Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 62.7 (B) on agent readiness against Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.1-flash-1019 leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 31
Watch for
574 GB in FP8 with no smaller build from inclusionAI, so no single machine under 690 GB of GPU memory runs it
Best for Agents with a 32 GB or larger machine that want a quick, permissively licensed coding and tool-calling cousin with vision.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 60
- Risk, 55 against 45
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
Watch for
No safety evaluation, no agent-use guidance and no way to report a security flaw
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +25
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build. Runtimes 25, Released model code in Transformers 5.22.2 (bailing_hybrid), vLLM 0.33.0 (BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM, with ling3 tool and reasoning parsers), SGLang 0.5.23 (bailing_moe_v3.py, its bailing_hybrid config and MTP module) and llama.cpp b12242 (bailingmoe3), and Ollama, credited through its pinned llama.cpp as on the Ling-3.0-tiny listing: v0.40.16 sets LLAMA_CPP_VERSION to b12177. Builds 10, the release is FP8, the one quantised precision inclusionAI publishes for it. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, with no use policy or other terms added on the card or in the repository. Download 10, the Hub API's model info gives gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, the Hub API's provider mapping is empty for this repository on 10 November 2026. 0 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 85
Memory earns 20 because the smallest 4-bit build from a runtime's own library is Ollama's Q4_K_M at 23 GB, which comes to 27.6 GB with the fifth added, so it needs a 32 GB machine rather than a 24 GB one. Runtimes earn the full 25, since released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run the architecture. Builds earn 10 for Alibaba's one quantised build, FP8, with no 4-bit or GGUF from the publisher. Terms earn 15 for plain Apache 2.0, download earns 10 for ungated files, and hosted earns 5 because DeepInfra, Featherless AI and Scaleway serve it through Hugging Face.
Documentation and upkeep Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +25
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56
Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claimed) are on the card. Training data 15, the training-content summary the card links names the source categories (Common Crawl and other public datasets, commercially licensed data, the Ant Spider crawler, synthetic data), the size band (over 10 trillion text tokens), data collected up to about July 2026 and the filtering, without listing datasets with sizes. Last change 20, the newest commit, on 4 November 2026, edited the card, six days before this check, and the files went up on 27 October. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (both opened on 27 October 2026) has a reply from an inclusionAI member. Version policy 5, the update went into a repository of its own and Ling-3.1-flash and Ling 3.0 stay in theirs. File health 5, the card states a 1M-token context while config.json gives 262,144 with no rope scaling, and its serve commands name the earlier repository as the model path. 11 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 56.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 31
The model card earns 11, covering intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description with no cut-off. The last change earns 5, a README edit on 24 April 2026, 192 days before this check, past 180 days and within a year, and Qwen's GitHub repository holds only a README and licence, so no reference code of Alibaba's changed later. Responsiveness earns 0, with no Qwen reply in the 40 most recent of 62 discussions that aren't pull requests, recounted on 2 November. Version policy earns 5, the earlier version kept in its own repository without a note. File health earns 5, the files agree but reports about tool calling and the template wait unanswered.
Risk Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +10
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the repository's configuration_bailing_moe_v3.py, since vLLM 0.33.0 registers no bailing_hybrid config of its own. Provenance 15, files in the inclusionAI organisation that inclusion-ai.org links to, per the Ling-3.0-tiny listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results for the model on its card or in the training-content summary. Agent guidance 0, the card has nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards, and inclusionAI publishes no guardrail probe for this model as it did for Ling 3.0. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no field-of-use limits, no threshold and no clause letting inclusionAI change or revoke it. Security programme 0, www.inclusion-ai.org answers 404 for security.txt on 10 November 2026, and the Ling-3.0-tiny listing found no SECURITY.md or disclosure policy in the inclusionAI .github repository. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 55
File safety earns 25 for safetensors only, loaded by the runtimes' own code and a Jinja template with nothing run from the repository. Provenance earns 15, files in the Qwen organisation the publisher links and a hash for every file. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn 0, since the card has neither safety results nor any guidance on refusals, injection or safeguards. Licence risk keeps all 15, as Apache 2.0 carries none of the four conditions and the late LICENSE file only wrote down what the card already said. The security programme earns 0, with no reporting route found on qwen.ai, the card or the GitHub repository, which is noted as unchecked for Alibaba's group-wide centre.
Agent interface Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +10
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared (JSON in <tools>) and how calls come back (<tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs). Trained tool calling 20, the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and loops over every entry in an assistant message's tool_calls, and the card reports gains on agentic benchmarks, AA-Briefcase and AutomationBench-AA among them. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output. Reasoning control 0, the card documents turning thinking on or off per request with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking, and names the ling3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say where the reasoning text comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens natively in config.json (max_position_embeddings 262144, rope_scaling null) and per SGLang's cookbook. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 60.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 70
The chat template earns 20 as a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, because the card names the qwen3_coder parser but leaves the return format to the template. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several calls to a turn in the template. Structured output earns 0, as JSON output isn't documented for the model. Reasoning control earns 10, thinking off per request with enable_thinking and the reasoning returned in think tags for the qwen3 parser. Context earns 10 for 262,144 tokens native.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 85 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 55 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 70 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 31 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +25 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.8/100 | B 62.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-04-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
inclusionAI's newest flagship, a 560B hybrid mixture of experts under plain MIT that vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run in released versions. It ships only as 574 GB of FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The card overstates the context, documents little about tool calls, and has no safety results.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A fast mixture-of-experts cousin with 3B active parameters for coding and tool calling, with image and video input, in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 28 GB. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba maintains it, with no safety results, no security contact and no replies to tool-calling reports.
Before you call either
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later on 8 H200 or 4 GB300 GPUs, per the card, and use this repository's name as the model path, not the earlier one the card's command shows
- With vLLM pass
--trust-remote-code,--tool-call-parser ling3and--reasoning-parser ling3 - Set
chat_template_kwargsenable_thinkingfalse for direct answers. Reasoning comes back inreasoning_contentper SGLang's cookbook - Plan on 262,144 tokens of context. The 1M figure needs the YaRN override in SGLang's cookbook
- Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, per the card
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run qwen3.6:35b(Q4_K_M, 23 to 24 GB on disk, about 28 GB in memory) - On the reference machine use
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, BF16, since vLLM doesn't document FP8 compute on gfx1151 - Use the qwen3_coder tool-call parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser in vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 or later
- Thinking is on by default and /nothink isn't supported, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks, or preserve_thinking as true to keep earlier reasoning
- Card sampling for thinking is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, presence_penalty 1.5, and for non-thinking temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8
- Keep at least 128K of context as the card advises, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since the model card documents none
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 62.7 (B) on agent readiness against Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.1-flash-1019 leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ZAYA1-8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-6-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-1-flash-1019 qwen3-6-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-1-flash-1019", "b": "qwen3-6-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key