Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B

SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Laguna M.1 C

Best for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0.

Ahead on

  • Agent interface, 85 against 80

Watch for

The smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine

SmolLM3-3B C

Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device

Ahead on

  • Reach, 85 against 65
  • Risk, 65 against 55
  • Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 36

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.5 out of 5

Watch for

65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLaguna M.1SmolLM3-3BEdge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%256585SmolLM3-3B +20
Risk20%205565SmolLM3-3B +10
Agent interface10%108580Laguna M.1 +5
Documentation and upkeep10%103654SmolLM3-3B +18
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 55.5/100C 61/100

Facts side by side

FactLaguna M.1SmolLM3-3B
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorPoolsideHugging Face
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-07-142025-09-10
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.5/5 (4)3.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Laguna M.1

A large coding and agent cousin under plain Apache 2.0, for agents with a multi-GPU server. Its smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine, and no local runtime library packages it. The main risks are no upkeep since July, no hosted fallback shown today, no safety results, and repository code on the SGLang route.

SmolLM3-3B

A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build for ONNX Runtime. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no repository changes since September 2025.

Before you call either

Laguna M.1

  1. Run the NVFP4 build on Blackwell GPUs with vllm serve poolside/Laguna-M.1-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 2 --tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on vLLM 0.21.0 or later
  2. Thinking is off in the template unless you pass enable_thinking true or start the server with --default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding
  3. Pass earlier reasoning back as reasoning_content in the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped
  4. Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
  5. The FP8 build's Docker image and serve.sh predate upstream support and set a 4,096-token context, so prefer a released vLLM
  6. It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any published precision
  7. Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented

SmolLM3-3B

  1. Start it with vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text
  2. Pass chat_template_kwargs with enable_thinking false for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a /think or /no_think flag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg
  3. Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a tool_calls field when it renders history
  4. Add the YaRN rope_scaling block (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens
  5. Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
  6. Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
  7. Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Laguna M.1 or SmolLM3-3B?

SmolLM3-3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on agent interface.

Other comparisons with Laguna M.1 or SmolLM3-3B

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.