Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Kimi K3.1 Pro's 48.6 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Kimi K3.1 Pro leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with a multi-accelerator node who want Moonshot's newest open-weight model for coding and long agent sessions, and everyone else through an API
Ahead on
- Risk, 50 against 45
- Agent interface, 65 against 60
Watch for
1,561 GB of files, so it needs a node of eight large accelerators at least
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding
Ahead on
- Reach, 60 against 40
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 51
Watch for
574 GB in FP8 with no smaller build from inclusionAI, so no single machine under 690 GB of GPU memory runs it
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +20
Kimi K3.1 Pro 40
Memory 0, the only build is Moonshot's 1,561 GB MXFP4 release, far above 256 GB. Runtimes 5, llama.cpp b12242 alone has the model code in a release, since vLLM's recipe needs 0.34.0 and SGLang's cookbook a branch. Builds 10, one precision. Terms 10, free commercial use below a model-as-a-service revenue threshold. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 5, Moonshot's API and Together serve it. 0 + 5 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 40.
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build. Runtimes 25, Released model code in Transformers 5.22.2 (bailing_hybrid), vLLM 0.33.0 (BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM, with ling3 tool and reasoning parsers), SGLang 0.5.23 (bailing_moe_v3.py, its bailing_hybrid config and MTP module) and llama.cpp b12242 (bailingmoe3), and Ollama, credited through its pinned llama.cpp as on the Ling-3.0-tiny listing: v0.40.16 sets LLAMA_CPP_VERSION to b12177. Builds 10, the release is FP8, the one quantised precision inclusionAI publishes for it. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, with no use policy or other terms added on the card or in the repository. Download 10, the Hub API's model info gives gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, the Hub API's provider mapping is empty for this repository on 10 November 2026. 0 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.
Risk Kimi K3.1 Pro +5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 50
File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 for remote code and prompts built by the repository's script. Provenance 15, Moonshot's own organisation with a hash on every file. Safety evaluation 10, Moonshot's own cyber benchmark results and nobody else's yet. Agent guidance 0, none on the card. Licence risk 10, the revenue threshold. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 50.
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the repository's configuration_bailing_moe_v3.py, since vLLM 0.33.0 registers no bailing_hybrid config of its own. Provenance 15, files in the inclusionAI organisation that inclusion-ai.org links to, per the Ling-3.0-tiny listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results for the model on its card or in the training-content summary. Agent guidance 0, the card has nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards, and inclusionAI publishes no guardrail probe for this model as it did for Ling 3.0. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no field-of-use limits, no threshold and no clause letting inclusionAI change or revoke it. Security programme 0, www.inclusion-ai.org answers 404 for security.txt on 10 November 2026, and the Ling-3.0-tiny listing found no SECURITY.md or disclosure policy in the inclusionAI .github repository. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
Agent interface Kimi K3.1 Pro +5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 65
Chat template 10, the format is only code to run. Tool-calling format 10, the parser is named in the runtimes' recipes and the card doesn't say how tools are declared. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn on Kimi K3's tools channel. Structured output 5, named among linked guides without the how. Reasoning control 10, reasoning_effort per request. Context 10, 1M tokens. 10 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 10 + 10 = 65.
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared (JSON in <tools>) and how calls come back (<tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs). Trained tool calling 20, the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and loops over every entry in an assistant message's tool_calls, and the card reports gains on agentic benchmarks, AA-Briefcase and AutomationBench-AA among them. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output. Reasoning control 0, the card documents turning thinking on or off per request with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking, and names the ling3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say where the reasoning text comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens natively in config.json (max_position_embeddings 262144, rope_scaling null) and per SGLang's cookbook. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 60.
Documentation and upkeep Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 51
Model card 11, no limitations, languages or cut-off. Training data 5, one general sentence. Last change 20, a commit on 5 November 2026. Responsiveness 0, none of the 8 newest discussions has a reply from Moonshot. Version policy 5, Kimi K3 keeps its repository and no dated note was found. File health 10, the files agree. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 51.
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56
Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claimed) are on the card. Training data 15, the training-content summary the card links names the source categories (Common Crawl and other public datasets, commercially licensed data, the Ant Spider crawler, synthetic data), the size band (over 10 trillion text tokens), data collected up to about July 2026 and the filtering, without listing datasets with sizes. Last change 20, the newest commit, on 4 November 2026, edited the card, six days before this check, and the files went up on 27 October. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (both opened on 27 October 2026) has a reply from an inclusionAI member. Version policy 5, the update went into a repository of its own and Ling-3.1-flash and Ling 3.0 stay in theirs. File health 5, the card states a 1M-token context while config.json gives 262,144 with no rope scaling, and its serve commands name the earlier repository as the model path. 11 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 56.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 40 | 60 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 45 | Kimi K3.1 Pro +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 60 | Kimi K3.1 Pro +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 51 | 56 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 48.6/100 | C 54.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Kimi K3.1 Pro License (modified MIT) | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
Verdicts
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot's newest flagship, eight days old when read, for operators with a rack. Only llama.cpp has its model code in a release, with vLLM and SGLang support still on a release candidate and a branch. The licence is permissive below a revenue threshold, and Moonshot hasn't answered a discussion on the repository yet.
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
inclusionAI's newest flagship, a 560B hybrid mixture of experts under plain MIT that vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run in released versions. It ships only as 574 GB of FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The card overstates the context, documents little about tool calls, and has no safety results.
Before you call either
Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Use Moonshot's API or Together unless you have a node of eight B300-class accelerators
- With vLLM use 0.34.0 or later and the recipe's flags,
--tool-call-parser kimi_k3 --reasoning-parser kimi_k3 - Pass the whole assistant message back in later turns, reasoning_content and tool_calls included, as the card requires
- Set
reasoning_effortto low, high or max per request. Max is the default and thinking can't be turned off - Kimi K3's model code doesn't load it, because the attention layers changed
- Validate JSON output yourself, since the card doesn't document structured output for the weights
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later on 8 H200 or 4 GB300 GPUs, per the card, and use this repository's name as the model path, not the earlier one the card's command shows
- With vLLM pass
--trust-remote-code,--tool-call-parser ling3and--reasoning-parser ling3 - Set
chat_template_kwargsenable_thinkingfalse for direct answers. Reasoning comes back inreasoning_contentper SGLang's cookbook - Plan on 262,144 tokens of context. The 1M figure needs the YaRN override in SGLang's cookbook
- Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, per the card
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Ling-3.1-flash-1019?
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Kimi K3.1 Pro's 48.6 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Kimi K3.1 Pro leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro or Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Arete-27B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Arete-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- BigBang-v1 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Inkling vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Kronos
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kronos vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-ling-3-1-flash-1019.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kimi-k3-1-pro.json·/api/v1/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kimi-k3-1-pro ling-3-1-flash-1019(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kimi-k3-1-pro", "b": "ling-3-1-flash-1019"}at/mcp, no key