Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.1-flash-1019 leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 546 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding
Ahead on
- Risk, 45 against 40
- Agent interface, 60 against 35
Watch for
574 GB in FP8 with no smaller build from inclusionAI, so no single machine under 690 GB of GPU memory runs it
Best for Agents that need a local model to see, hear and speak on a laptop or a single small GPU, with a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 66 against 56
Watch for
Speech output and full duplex need trust_remote_code with Transformers 4.51.0 or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach MiniCPM-o 4.5 +30
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build. Runtimes 25, Released model code in Transformers 5.22.2 (bailing_hybrid), vLLM 0.33.0 (BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM, with ling3 tool and reasoning parsers), SGLang 0.5.23 (bailing_moe_v3.py, its bailing_hybrid config and MTP module) and llama.cpp b12242 (bailingmoe3), and Ollama, credited through its pinned llama.cpp as on the Ling-3.0-tiny listing: v0.40.16 sets LLAMA_CPP_VERSION to b12177. Builds 10, the release is FP8, the one quantised precision inclusionAI publishes for it. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, with no use policy or other terms added on the card or in the repository. Download 10, the Hub API's model info gives gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, the Hub API's provider mapping is empty for this repository on 10 November 2026. 0 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 90
Memory 30, OpenBMB's 4-bit GGUF with its vision file is 5.9 GB, about 7 GB with a fifth added. Runtimes 15 of 25, released vLLM, llama.cpp and Ollama run it, while Transformers 5.22.1 still needs OpenBMB's remote code and SGLang 0.5.23 supports only the older 2.6. Builds 15, GGUF at several precisions plus AWQ and GPTQ. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0. Download 10, nothing gated. Hosted 5, OpenBMB's own API serves it.
Agent interface Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +25
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared (JSON in <tools>) and how calls come back (<tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs). Trained tool calling 20, the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and loops over every entry in an assistant message's tool_calls, and the card reports gains on agentic benchmarks, AA-Briefcase and AutomationBench-AA among them. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output. Reasoning control 0, the card documents turning thinking on or off per request with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking, and names the ling3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say where the reasoning text comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens natively in config.json (max_position_embeddings 262144, rope_scaling null) and per SGLang's cookbook. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 60.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 35
Chat template 20, a Jinja template in the tokenizer config. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, only the inherited Qwen3 template says how tools work. Trained tool calling 0, OpenBMB never mentions tool use. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, thinking turns on and off per request but nobody says where the reasoning comes back. Context 5, 40,960 tokens. Read as an omni model, it takes images, video and audio and returns text and streaming speech, which the card documents with code.
Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-o 4.5 +10
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56
Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claimed) are on the card. Training data 15, the training-content summary the card links names the source categories (Common Crawl and other public datasets, commercially licensed data, the Ant Spider crawler, synthetic data), the size band (over 10 trillion text tokens), data collected up to about July 2026 and the filtering, without listing datasets with sizes. Last change 20, the newest commit, on 4 November 2026, edited the card, six days before this check, and the files went up on 27 October. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (both opened on 27 October 2026) has a reply from an inclusionAI member. Version policy 5, the update went into a repository of its own and Ling-3.1-flash and Ling 3.0 stay in theirs. File health 5, the card states a 1M-token context while config.json gives 262,144 with no rope scaling, and its serve commands name the earlier repository as the model path. 11 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 56.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 66
Model card 11 of 20, limitations, context length and a knowledge cut-off are missing. Training data 5, described by kind without sources, sizes or a cut-off. Last change 20, the card changed on 24 October 2026. Responsiveness 10, OpenBMB answered half of the 12 questions. Version policy 10, earlier models stay in their own repositories and releases are dated. File health 10, the files agree and the two bug reports have replies.
Risk Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the repository's configuration_bailing_moe_v3.py, since vLLM 0.33.0 registers no bailing_hybrid config of its own. Provenance 15, files in the inclusionAI organisation that inclusion-ai.org links to, per the Ling-3.0-tiny listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results for the model on its card or in the training-content summary. Agent guidance 0, the card has nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards, and inclusionAI publishes no guardrail probe for this model as it did for Ling 3.0. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no field-of-use limits, no threshold and no clause letting inclusionAI change or revoke it. Security programme 0, www.inclusion-ai.org answers 404 for security.txt on 10 November 2026, and the Ling-3.0-tiny listing found no SECURITY.md or disclosure policy in the inclusionAI .github repository. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
MiniCPM-o 4.5 40
File safety 5 of 25, two pickle files sit in the speech stage and the documented load runs repository code. Provenance 15, the files are in the openbmb organisation OpenBMB's GitHub links, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 5, general cautions only, nothing about voice cloning misuse, prompt injection or refusals. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no security.txt, policy or advisories.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 90 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 40 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 35 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 66 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.8/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | MiniCPM-o 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0; built from Qwen3-8B, SigLIP2, Whisper-medium and CosyVoice2, all Apache 2.0 on their Hub cards |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
inclusionAI's newest flagship, a 560B hybrid mixture of experts under plain MIT that vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run in released versions. It ships only as 574 GB of FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The card overstates the context, documents little about tool calls, and has no safety results.
MiniCPM-o 4.5
A small omni cousin that sees, listens and talks back, with full-duplex speech and voice cloning, in about 7 GB at 4-bit through llama.cpp or Ollama for text and images. Speech output needs OpenBMB's remote code or llama.cpp-omni, and 28 GB of GPU for the full demo. The main risks are repository code and pickle files and no safety results.
Before you call either
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later on 8 H200 or 4 GB300 GPUs, per the card, and use this repository's name as the model path, not the earlier one the card's command shows
- With vLLM pass
--trust-remote-code,--tool-call-parser ling3and--reasoning-parser ling3 - Set
chat_template_kwargsenable_thinkingfalse for direct answers. Reasoning comes back inreasoning_contentper SGLang's cookbook - Plan on 262,144 tokens of context. The 1M figure needs the YaRN override in SGLang's cookbook
- Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, per the card
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Quickest start for text and images is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm-o4.5, about 6 GB - With vLLM 0.16.0 or later pass
--trust-remote-code, and sendstop_token_ids[151643, 151645] as OpenBMB's guide does - vLLM, llama.cpp and Ollama return text only; for speech out use the card's Transformers 4.51.0 code or OpenBMB's llama.cpp-omni
- In llama.cpp pass both the language GGUF and MiniCPM-o-4_5-vision-F16.gguf with
--mmproj, and use--jinja --reasoning-budget 0to turn thinking off - Keep prompts within 40,960 tokens
- Don't rely on tool calls or JSON output, neither is documented; validate any you get
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or MiniCPM-o 4.5?
MiniCPM-o 4.5 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.1-flash-1019 leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Arete-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Arete-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kronos vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kronos vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-minicpm-o-4-5.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm-o-4-5.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-1-flash-1019 minicpm-o-4-5(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-1-flash-1019", "b": "minicpm-o-4-5"}at/mcp, no key