provider (DeepInfra, Novita, Baseten, Scaleway, Featherless), not DeepSeek's API, where deepseek-v4-flash now means V4.1 Flash
- LM Studio's library build is a 156.4 GB MXFP4 GGUF and LM Studio states 156 GB minimum system memory
Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later and pass
--tool-call-parser nanbeige --reasoning-parser nanbeige - Pass
toolsin the request. The card recommendstool_call_format="xml" - Set
preserve_thinkingtrue for multi-turn tool use and coding, false for plain chat - Use temperature 1.0 for agent and tool work and 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- For llama.cpp use b12242 or later. The GGUF files on the Hub are bartowski's, not Nanbeige's
- If you load it with Transformers, read modeling_nanbeige.py first: trust_remote_code runs it
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Nanbeige4.2-3B?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nanbeige4.2-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.9 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.2-3B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Arete-27B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Arete-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cola2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Devstral Small 2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-vs-nanbeige-4-2-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v4-flash-0731.json·/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-2-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v4-flash-0731 nanbeige-4-2-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v4-flash-0731", "b": "nanbeige-4-2-3b"}at/mcp, no key