Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Carbon-X vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Carbon-X's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Carbon-X leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3023 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Carbon-X C
Best for Agents that need a second opinion on DNA variants and regulatory regions on a 16 to 24 GB machine, without sending sequences to a hosted model.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 70
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 77 against 43
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
Not clinically validated and no wet-lab validation reported
Best for Agents or teams with a multi-GPU server, or a provider account, who want DeepSeek's V4 agent model under MIT with a 1M context
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 35
Watch for
The smallest 4-bit build is 156.4 GB, so it needs about 188 GB and doesn't fit a 128 GB machine
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Carbon-X | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 70 | Carbon-X +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 50 | Carbon-X +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 35 | 75 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 +40 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 77 | 43 | Carbon-X +34 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 62.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Carbon-X | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Hugging Face (HuggingFaceBio) | DeepSeek |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-22 | 2026-07-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Carbon-X
A DNA specialist cousin that another agent calls for variant-effect and sequence questions, with DNA kept on the machine. Hugging Face's Q4_K_M GGUF needs about 12 GB and Q8_0 about 19 GB, on llama.cpp b11742 or later. It isn't clinically validated, it isn't trained for tool calls or reasoning, and the card contradicts its own GGUF repository on llama.cpp support.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
A long-context agent cousin under MIT with documented tool calls, three reasoning effort levels and support in every major runtime but Ollama. It needs about 190 to 200 GB of memory, though six inference providers serve it. The main risks are prompts built from DeepSeek's Python, no published safety results and no answers in its repository.
Before you call either
Carbon-X
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf HuggingFaceBio/Carbon-X-GGUF:Q8_0 -ngl 99 -c 40960 --jinja --chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": false}' --temp 0.6 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0, on llama.cpp b11742 or later - With vLLM or Transformers pass trust_remote_code, and expect the tokenizer to fetch Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Base at a pinned revision on first load
- Keep enable_thinking false and the card's sampling (temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), the settings every reported result used
- Keep DNA in files and pass sequences by name, compute positions and base changes in code and send them as context, the card says the model miscounts long sequences
- Only A, C, G and T form 6-mers, so filter N and other IUPAC codes first or they become a single oov token
- Strip the dna tags from answers if you need bare sequence, llama.cpp keeps them in the text
- Cap max_tokens for next-base questions, long DNA generation is slow and degrades
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 --trust-remote-code --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --block-size 256 --data-parallel-size 4 --enable-expert-parallel --moe-backend deep_gemm_mega_moe --attention-config '{"use_fp4_indexer_cache": true}' --speculative-config '{"method":"dspark","num_speculative_tokens":7,"draft_sample_method":"greedy"}' --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v4 --tool-call-parser deepseek_v4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser deepseek_v4 (the card's 4x GB300 example plus the parser flags from vLLM's recipe)
- Build prompts with encoding_dsv4.py, deepseek-recipe's V4 encoder or vLLM's --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v4, since the repository has no Jinja template
- Tool calls come back in a DSML tool_calls block with invoke elements, string parameters carry string="true" and JSON values string="false"
- Set temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for agent work, and allow up to 384K output tokens at reasoning effort high or max
- Without the hardware, call it through a Hugging Face inference provider (Together, DeepInfra, Novita, Baseten, Scaleway, Featherless), not DeepSeek's API, where deepseek-v4-flash now means V4.1 Flash
- LM Studio's library build is a 156.4 GB MXFP4 GGUF and LM Studio states 156 GB minimum system memory
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Carbon-X or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Carbon-X's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Carbon-X leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Carbon-X or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Agents-A1-4B vs Carbon-X
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Carbon-X
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Carbon-X
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- BigBang-v1 vs Carbon-X
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Carbon-X vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Carbon-X vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Carbon-X vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Carbon-X vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Carbon-X vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Carbon-X vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Carbon-X vs GLM-5.3
- Carbon-X vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-120b
- Carbon-X vs gpt-oss-20b
- Carbon-X vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Carbon-X vs Hy3
- Carbon-X vs Inkling
- Carbon-X vs Inkling-Small
- Carbon-X vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Carbon-X vs Kimi K3
- Carbon-X vs Kolibri-1
- Carbon-X vs Laguna M.1
- Carbon-X vs Laguna S 2.1
- Carbon-X vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Carbon-X vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Carbon-X vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Carbon-X vs occamy-1.0
- Carbon-X vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Carbon-X vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Carbon-X vs Recursive Flint
- Carbon-X vs SmolLM3-3B
- Carbon-X vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Carbon-X vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Carbon-X vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Carbon-X vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/carbon-x-vs-deepseek-v4-flash-0731.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/carbon-x.json·/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v4-flash-0731.json - From a terminal
anchor compare carbon-x deepseek-v4-flash-0731(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "carbon-x", "b": "deepseek-v4-flash-0731"}at/mcp, no key