Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.8 (C) and 54.3 (C). MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding
Ahead on
- Reach, 60 against 55
- Risk, 45 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 41
Watch for
574 GB in FP8 with no smaller build from inclusionAI, so no single machine under 690 GB of GPU memory runs it
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
Watch for
SGLang's cookbook still points to a pull request or a dev image on 4 November 2026, and vLLM's recipe still names a nightly image, though both runtimes' releases carry the model code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +15
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56
Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claimed) are on the card. Training data 15, the training-content summary the card links names the source categories (Common Crawl and other public datasets, commercially licensed data, the Ant Spider crawler, synthetic data), the size band (over 10 trillion text tokens), data collected up to about July 2026 and the filtering, without listing datasets with sizes. Last change 20, the newest commit, on 4 November 2026, edited the card, six days before this check, and the files went up on 27 October. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (both opened on 27 October 2026) has a reply from an inclusionAI member. Version policy 5, the update went into a repository of its own and Ling-3.1-flash and Ling 3.0 stay in theirs. File health 5, the card states a 1M-token context while config.json gives 262,144 with no rope scaling, and its serve commands name the earlier repository as the model path. 11 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 56.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 41
The model card earns 11, missing limitations, languages and a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns nothing, as it isn't described. The last change earns 20, an evaluation-results commit of 30 October 2026 after the release commit of 23 October. Responsiveness earns nothing, with no MiniMax reply in nine discussions opened from 23 to 31 October. Version policy earns 5 for a first release in its own repository. File health earns 5, for the tokenizer's 40,960,000-token model_max_length against the 1M context, the Transformers library tag against the card, and an unanswered vLLM streaming report. 11 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 41.
Risk Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +10
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the repository's configuration_bailing_moe_v3.py, since vLLM 0.33.0 registers no bailing_hybrid config of its own. Provenance 15, files in the inclusionAI organisation that inclusion-ai.org links to, per the Ling-3.0-tiny listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results for the model on its card or in the training-content summary. Agent guidance 0, the card has nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards, and inclusionAI publishes no guardrail probe for this model as it did for Ling 3.0. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no field-of-use limits, no threshold and no clause letting inclusionAI change or revoke it. Security programme 0, www.inclusion-ai.org answers 404 for security.txt on 10 November 2026, and the Ling-3.0-tiny listing found no SECURITY.md or disclosure policy in the inclusionAI .github repository. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 35
File safety earns 15, safetensors only, less 10 because the SGLang route the card links passes trust_remote_code for the repository's configuration and processor code. Provenance earns the full 15, files in the organisation MiniMax links to with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing; the launch post's security testing measured offensive capability, and the template's root role isn't documented as a trained hierarchy. Licence risk earns 5, after the military-use ban and the $20M threshold. The security programme earns nothing, with no security.txt, disclosure policy or advisories.
Agent interface MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +10
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared (JSON in <tools>) and how calls come back (<tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs). Trained tool calling 20, the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and loops over every entry in an assistant message's tool_calls, and the card reports gains on agentic benchmarks, AA-Briefcase and AutomationBench-AA among them. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output. Reasoning control 0, the card documents turning thinking on or off per request with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking, and names the ling3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say where the reasoning text comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens natively in config.json (max_position_embeddings 262144, rope_scaling null) and per SGLang's cookbook. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 60.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 70
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, since only the template shows the format and the parsers come from vLLM's and SGLang's own docs. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several invoke blocks in one call. Structured output earns nothing, as it isn't documented. Reasoning control earns 10, with reasoning_effort per request on the card and the reasoning in mm:think tags. Context earns 10 for 1,048,576 tokens with no position scaling.
