Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
Ornith-1.5-397B scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507's 55.7 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 36 against 26
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Best for Agents that want a capable small instruct model on a laptop, phone-class device or spare GPU, with a plain licence and long context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 65
- Risk, 55 against 50
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ornith-1.5-397B | Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 95 | Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Ornith-1.5-397B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 26 | Ornith-1.5-397B +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59/100 | C 55.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ornith-1.5-397B | Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ornith | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-23 | 2025-09-17 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's flagship coding and terminal-agent cousin, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results and files replaced without a note.
Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
A small, fast cousin for instruction following, short tool-calling jobs and long documents on modest hardware, with no thinking step. It runs in about 3 GB at 4 bits on every common runtime, and two providers host it. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes in over a year, no answers from Alibaba and no safety results.
Before you call either
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Quickest start is
ollama run qwen3:4b-instruct, 2.5 GB. Plainqwen3:4bis the Thinking-2507 edition, not this one - On our reference machine use BF16 with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes - Use the hermes parser in vLLM or qwen25 in SGLang, the template emits JSON inside tool_call tags
- Don't pass enable_thinking, this edition never thinks and the card says the flag isn't needed
- Sampling per the card is temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and min_p 0, with presence_penalty up to 2 against repetition
- Drop the context to 32,768 tokens if memory runs out, as the card suggests
- Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ornith-1.5-397B or Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507?
Ornith-1.5-397B scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507's 55.7 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with Ornith-1.5-397B or Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ornith-1-5-397b-vs-qwen3-4b-instruct-2507.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-4b-instruct-2507.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ornith-1-5-397b qwen3-4b-instruct-2507(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ornith-1-5-397b", "b": "qwen3-4b-instruct-2507"}at/mcp, no key