Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
Nanbeige4.2-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents that need tool calling and a long context on a laptop or a small GPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 72 against 36
Watch for
Its own architecture: Transformers loads it only with the repository's code
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Nanbeige4.2-3B +36
Nanbeige4.2-3B 72
Model card 17, Intended use, limitations, the architecture, the parameters (3B outside the embeddings), the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of how the fine-tuning and reinforcement learning data was built and filtered, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 15, the last commit, on 11 September 2026, updated modeling_nanbeige.py, 60 days before this check and within 90. Responsiveness 20, Of the 34 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (21 July to 10 September 2026), 20 have a reply from a Nanbeige member, which is most. Version policy 5, Nanbeige's earlier models (Nanbeige4-3B, 4.1-3B) stay in their own repositories, as the Base, FP8, 8-bit and DSpark builds of this one do. File health 10, Config, tokenizer config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 262,144 tokens. 17 + 5 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 72.
Ornith-1.5-397B 36
Model card 11, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a description of the method with no data or cut-off. Last change 20, Ornith uploaded new shards to the NVFP4 build on 20 October 2026. Responsiveness 0, nobody from Ornith answered either of the 2 questions, or any of the six on its GGUF and NVFP4 builds. Version policy 0, every GGUF file and the NVFP4 shards were replaced in place in August with no note. File health 0, the card links a missing LICENSE, the two chat templates differ, and the NVFP4 build carries shards its index doesn't use.
Reach Nanbeige4.2-3B +20
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Memory 30, the smallest build from Nanbeige is the FP8 repository (the 8-bit GPTQ one is the same size), 5.19 GB, and 5.19 GB × 1.2 = 6.2 GB, within 16 GB. bartowski's GGUF isn't read for this line. Runtimes 15, Released SGLang 0.5.23 has the model (srt/models/nanbeige.py) with its parsers, llama.cpp b12242 has the nanbeige architecture, and vLLM 0.33.0 names NanbeigeForCausalLM in its registry, served through its Transformers backend. Builds 15, Quantised builds from Nanbeige at two precisions, FP8 and 8-bit GPTQ, each in its own repository. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata, an OSI licence, with no use policy or other terms on the card. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its FP8 and 8-bit repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and no Nanbeige or BOSS Zhipin API for it was found. 30 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 85.
Ornith-1.5-397B 65
Memory 0, since the smallest 4-bit build, Ollama's at 242 GB, needs about 290 GB with the fifth added, above the 256 GB band, and Ornith's own Q4_K_M GGUF and NVFP4 builds need about the same. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.19.1, SGLang 0.5.9, Transformers 5.8.1, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture and Ollama's library, while LM Studio's entry is the base's. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4 and GGUF at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata on 21 October 2026, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it.
Risk Nanbeige4.2-3B +5
Nanbeige4.2-3B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the Nanbeige organisation (Nanbeige LLM Lab), which the lab's arXiv report for this model links, so the publisher's own account, although the Hub hasn't verified it (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions: the limitations section says outputs may be inaccurate, biased or harmful. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, no threshold and no clause letting the licensor change or revoke it. Security programme 5, BOSS Zhipin runs a security response centre for reporting flaws in its products, as read for the Nanbeige4.3-33B listing (5), though nothing links it to the model. 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
Ornith-1.5-397B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nanbeige4.2-3B | Ornith-1.5-397B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 65 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 72 | 36 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +36 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nanbeige4.2-3B | Ornith-1.5-397B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nanbeige4.2-3B
A small model built for agent work, with tool calling it was trained for, a thinking switch and a 256K context in about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, from a lab that answers most questions. Its architecture is its own, so check your runtime: SGLang and llama.cpp have it, Transformers needs the repository's code, and Nanbeige ships no GGUF.
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's largest coding and terminal-agent model, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risks are a missing licence file, no safety results, no publisher replies and files replaced without a note.
Before you call either
Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later and pass
--tool-call-parser nanbeige --reasoning-parser nanbeige - Pass
toolsin the request. The card recommendstool_call_format="xml" - Set
preserve_thinkingtrue for multi-turn tool use and coding, false for plain chat - Use temperature 1.0 for agent and tool work and 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- For llama.cpp use b12242 or later. The GGUF files on the Hub are bartowski's, not Nanbeige's
- If you load it with Transformers, read modeling_nanbeige.py first: trust_remote_code runs it
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nanbeige4.2-3B or Ornith-1.5-397B?
Nanbeige4.2-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Nanbeige4.2-3B or Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Arete-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nanbeige-4-2-3b-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-2-3b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nanbeige-4-2-3b ornith-1-5-397b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nanbeige-4-2-3b", "b": "ornith-1-5-397b"}at/mcp, no key