Reach Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build. Runtimes 25, Released model code in Transformers 5.22.2 (bailing_hybrid), vLLM 0.33.0 (BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM, with ling3 tool and reasoning parsers), SGLang 0.5.23 (bailing_moe_v3.py, its bailing_hybrid config and MTP module) and llama.cpp b12242 (bailingmoe3), and Ollama, credited through its pinned llama.cpp as on the Ling-3.0-tiny listing: v0.40.16 sets LLAMA_CPP_VERSION to b12177. Builds 10, the release is FP8, the one quantised precision inclusionAI publishes for it. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, with no use policy or other terms added on the card or in the repository. Download 10, the Hub API's model info gives gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, the Hub API's provider mapping is empty for this repository on 10 November 2026. 0 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 55
Memory earns nothing. MiniMax's only build is its 250 GB NVFP4 and MXFP8 release, about 300 GB with the fifth added, above 256 GB, and no runtime library has a local build. Runtimes earn 20. llama.cpp from b11861 runs it, Ollama v0.40.14 pins llama.cpp b11963 with the minimax-m3 architecture, vLLM v0.33.0 (tagged 1 November 2026) registers the architecture and meets its recipe's minimum version, and SGLang v0.5.23 (tagged 29 October) registers it with M3.1 processor code and tests, though its cookbook still points to a pull request. Transformers support is in progress per the card and LM Studio has no entry. Builds earn 10 for one publisher precision. Terms earn 10, since commercial use is free with attribution and a notice below $20M of yearly revenue. Download earns 10, with no gate. Hosted earns 5, since MiniMax's API and Novita serve it. 0 + 20 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 55 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 35 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 70 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 41 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.8/100 | C 54.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
inclusionAI's newest flagship, a 560B hybrid mixture of experts under plain MIT that vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run in released versions. It ships only as 574 GB of FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The card overstates the context, documents little about tool calls, and has no safety results.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
A 428B mixture-of-experts model, 23B active, for agent work, coding and computer use, with image and video input, about 1M tokens of context and parallel tool calls. It needs a 4 to 8 GPU server for 250 GB of NVFP4 and MXFP8 weights. vLLM 0.33.0 and SGLang 0.5.23 carry its code. Commercial use needs attribution and notice.
Before you call either
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later on 8 H200 or 4 GB300 GPUs, per the card, and use this repository's name as the model path, not the earlier one the card's command shows
- With vLLM pass
--trust-remote-code,--tool-call-parser ling3and--reasoning-parser ling3 - Set
chat_template_kwargsenable_thinkingfalse for direct answers. Reasoning comes back inreasoning_contentper SGLang's cookbook - Plan on 262,144 tokens of context. The 1M figure needs the YaRN override in SGLang's cookbook
- Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, per the card
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Check the use case first; commercial products must show "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" and notify MiniMax once, or get written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue
- On 8 H100 or H200 GPUs use vLLM 0.33.0 or later, or the recipe's image vllm/vllm-openai:minimax-m31-flash, with --tensor-parallel-size 8 --block-size 128 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --moe-backend marlin --max-model-len 262144
- Pass --reasoning-parser minimax_m3 --tool-call-parser minimax_m3 --enable-auto-tool-choice in vLLM, or minimax-m3 for both in SGLang with --trust-remote-code
- --block-size 128 is mandatory in vLLM, since MSA's sparse block size is 128
- Set effort per request with chat_template_kwargs reasoning_effort (low, medium, high, xhigh, max); sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- On Blackwell or MI355X, 4 GPUs serve it with the DSpark draft from dspark/; vLLM's Hopper command leaves DSpark off and turns video input off
- For GGUF builds by others, use llama.cpp b11861 or later; earlier builds mis-scale the NVFP4 experts and produce garbage
- Without the hardware, call MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on MiniMax's API (minimax-api), whose thinking defaults to max effort
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.8 (C) and 54.3 (C). MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Arete-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Arete-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-minimax-m3-1-flash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m3-1-flash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-1-flash-1019 minimax-m3-1-flash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-1-flash-1019", "b": "minimax-m3-1-flash"}at/mcp, no key