Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SmolLM3-3B
Nanbeige4.2-3B and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents that need tool calling and a long context on a laptop or a small GPU
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 80
Watch for
Its own architecture: Transformers loads it only with the repository's code
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk SmolLM3-3B +10
Nanbeige4.2-3B 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the Nanbeige organisation (Nanbeige LLM Lab), which the lab's arXiv report for this model links, so the publisher's own account, although the Hub hasn't verified it (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions: the limitations section says outputs may be inaccurate, biased or harmful. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, no threshold and no clause letting the licensor change or revoke it. Security programme 5, BOSS Zhipin runs a security response centre for reporting flaws in its products, as read for the Nanbeige4.3-33B listing (5), though nothing links it to the model. 15 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 55.
SmolLM3-3B 65
File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs on load or to build prompts. Provenance 15, the HuggingFaceTB organisation linked from Hugging Face's launch post, with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 5, only the general cautions in the card's Limitations section. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added and a working licence link. Security programme 5, huggingface.co has a valid security.txt and Transformers has a security policy; whether advisories are handled in public couldn't be checked from our session, so that half is scored as absent.
Agent interface Nanbeige4.2-3B +5
Nanbeige4.2-3B 85
Chat template 20, A Jinja chat template in tokenizer_config.json (7,961 characters), with enable_thinking, preserve_thinking, tools and tool_call_format switches. Tool-calling format 25, the card says passing tools switches on the tool template and recommends tool_call_format xml, with json for compatibility, and its SGLang and vLLM commands name the nanbeige tool-call parser, which released SGLang 0.5.23 has. Trained tool calling 20, the card describes fine-tuning on tool-use environments and agent scaffolds and reinforcement learning on agent tasks, and the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Neither the card nor the files mention JSON or JSON Schema output, beyond json as a tool-call format. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking, on by default and False per request, and preserve_thinking for earlier turns, and names the nanbeige reasoning parser, which returns the reasoning apart from the answer. Context 10, 262,144 tokens, which the card says the model supports and config.json gives as max_position_embeddings. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
SmolLM3-3B 80
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card says how tools are declared, how calls come back and which vLLM parser to use. Trained tool calling 20, the template invites one or more calls per turn, each in its own block. Structured output 0, nothing documents asking the weights for JSON. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request through the kwarg or a system-prompt flag, and the reasoning comes back in think tags. Context 5, trained at 65,536 tokens, with 131,072 only through YaRN.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nanbeige4.2-3B | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 80 | Nanbeige4.2-3B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 72 | 74 | SmolLM3-3B +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nanbeige4.2-3B | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Nanbeige4.2-3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Nanbeige4.2-3B
A small model built for agent work, with tool calling it was trained for, a thinking switch and a 256K context in about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, from a lab that answers most questions. Its architecture is its own, so check your runtime: SGLang and llama.cpp have it, Transformers needs the repository's code, and Nanbeige ships no GGUF.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no staff reply in its discussions since November 2025.
Before you call either
Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later and pass
--tool-call-parser nanbeige --reasoning-parser nanbeige - Pass
toolsin the request. The card recommendstool_call_format="xml" - Set
preserve_thinkingtrue for multi-turn tool use and coding, false for plain chat - Use temperature 1.0 for agent and tool work and 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- For llama.cpp use b12242 or later. The GGUF files on the Hub are bartowski's, not Nanbeige's
- If you load it with Transformers, read modeling_nanbeige.py first: trust_remote_code runs it
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nanbeige4.2-3B or SmolLM3-3B?
Nanbeige4.2-3B and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on risk.
Other comparisons with Nanbeige4.2-3B or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- Arete-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Arete-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Carbon-X vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cola2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cola2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Kronos vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Recursive Flint vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SmolLM3-3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nanbeige-4-2-3b-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-2-3b.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nanbeige-4-2-3b smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nanbeige-4-2-3b", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key