Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.1-flash-1019 leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 40
Watch for
574 GB in FP8 with no smaller build from inclusionAI, so no single machine under 690 GB of GPU memory runs it
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small coding and terminal-agent model to fine-tune further on a 24 GB GPU, or to run at 4-bit through Ollama in about 8 GB.
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 60
- Risk, 65 against 45
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
Watch for
Only BF16 from Xiaomi, about 23 GB to run; the smaller builds are Ollama's
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +20
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build. Runtimes 25, Released model code in Transformers 5.22.2 (bailing_hybrid), vLLM 0.33.0 (BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM, with ling3 tool and reasoning parsers), SGLang 0.5.23 (bailing_moe_v3.py, its bailing_hybrid config and MTP module) and llama.cpp b12242 (bailingmoe3), and Ollama, credited through its pinned llama.cpp as on the Ling-3.0-tiny listing: v0.40.16 sets LLAMA_CPP_VERSION to b12177. Builds 10, the release is FP8, the one quantised precision inclusionAI publishes for it. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, with no use policy or other terms added on the card or in the repository. Download 10, the Hub API's model info gives gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, the Hub API's provider mapping is empty for this repository on 10 November 2026. 0 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 80
Memory 30 of 30, Ollama's library build at q4_K_M is 6.6 GB, 7.9 GB with a fifth added, while Xiaomi's only build is BF16 at 18.85 GB. Runtimes 25, it keeps Qwen3.5-9B's architecture, which released vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run, and Ollama's own library carries this model (entry updated 3 November 2026; the 21 October check found none). Builds 0, Xiaomi publishes no quantised build. Terms 15, MIT on the card over an Apache 2.0 base, both with nothing added. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, no provider serves this distill.
Risk MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +20
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the repository's configuration_bailing_moe_v3.py, since vLLM 0.33.0 registers no bailing_hybrid config of its own. Provenance 15, files in the inclusionAI organisation that inclusion-ai.org links to, per the Ling-3.0-tiny listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results for the model on its card or in the training-content summary. Agent guidance 0, the card has nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards, and inclusionAI publishes no guardrail probe for this model as it did for Ling 3.0. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no field-of-use limits, no threshold and no clause letting inclusionAI change or revoke it. Security programme 0, www.inclusion-ai.org answers 404 for security.txt on 10 November 2026, and the Ling-3.0-tiny listing found no SECURITY.md or disclosure policy in the inclusionAI .github repository. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 65
File safety 25, safetensors only and no repository code runs. Provenance 15, the files are in Xiaomi's MiMo organisation, which mimo.xiaomi.com links to, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, the technical report has no safety results. Agent guidance 5, the card's Use Restrictions section (28 October 2026) gives general cautions, with nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, MIT and Apache 2.0 with no conditions, and the card says its restrictions add none. Security programme 5 of 10, Xiaomi's company security centre takes reports, but nothing links it to MiMo and no advisories were found.
Documentation and upkeep Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +16
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56
Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claimed) are on the card. Training data 15, the training-content summary the card links names the source categories (Common Crawl and other public datasets, commercially licensed data, the Ant Spider crawler, synthetic data), the size band (over 10 trillion text tokens), data collected up to about July 2026 and the filtering, without listing datasets with sizes. Last change 20, the newest commit, on 4 November 2026, edited the card, six days before this check, and the files went up on 27 October. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (both opened on 27 October 2026) has a reply from an inclusionAI member. Version policy 5, the update went into a repository of its own and Ling-3.1-flash and Ling 3.0 stay in theirs. File health 5, the card states a 1M-token context while config.json gives 262,144 with no rope scaling, and its serve commands name the earlier repository as the model path. 11 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 56.
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 40
Model card 5 of 20, intended use and parameters only. Training data 5, a domain mix with token counts but no sources or cut-off. Last change 20, README updates on 28 October 2026. Responsiveness 0, Xiaomi answered none of the 14 discussions. Version policy 5, a first release. File health 5, no LICENSE file, a config that lists an MTP layer the weights lack, and template and tool-call reports waiting without a reply.
Agent interface MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +10
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared (JSON in <tools>) and how calls come back (<tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs). Trained tool calling 20, the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and loops over every entry in an assistant message's tool_calls, and the card reports gains on agentic benchmarks, AA-Briefcase and AutomationBench-AA among them. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output. Reasoning control 0, the card documents turning thinking on or off per request with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking, and names the ling3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say where the reasoning text comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens natively in config.json (max_position_embeddings 262144, rope_scaling null) and per SGLang's cookbook. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 60.
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format is only in the template and the card names no tool parser. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn and agentic fine-tuning. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request with the reasoning in reasoning_content. Context 10, 262,144 tokens from the base's native length, though the card doesn't say.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 80 | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 65 | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 70 | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 40 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.8/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Xiaomi (MiMo team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.5-9B under Apache 2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
inclusionAI's newest flagship, a 560B hybrid mixture of experts under plain MIT that vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run in released versions. It ships only as 574 GB of FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The card overstates the context, documents little about tool calls, and has no safety results.
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
A 9B cousin tuned on MiMo-V2.6's agent work for coding, terminal tasks and visual coding, released as a base for RL research. Ollama's library build needs about 8 GB at 4-bit, while Xiaomi ships only BF16. The main risks are no safety results while a seventh of its tuning is offensive security, and nobody at Xiaomi answering reports.
Before you call either
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later on 8 H200 or 4 GB300 GPUs, per the card, and use this repository's name as the model path, not the earlier one the card's command shows
- With vLLM pass
--trust-remote-code,--tool-call-parser ling3and--reasoning-parser ling3 - Set
chat_template_kwargsenable_thinkingfalse for direct answers. Reasoning comes back inreasoning_contentper SGLang's cookbook - Plan on 262,144 tokens of context. The 1M figure needs the YaRN override in SGLang's cookbook
- Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, per the card
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Quickest start is
ollama run mimo-v2.6:9b, Ollama's 6.6 GB q4_K_M build with text and image input - Serve it as the card does,
sglang serve --model-path XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Distill-Qwen-9B --reasoning-parser mimo, and add--tool-call-parser mimofor parsed tool calls - SGLang's mimo reasoning parser expects thinking to be asked for, so pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue, as the card does, and readreasoning_content - Calls come back as function and parameter blocks inside tool_call, the same shape vLLM's and SGLang's qwen3_coder parsers read
- The generation config samples at temperature 0.6, top_k 20 and top_p 0.95
- Images and video go in through Qwen3.5's processor; the template's audio tokens have no audio encoder behind them
- The MTP head isn't in the files, so skip MTP speculative decoding even though config.json lists a layer
- It's an SFT checkpoint meant for further RL, and discussions report runaway generation on llama.cpp, so cap max_tokens
- If you redistribute the weights, include the Apache 2.0 text of Qwen3.5-9B, which section 4(a) asks for and the repository lacks
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B?
MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.1-flash-1019 leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Arete-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Arete-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- BigBang-v1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Cola2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cola2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kolibri-1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kronos vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kronos vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Mistral Large 4
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs occamy-1.0
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Recursive Flint
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.json·/api/v1/tools/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-1-flash-1019 mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-1-flash-1019", "b": "mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b"}at/mcp, no key